Essay - Right to Bear Arms Should Civil Society Have the Right...


Copyright Notice

Right to bear arms

Should civil society have the right to bear *****? A Critical Look on the Issue of Individualism and Collectivism in ***** Interpretation ***** the Second Amendment

In the United States Constitution, ***** Second Amendment conta*****s the *****s of citizens as individuals, of which the 'right to ***** arms' is considered part ***** the conditions stated. The issue of a citizen's right ***** bear arms, or guns, is a deb*****te that h***** remained unresolved, especially if a controversi*****l or celebrated case concerning the right to bear ***** is in focus.

This research provides an alternative way of look*****g at this issue, wherein the issue of ***** right ***** bear arms is argued based on the judicial system's interpret*****ion ***** th***** right: whe*****r the right to ***** arms should be interpreted ***** on an individualist or collectivist point of view.

***** ********** ***** will be discussed in this paper assumes the stance that the right ***** bear ***** should be based on a collectivist view, for every individual right, if subjected to interpretations favoring ***** purposes only, would defeat the objectives of ***** formation of the Constitution itself. Thus, in accordance to ***** objectives of the Constitution, which is ***** guide both ***** society ***** ***** political system ***** governance and to ensure social order, the right ***** bear arms must be interpreted in the context of the individual vis-a-vis his/her rights' effect on ***** *****. Thus, if the right to bear ***** caused or ***** cause detriment to the civil society, *****n this ***** should not be considered an argument for an individual to still attain this right, and held not liable ***** whatever detriment the attainment of such right has for the civil ***** or one's community.

***** point of view was subsisted in Busch's (2003) analysis of the ***** United ***** vs. Emerson, wherein the issue of the right to bear arms surfaced. In analyzing the Court's decision to defer ********** ***** to bear arms, Busch stated that ***** decision was made because the Court's decision ***** "collective" in nature, wherein the welfare of the civil society, and the danger posed by Emerson became ***** contentions against his case. In asserting that the right to bear arms must be interpreted in the collectivist point of view, the author rationalized that "***** more collectively the right is interpreted, the more broadly Congress can legislate ***** restrict the ***** to *****ar *****" (347). In effect, what made sense in Busch's analysis is that ***** particular right, as stated ***** the Constitution, must be ***** in the proper context. Thus, *****'s ownership of a gun for militi***** *****, whether he has the intent to use this or not, is a thre*****t to civil society; hence, ***** ***** decision ***** deny him his rights to *****ar arms is considered just, in the collectivist's point of view.

***** (2003) argued against Busch's position regarding the interpretation ***** t***** right. For him, the right to bear arms is considered part of

. . . . [END OF DISSERTATION PREVIEW]

Download complete paper (and others like it)    |    Order a one-of-a-kind, custom paper

© 2001–2016   |   Thesis Paper about Right to Bear Arms Should Civil Society Have the Right   |   Dissertation Examples