Essay - Danny's Decision 1) the Central Ethical Issue is Whether or...

Copyright Notice

Danny's Decision

1) The central ethical issue is whether or not Danny should leak the information to Cross about the fraudulent contracts. ***** would need to break the law in order ***** give ***** ***** **********, but the information pertains to others in government breaking the law. Danny has a responsibility to the Americ*****n people in his role to uncover such information, but he also has a responsibility to t***** American people to protect the national security interest.

2) One of the key issues is whe*****r or not ***** ***** other channels available to him to blow the whistle on the fraudulent contracts. He may in fact have legal means to resolve the issue, rather that resort*****g to illegal ***** through contact with Cross. Indeed, Danny appears ***** be covered by the Whistleblower Protection Act, meaning that he can disclose the fraud to others within ***** and receive *****ion against action from his superiors (Whitaker, 2007). Thus, Danny may ***** other alternatives that lessen the ***** quandary involved.

3) ***** can go to *****, keep the ***** to himself or ***** through o*****r government channels as an internal whistleblower. We can deduce that those within his department will be negatively affected by the first and third options. Danny ***** suffer consequences with the ***** option because the activity is illegal. ***** second option will result in fewer negative consequences for ***** but he ***** have failed the American ***** ***** ***** duty. The third option will allow him ***** meet his duty and mitigate negative consequences to himself. The other key stakeholder is ***** security. The *****ulent contracts are more potentially damaging than the leak of them, so the ***** option is most damaging. ***** public as a ***** would be ***** harmed ***** the first and second options, the ***** ***** the controversy would undermine ***** confidence in government and the ***** because ***** taxpayers would be subject to ongoing fraud.

4) Under rule utilitarianism, Danny should consider the consequences ***** his action if he were ***** follow ***** rules all of t***** *****ime (Mautner, no date). He is guided by the boundaries of h***** job, which obliges him to consider both his duty to the ***** people and to national security. The expected consequences, in general, are the protection of ***** security with ***** occasional fraud or abuse being **********. Under this rule, Danny would need to trust that, on average, the results are going to be positive. With whistleblower protecti***** in place, however, Danny can now protect both national security and the taxpayer's interest, though Danny ********** assume the system ***** work as intended, given recent c*****es of government ***** of state secrets privilege ***** protest itself (Edmond, *****).

Under deontology, however, choi***** ***** morally required, *****bidden or permitted. For Danny, ***** dilemma is that the two *****ces he has identified are both forbidden ***** law. ***** ***** option - to be an internal ***** - is *****. Indeed, it ***** ***** required, because it is part


Download entire paper (and others like it)    |    Order a brand new, custom paper

© 2001–2015   |   Essay on Danny's Decision 1) the Central Ethical Issue is Whether or   |   Essay Model