Essay - Foreign Relations the United States Should Adopt a Policy of...

Foreign Relations

The United States should adopt a policy of spe*****king softly and carrying a big stick. This policy is more congruent with the country's capabilities and presence in ***** world. It recognizes the fundamental fact that ***** United States has a big stick. Adopting ***** Gandhi-esque policy of carrying no ***** makes little sense as a result. Gandhi w***** essentially forced into adopting his ***** of non-violence. He had ***** real leverage over the British. Going against a large military po*****er, he would have met with failure ***** he adopted a violent approach. His revolution ***** have been quickly quashed by the British. The adoption of a policy of ***** w*****s a tactic born ***** necessity.

For the United *****, the stick already exists. The US has ***** world's largest military, with the highest level of technology and with nuclear *****. America is ***** ***** largest economy and ***** a major trading partner for most of the world's countries. It would be impossible to ***** a small stick under these circumstances. As a result, foreign policy must be designed *****round the reality that the US is the world's largest economic and military power.

However, it is important to work *****in the limits of that power. The ***** has ***** choice to speak ***** or speak loudly. Current foreign policy is clearly based on 'speak loudly'. The nati***** actively involves itself in the affairs ***** other *****, *****stigates conflict, ***** overthro***** governments. The response from the global community is naturally going ***** have a strong negative element as a result of this *****. The c*****e can be made that *****re are a number of nations willing to engage in saber-rattling and testing the limits of US *****. For these countries, holding the big stick may not simply be enough.

***** said, ***** majority of US foreign policy should be guided around the principle of speaking softly. ***** reality is that ***** United States is neither large enough nor powerful enough to wield its big ***** around the entire world at once. In order to achieve key foreign policy objectives, the US ***** find partners in o*****r nations. Smaller nations with limited power ***** be coerced simply ***** the nature of economic dependence. ***** ***** ***** ***** world's major economies, however, a degree of soft speech ***** required.

***** a big stick on larger ***** is likely ***** alienate them. In recent years, we have seen significant alienati***** of US allies. The ***** has ********** that foreign ***** objectives in Iraq and Afghanistan ***** not ***** with the anticipated success. Objectives with respect to much stronger adversaries, such as China or Russia, ***** cannot be met by the US alone. Therefore, speaking ***** will cultivate relationships and allegiances. Coalitions can be built to help the US attain its ***** policy objectives.

Ultimately, it is worth remembering that size ***** ***** America's stick is lim*****ed ***** the extent to which it ***** can be used. Many ***** have significant sticks of their