Essay - The Great Global Warming Swindle: a Film Documentary Introduction the...


1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85
Copyright Notice

The Great Global Warming Swindle: A Film Documentary

Introduction

The free film documentary The ***** Global ***** Swindle (2007), found online at http://www.moviesfoundonline.com/documentaries.php#war_on_terror,presents a controversial response to alleg*****ions that global warming is a result of mankind's pollution of the atmosphere by human generated greenhouse gases. ***** documentary presents the ideas and studies ***** scient*****ts who take the unpopular position that ***** warming is a natural event, and ***** it is cons*****tent with the earth's ever changing weather conditions; and that the current global ***** "scare" is to promote business profits in those sectors of business that stand to benefit financially from global warming as an "event."

The global warming theorists have responded ***** the documentary with their counter argument; some are good, and others are weak. The proposal of this essay is to attempt to present both sides; what is *****ed in the film documentary, how it ***** debunked by supporters of the global warm*****g theory, and what information presented in the documentary and in the response can be debunked; ***** ***** is left after the debunking. What science remains after applying science to both arguments?

The Controversy

The ***** documentary The Great Global Warming Swindle (2007), ***** director Martin Durkin, features ***** ***** ***** world's - and certainly the United States' - most highly credible ***** respected scientists in a discussion on ***** warm*****g. ***** scientists are taking the position ***** global warming is occurring, but that it is more scientifically seen ***** the natural forces of nature as opposed to the man-made ***** g*****ses or CO2 put in***** the atmosphere by mankind. Their argument about global warming as a ***** occurrence is compelling, and convincing.

*****t the foundation ***** th***** argument, which h***** garnered great support, including celebrities like Leonardo DiCaprio, ***** political force, like former Vice President Al Gore who has made a film about man's abuse of fossil fuels; is the notion that ***** warming ***** bringing ***** climate change that is responsible for everything from the melting of the icebergs at ***** north pole, to tidal waves and hurricanes (Gore, A., *****n Inconvenient Truth, 2006, motion-picture).

***** response ***** the alleg*****ions that mankind and, especially, that ***** - regardless of who put it into the air; mankind, plants, the residual of the decaying plant and life processes. A group of scient*****ts, including highly ***** Professor Tim Ball, of the Univers*****y of Winnipeg; ***** Niv Shaviv, University of Jerusalem; Pr*****essor Ian Clark, University of Ottawa; Pr*****essor John Christy of the University of Alabama ***** lead author International Panel on Climate Change (IPCC), Pr*****essor Philip Stott, University of London; Professor Richard Lindzen, ***** Massachusetts Institute of Technology; and others from Harvard and other highly respected universities around the world. Have come together on film, loaded with scientific in*****mation *****, if it does not refute mankind's responsibility for global warming, at least demonstrates that there is a lack of ***** evidence to ***** ***** contention.

***** it ***** highly controversial, and because these scientists have taken the unpopular

. . . . [END OF DISSERTATION PREVIEW]

Download complete paper (and others like it)    |    Order a brand new, custom-written paper

© 2001–2017   |   Book Reports about The Great Global Warming Swindle: a Film Documentary Introduction the   |   Term Paper Models