Essay - Danny's Decision 1) the Central Ethical Issue is Whether or...

1 2
Copyright Notice

Danny's Decision

1) The central ethical issue is whether or not Danny should leak the inf*****mation to Cross about the fraudulent contracts. Danny would need to break ***** law in order ***** give Cross the **********, but the information pertains to o*****rs in government breaking the law. Danny has a responsibility to ***** American people in his role to uncover such information, but he also has a responsibility to t***** American people *****o protect the national security interest.

2) One of the key issues is whe*****r or not Danny ***** other channels available to him to blow the whistle on the fraudulent contracts. He may in fact have legal means ***** resolve the issue, rather that resort*****g to illegal means through contact with *****. Indeed, Danny appears ***** be covered by the Whistleblower Protection Act, meaning ***** he can disclose ***** fraud to others within government and receive *****ion against action from his superi***** (Whitaker, 2007). Thus, ***** may ***** other alternatives that lessen the ***** quandary involved.

3) Danny can go to Cross, keep the information to himself or ***** through o*****r government ***** as an internal whistleblower. We can deduce that those within his department will be negatively affected by the first and third options. ***** will suffer consequences with the ***** option because the activity is illegal. The second option will result in fewer negative consequences for Danny but he will have failed the American ***** in his duty. The third option will allow him to meet his ***** and mitigate ***** consequences to himself. The other key stakeholder is national security. The ***** contracts are more potentially damag*****g than the ***** of them, so the ***** option is most damaging. ***** public ***** a st*****keholder ***** be more harmed ***** the first and second options, the first because the controversy would undermine ***** confidence in ***** and the second ***** the taxpayers would be subject to ongoing fraud.

4) Under rule utilitarianism, Danny should consider the ***** of his action if he were to follow ***** rules all of the time (Mautner, no date). ***** is guided by the boundaries of his job, which obliges him to consider both his duty to the American people and ***** national security. The expected consequences, in general, are the protection of ***** security with ***** occasional ***** or abuse being **********. Under this rule, Danny would need to trust that, on average, the results are going to be positive. With whistleblower protecti***** in place, however, Danny can now protect both national ***** and the taxpayer's interest, though Danny ********** assume the system ***** work as intended, given recent c*****es of government ***** of state secrets privilege ***** protest itself (Edmond, 2007).

Under deontology, *****, choi***** are morally required, forbidden or permitted. For Danny, the dilemma is that the two *****ces he has identified are both forbidden ***** law. The ***** option - to be an ***** whistleblower - is *****. Indeed, it is morally required, because it is part


Download complete paper (and others like it)    |    Order a one-of-a-kind, custom paper

Other topics that might interest you:

© 2001–2017   |   Thesis Papers about Danny's Decision 1) the Central Ethical Issue is Whether or   |   Book Reports Examples