Essay - Danny's Decision 1) the Central Ethical Issue is Whether or...


Copyright Notice

Danny's Decision

1) The central ethical issue is whether or not Danny should leak the inf*****mation to Cross about the fraudulent contracts. ***** would need to break the law in order ***** give Cross the *****formation, but the information pertains to others in government breaking the law. Danny has a responsibility to the Americ*****n people in h***** role ***** uncover such information, but he also has a responsibility to t***** American people *****o protect the national security interest.

2) One of the key issues is whe*****r or not Danny has other channels available to him to blow the whistle on ***** fraudulent contracts. He may in fact have legal means to resolve the issue, rather that resorting to illegal ***** through contact with Cross. Indeed, Danny appears ***** be covered by the Whistleblower Protection Act, meaning ***** he can disclose ***** fraud to others within government and receive protection against action from his superiors (Whitaker, 2007). Thus, Danny may have other alternatives that lessen the ethical quandary involved.

3) ***** can go to *****, keep the ***** to himself or go through other ***** channels as an internal whistleblower. We can deduce that those within his department will be negatively affected by the first and third options. Danny will suffer consequences with the ***** option because the activity is illegal. ***** second option will result in fewer negative consequences for ***** but he will have failed the American people in ***** duty. The ***** option will allow him to meet his ***** and mitigate ***** consequences to **********. The other key stakeholder is ***** security. The fraudulent contracts are more potentially damaging than the leak of them, so the ***** option is most *****. ***** public as a st*****keholder would be more harmed by the first and second options, the first because the controversy ***** undermine public confidence in government and the second because ***** taxpayers would be subject to ongoing fraud.

4) Under rule utilitarian*****m, Danny should consider the ***** of his action if he were ***** follow ***** rules all ***** the time (Mautner, no date). ***** is guided ***** ***** boundaries of his job, which obliges him to consider both ***** duty to the ***** people and ***** national security. The expected consequences, in general, are the protection of ***** security ***** ***** occasional fraud or abuse being allowed. ***** this rule, Danny would need to trust that, on average, the results are going to be positive. With whistleblower protecti***** in place, however, Danny can now protect both national ***** and ***** taxpayer's *****, though Danny can***** assume the system ***** work as *****tended, given recent cases of government ***** of state secrets privilege ***** protest itself (Edmond, *****).

Under deontology, however, choices are morally required, ********** or permitted. For Danny, ***** dilemma is that the two ***** he ***** identified are both forbidden by law. ***** third option - to be an ***** ***** - is *****. Indeed, it ***** morally required, because it is part

. . . . [END OF RESEARCH PAPER PREVIEW]

Download complete paper (and others like it)    |    Order a one-of-a-kind, custom-written paper

Other topics that might interest you:

© 2001–2016   |   Dissertations about Danny's Decision 1) the Central Ethical Issue is Whether or   |   Thesis Paper Writing