Essay - Danny's Decision 1) the Central Ethical Issue is Whether or...


1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21
Copyright Notice

Danny's Decision

1) The central ethical issue is whether or not Danny should leak the information to Cross about the fraudulent contracts. Danny would need to break the law in order to give Cross ***** *****, but the information pertains to o*****rs in government breaking the law. Danny has a responsibility to ***** Americ*****n people in his role to uncover such information, but he also has a responsibility to t***** American people to protect the national security interest.

2) One of the key issues is whe*****r or not Danny has other channels available to him ***** blow the whistle on ***** fraudulent *****. He may in fact have legal means to resolve the issue, rather that resorting to illegal ***** through c*****tact with Cross. Indeed, Danny appears ***** be covered by the Whistleblower Protection Act, meaning ***** he can disclose ***** fraud to others within ***** and receive protection against action from his superiors (Whitaker, 2007). Thus, ***** may ***** other alternatives that lessen the ***** quandary involved.

3) Danny can go to Cross, keep the ***** to himself or go through o*****r government channels as an internal whistleblower. We can deduce that those within his department will be negatively affected by the first and third options. ***** will suffer consequences with the first option because the activity is illegal. ***** second option will result in fewer negative consequences f***** Danny but he ***** have failed the American ***** in ***** duty. The third option will allow him to meet his duty and mitigate negative consequences to **********. The other key stakeholder is ***** security. The ***** contracts are more potentially damag*****g than the ***** of *****m, so the ***** option is most damaging. The public ***** a ***** ***** be ***** harmed ***** the ***** and second options, the first ***** ***** controversy would undermine ***** confidence in government and the ***** because the taxpayers would be subject to ongoing *****.

4) Under rule utilitarianism, Danny should consider the consequences of his action if he were to follow t***** rules all ***** the time (Mautner, no date). ***** is guided by ***** boundaries of h***** job, w*****ich obliges him ***** consider both his duty to the American people and ***** national security. The expected consequences, in general, are the protection of national security ***** the occasional fraud or abuse being allowed. Under this rule, Danny would need to trust that, on average, the results are going to be positive. With whistleblower protection in place, however, ***** can now protect both national security ***** the taxpayer's *****, though Danny *****not assume the system ***** work as *****tended, given recent c*****es of ***** abuse of state secrets privilege ***** protest itself (Edmond, *****).

Under deontology, however, choices are morally required, forbidden or permitted. For Danny, the dilemma is that the two choices he has identified are both ***** ***** law. ***** ***** option - to be an internal ***** - is *****. Indeed, it ***** ***** required, because it is part

. . . . [END OF DISSERTATION PREVIEW]

Download entire paper (and others like it)    |    Order a brand new, customized paper

© 2001–2017   |   Essay on Danny's Decision 1) the Central Ethical Issue is Whether or   |   Thesis Papers Examples