Essay - Political Movements in Latin America This Paper is Divided into...


1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21
Copyright Notice

Political Movements in Latin America

***** paper is divided into two parts: the first part provides and defends a definition of populism, addressing its ideology, social base, charisma, clientelism, and the extent of institutionalization; the second part argues that ***** ***** guerrilla movements are very similar phenomena, divided only by the level of their extremism.

***** ***** many *****s of 'populism', as seemingly each academic uses his or her own definition of this term, expecting all readers to automatically agree with this definition. As Roberts (1995) says, "few ***** science concepts can match populism when it comes to nebulous and inconsistent usage." ***** Roberts (1995) says, "These multiple dimensions have allowed the populist concept ***** be applied to a wide range of loosely connected empirical phenomena, ranging from economic policies ***** development ph*****es ***** political ideologies, movements, parties, governments, and social coalitions": some ***** these will be discussed below.

Some definitions label political populism as, "excessive centralization of decision-making, i.e., rule ***** decree, with decreasing depoliticization" (Eder, 2003). Many academics, such as Eder (2003) ***** sh***** that globalization (***** neoliberalism) has not put an end to populism, but rather has tr*****sformed it, into 'neopopulism', which leaves l*****tle room for 'true' democracy to develop in those countr*****s that have followed these paths. As we ********** see, Venezuela and Peru are two good examples of the 'neopopulist' effects of globalization, as in *****se countries, neoliberal ***** ***** existed side-by-side with populist strategies (Eder, 2003).

Other academics, for example, Weyland (2001) have def*****ed populism as, "populism is best defined as a politic*****l strategy through which a personalistic leader seeks or exercises power based on direct, unmediated, uninstitutionalized support from large numbers of mostly unorganized followers." This 'single-defining variable' definition is hotly contested by academics, most notably Canovan (1999) who offered her own seven sub-categories with which to define populism, arguing that such a complex, multi-faceted ***** was necessary.

********** academics argue ***** populists are ***** ***** ***** message, and that their message ***** only be heard in countries fac*****g crises, such that populism really needs ***** ***** defined within the context of exclusion (Buxton, 2000). Others (*****, 1995) argue that "populism is a recurring phenomenon, rather than a period-specific historical anomaly."

Other academics ***** that populism is a common characteristic of ***** American politics, which has lasted from ***** inception in the first half of the twentieth century (Coslovsky, 2002). It is argued ***** populism is both a political ***** an economic phenomena, *****d that, as *****, it has had an important role in the region's dual transitions (Coslovsky, 2002). Economic ***** can be seen as an attempt to deal with income inequality through the use of overly expansive macroeconomic policies i.e., deficit financing (Coslovsky, 2002).

***** this view, populism is best unders*****od as a ***** *****, ***** politici*****ns being classed as popul*****t if they fulfil three conditions: I) their personal style is paternal*****tic, ***** and charismatic; ii) ***** are able to mobilize, from the top down, a heterogeneous coalition ***** includes urban

. . . . [END OF ESSAY PREVIEW]

Download entire paper (and others like it)    |    Order a one-of-a-kind, custom paper

© 2001–2017   |   Book Reports on Political Movements in Latin America This Paper is Divided into   |   Book Reports Writing