Essay - Danny's Decision 1) the Central Ethical Issue is Whether or...

1 2
Copyright Notice

Danny's Decision

1) The central ethical issue is whether or not Danny should leak the information to Cross about the fraudulent contracts. ***** would need to break ***** law in order to give ***** the *****, but the information pertains ***** o*****rs in government breaking the law. Danny has a responsibility to ***** Americ*****n people in h***** role to uncover such **********, but he also has a responsibility to the American people to protect the national security interest.

2) One of the key issues is whe*****r or not ***** has other channels available to him to blow the whistle on ***** fraudulent c*****tracts. He may in fact have legal means to resolve the issue, rather that resorting to illegal ***** through contact with Cross. Indeed, Danny appears to be covered by the Whistleblower Protection Act, meaning ***** he can disclose ***** fraud ***** others within ***** and receive protection against action from his superi***** (Whitaker, 2007). Thus, Danny may have other alternatives that lessen the ***** quandary involved.

3) ***** can go to Cross, keep the information to himself or go through other government channels as an internal whistleblower. We can deduce that those within his department will be negatively affected by the first and third options. Danny will suffer consequences with the ***** option because the activity is illegal. The second option will result in fewer negative consequences for Danny but he ***** have failed the American people in his duty. The third option will allow him ***** meet his ***** and mitigate negative consequences to **********. The other key stakeholder is ***** security. The *****ulent contracts are more potentially damaging than the leak of *****m, so the second option is most *****. ***** public ***** a ***** would be more h*****rmed by the first and ***** options, the ***** ***** the controversy would undermine public confidence in government and the second because ***** taxpayers would be subject to ongoing fraud.

4) Under rule utilitarianism, Danny should consider the consequences ***** his action if he were to follow the rules all of the time (Mautner, no date). He is guided ***** the boundaries of h***** job, which obliges him to consider both his duty to the American people and ***** national security. The expected consequences, in general, are the protection of national security with ***** occasional fraud or abuse being **********. ***** this rule, Danny would need to trust that, on average, the results are going to be positive. With whistleblower protection in place, however, ***** can now protect both national security and ***** taxpayer's *****, though Danny *****not assume the system ***** work as *****tended, given recent cases of ***** abuse of state secrets privilege to protest itself (Edmond, 2007).

Under deon*****logy, *****, choices ***** morally required, forbidden or permitted. For Danny, ***** dilemma is that the two ***** he has identified are both ***** by law. ***** ***** option - to be an ***** whistleblower - is permitted. Indeed, it ***** morally required, because it is part


Download complete paper (and others like it)    |    Order a brand new, customized paper

Other topics that might interest you:

© 2001–2016   |   Research Papers on Danny's Decision 1) the Central Ethical Issue is Whether or   |   Dissertations Models