Essay - Danny's Decision 1) the Central Ethical Issue is Whether or...


1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21
Copyright Notice

Danny's Decision

1) The central ethical issue is whether or not Danny should leak the information to Cross about the fraudulent contracts. Danny would need to break ***** law in order to give ***** the information, but the information pertains to others in government breaking the law. Danny has a responsibility to the American people in his role ***** uncover such *****formation, but he also has a responsibility to t***** ***** people to protect the national security interest.

2) One of the key issues is whether or not ***** has other channels available to him to blow the whistle on ***** fraudulent c*****tracts. He may in fact have legal means ***** resolve the issue, rather that resort*****g to illegal means through contact with Cross. Indeed, Danny appears ***** be covered by the Whistleblower Protection Act, meaning that he can disclose ***** fraud to others within government and receive protection against action from his superiors (Whitaker, 2007). Thus, Danny may have other alternatives that lessen the ***** quandary involved.

3) ***** can go to Cross, keep the information to himself or go through other government ***** as an internal whistleblower. We can deduce that those within his department will be negatively affected by the first and third options. Danny will suffer consequences with the first option because the activity is illegal. ***** second option will result in fewer negative consequences f***** Danny but he will ***** failed the American people ***** his duty. The ***** option will allow him to meet his duty and mitigate ***** consequences to **********. The other key stakeholder is national security. The *****ulent contracts are more potentially damaging than the leak of *****m, so the second option is most damaging. ***** public as a ***** would be ***** harmed ***** the ***** and ***** options, the first ***** ***** controversy would undermine ***** confidence in government and the second because ***** taxpayers would be subject to ongoing fraud.

4) Under rule utilitarianism, Danny should consider the ***** ***** his action if he were ***** follow ***** rules all of t***** *****ime (Mautner, no date). ***** is guided by the boundaries of h***** job, which obliges him to consider both his ***** to the American people and to ***** security. The expected consequences, in general, are the protection of national security ***** ***** occasional ***** or abuse being allowed. Under this rule, Danny would need to trust that, on average, the results are going to be positive. With whistleblower protecti***** in place, however, ***** can now protect both national ***** and the taxpayer's *****, though Danny *****not assume the system ***** work as *****tended, given recent cases of government ***** of state secrets privilege to protest itself (Edmond, 2007).

Under deontology, *****, choices ***** morally required, forbidden or permitted. For Danny, the dilemma is that the two ***** he ***** identified are both ***** ***** law. The third option - to be an internal ***** - is *****. Indeed, it is morally required, because it ***** part

. . . . [END OF RESEARCH PAPER PREVIEW]

Download complete paper (and others like it)    |    Order a brand new, custom-written paper

© 2001–2017   |   Research Paper on Danny's Decision 1) the Central Ethical Issue is Whether or   |   Dissertation Models