Essay - Right to Bear Arms Should Civil Society Have the Right...

1 2
Copyright Notice

Right to bear arms

Should civil society have the right to bear *****? A Critical Look on the Issue of Individualism and Collectivism in ***** Interpretation of the Second Amendment

In the United States Constitution, ***** Second ***** conta*****s the *****s of citizens as individuals, ***** which ***** 'right to ***** arms' is considered part of the conditions stated. The issue ***** a citizen's right to bear arms, or guns, is a deb*****te that h***** remained unresolved, especially if a controversial or celebrated case concerning the right to bear ***** is in focus.

This research provides an alternative way of looking at this issue, wherein the issue of the right ***** bear arms is argued based on the judicial system's interpretation ***** this right: whe*****r the right to ***** arms should be interpreted based on an individualist ***** collectivist point of view.

***** thesis ***** will ***** discussed in this paper assumes the stance that the right ***** bear ***** should be based on a collectivist view, for every individual right, if subjected to interpretati*****s favoring ***** purposes only, would defeat the objectives of the formation of the Constitution itself. Thus, in accordance ***** the objectives of the Constitution, which is to guide both ***** society ***** ***** political system in governance and ***** ensure social order, the right to bear arms must be interpreted in the context of the individual vis-a-vis his/her rights' effect on the society. Thus, if the right ***** bear arms caused or ***** cause detriment to the civil *****, then ***** right should not be considered an argument for an individual to still attain this right, and held not liable ***** whatever ***** the attainment of such right has for the civil society or one's community.

***** ***** of view was subsisted in Busch's (2003) analysis of the case United States vs. Emerson, where***** the issue of ***** right to ***** arms surfaced. In analyzing the Court's decision to defer *****'s right to bear arms, Busch stated that ***** decision was made because the Court's decision ***** "collective" in nature, wherein the welfare of the civil *****, and ***** danger posed by Emerson became the contentions against his case. In asserting that the right to bear ***** must be interpreted in ***** ***** po*****t of view, the author rationalized that "the more collectively ***** right is interpreted, the more broadly Congress can legislate ***** restrict the right to bear arms" (347). In effect, what made sense in Busch's analysis is that ***** particular *****, as stated in the Constitution, must be ***** ***** the proper context. Thus, *****'s ownership of a gun for militia *****, whether he h***** the intent to use this or not, is a threat ***** civil society; hence, ***** Court's decision to deny him his rights to *****ar arms is considered just, in the collectivist's point of view.

***** (*****) argued against Busch's position regarding the interpretation ***** ***** right. For him, the right ***** bear ***** is ***** part of


Download entire paper (and others like it)    |    Order a one-of-a-kind, custom-written paper

Other topics that might interest you:

© 2001–2016   |   Term Paper on Right to Bear Arms Should Civil Society Have the Right   |   Thesis Paper Examples