Essay - Danny's Decision 1) the Central Ethical Issue is Whether or...


Copyright Notice

Danny's Decision

1) The central ethical issue is whether or not Danny should leak the inf*****mation to Cross about the fraudulent contracts. ***** would need to break ***** law in order ***** give ***** the *****formation, but the information pertains to o*****rs in government breaking the law. Danny has a responsibility to ***** American people in his role ***** uncover such information, but he also has a responsibility to t***** ***** people *****o protect the national security interest.

2) One of the key issues is whether or not Danny has other channels available to him ***** blow the whistle on the fraudulent c*****tracts. He may in fact have legal means to resolve the issue, rather that resorting to illegal ***** through contact with Cross. Indeed, Danny appears ***** be covered by the Whistleblower Protection Act, meaning ***** he can disclose ***** fraud to ot*****rs within government and receive *****ion against action from his superi***** (Whitaker, 2007). Thus, ***** may ***** other alternatives that lessen the ***** quandary involved.

3) Danny can go to *****, keep the ***** to himself or go through o*****r government ***** as an internal whistleblower. We can deduce that those within his department will be negatively affected by the first and third options. Danny ***** suffer consequences with the ***** option because the activity is illegal. The second option will result in fewer negative consequences for ***** but he ***** have failed the American ***** ***** ***** duty. The third option will allow him to meet his duty and mitigate negative consequences to himself. The other key stakeholder is national security. The fraudulent contracts are more potentially damaging than the leak of them, so the second option is most damaging. The public as a st*****keholder would be more harmed ***** the first and second options, the ***** ***** ***** controversy ***** undermine ***** confidence in ***** and the ***** because ***** taxpayers would be subject to ongoing fraud.

4) Under rule utilitarianism, Danny should consider the ***** ***** his action if he were ***** follow t***** rules all of the time (Mautner, no date). ***** is guided by ***** boundaries of h***** job, w*****ich obliges him to consider both his ***** to the American people and to national security. The expected consequences, in general, are the protection of ***** security with the occasional fraud or abuse being allowed. Under t***** rule, Danny would need to trust that, on average, the results are going to be positive. With whistleblower protection in place, however, ***** can now protect both national ***** and ***** taxpayer's *****, though Danny cannot assume the system will work as *****tended, given recent c*****es of government abuse of state secrets privilege ***** protest itself (Edmond, *****).

Under deontology, however, choi***** ***** morally required, *****bidden or permitted. For Danny, the dilemma is that the two choices he has identified are both forbidden by law. T***** ***** option - to be an ***** whistleblower - is *****. Indeed, it ***** morally required, ***** it is part

. . . . [END OF RESEARCH PAPER PREVIEW]

Download complete paper (and others like it)    |    Order a brand new, custom paper

© 2001–2016   |   Thesis Papers about Danny's Decision 1) the Central Ethical Issue is Whether or   |   Essays Sample