Essay - Practical Book Review Reflections on James C. Peterson's Why Don't...


Copyright Notice

Practical Book Review

Reflections on James C. Peterson's Why Don't We Listen Better? Communicating and Connecting in Relationships

Introduction: "Hey, that's not what I meant!" Using James C. Peterson's 'talker-listener' card to engage in productive dialogue

Of course, ***** know how to communicate—I ***** how ***** talk, and I can hear everyth*****g people say to me, what more do I need to do? Why do I need ***** read a book, in isolation, in the privacy of my study that attempts to tell ***** how I should communicate with others? However, ********** who have such a reaction to the title of Why Don't We ***** Better? Communicating and Connecting in ***** by James C. Petersen (2007) should remember that there is a difference between listen*****g ********** hearing, ***** really engaging with others in meaningful communication versus simply exchanging words. Peterson's text attempts to give the reader effective strategies to improve personal communication processes. His approach ***** be useful to pastors, counselors, teachers, or simply everyone involved in a relationship who wants to ***** his or her communication skills.

The book begins ***** examining why communication processes so often go awry. One of the core concepts ***** the work is that the ***** emotional people are, and the more emotionally attached they are to a particular point of view, the harder it is for them to l*****ten. Their listening capability, if not their hearing capability shuts down. Peterson calls this the 'flat brain *****ory' of listening, w*****e stomachs are in overload, filled with ego rather than openness. This causes hearts grow bricklike ***** unresponsive to the emotional appeals ***** others. The courtroom process of adversarial interaction ***** than a me*****ningful negotiation of common *****s ***** the primary paradigm of our modern culture. While courtroom battles may look like win-lose, they are in reality lose-lose. Using the courtroom approach is counterproductive to our usual, primary goal when communicating. *****n everyday l*****e our primary goal ***** not ***** be victors over others, but friends with our neighbors, loved ones, and colleagues. Reducing ***** disturbances, clarifying thinking, increasing self-confidence, and building supportive friendships are all essential to counteract our fallible ***** all-too-human tendency to fall in***** negative cultural and personal patterns of relating to others. Becoming a good listener reduces conflict and also makes us *****tter s*****rytellers ***** better people

Peterson *****fers what he calls the 'talker-listener' card or a kind of imaginary or invisible third person, a mediator to initiate ***** not division. Playing by the rules of the conversational game, taking turns, and not engaging in a war like street fighters all ensure that ***** *****dividuals engaged in the communicative process are listen*****g as *****ll ***** talking. Peterson makes communication in***** a very literal *****, ***** accessories as well as rules. During his *****s *****shops, he takes manila *****s and writes t***** word 'talker' and 'listener' on either side. This creates a sense of role-pl*****y to conversation—one person is ***** fixed in a s*****gular role ***** listening or talking, which ***** results

. . . . [END OF RESEARCH PAPER PREVIEW]

Download entire paper (and others like it)    |    Order a brand new, custom paper

© 2001–2016   |   Essays about Practical Book Review Reflections on James C. Peterson's Why Don't   |   Essays Examples