Essay - Police Use of Non-lethal Weapons There is a Wide Variety...


Copyright Notice

POLICE USE OF NON-LETHAL WEAPONS

***** is a wide v*****riety of weapons which are now available for self defense as well ***** for the use of police when tackling dangerous perpetrators. While some ***** used particularly to inflict lethal harm to the attacker o*****rs aim at only detracting the perpetr*****or from causing any ***** to the victim. The use ***** non lethal ***** by the police has been a subject for debate for some time now because it has become obvious that technology enables the law enforcement forces to use in their missions different means ***** are not ***** for the human life.

***** main points of discussion referring to the ***** of non lethal weapons by the ***** can be seen in the actual discussion over police legitimacy. More precisely, it is considered that nowadays no individual or state ent*****y has the right ***** apply force by all means. In this sense, one can consider the actual notion of ***** legitimacy in order to see the way in which the community can be split when discussing the matter of ***** lethal ***** of enforcing the *****. In ***** end, the matter is reduced to the right of ***** police to inflict lethal harm. Therefore, from a theoretical point of view, police legitimacy can be understood as "public recognition ***** the policymaker's authority" as well ***** the result of an "agreement" (Mondak, 1994, 677). More precisely, "legitimacy exists when the citizen approves of a policy's subst*****ce" th*****t is when ***** community ***** identify with the core nature of the law enforcement practice (*****, 1994, 677).

Given the fact that there are more and ***** cases of abuses being revealed at the level of the police work, ***** ***** on whether the police is legitimate to use lethal force against people, regardless of their offence, is thus fueled. Cases of police ab***** stirred the controversy over the excessive use of fire arms in police activities. In ***** sense, one of ***** cases ***** drew the attention of ***** media as well as the public was ***** Da Silva case in which Kurt Da Silva was killed "by a Pawtucket, Rhode Island police *****ficer after a low-speed c*****r c*****e. DeSilva, who was unarmed, was suspected of driving a stolen car" (America Civil Liberties Union, 1997). This comes to prove the ***** that indeed action must be taken in order ***** prevent ab*****s ***** the police, no matter ***** difficult circumstances the ***** enforcement authorities are faced *****.

A*****ther aspect which is relevant for the debate is the doctrine of the proportionality of punishment. More *****, "an agent who is guilty of (and responsible for" murder must be punished by death" (Corlett, 2001, 51). Despite ***** fact ***** the example offered by Corlett ***** cited from Kant is radical, in general terms it can be said that ***** of ***** basic principles ***** the law is represented by the proportionality of the punishment ***** is the punishment must be proportional to the wrong

. . . . [END OF RESEARCH PAPER PREVIEW]

Download complete paper (and others like it)    |    Order a one-of-a-kind, custom paper

Other topics that might interest you:

© 2001–2016   |   Research Paper on Police Use of Non-lethal Weapons There is a Wide Variety   |   Book Report Sample