Essay - Right to Bear Arms Should Civil Society Have the Right...

Copyright Notice

Right to bear arms

Should civil society have the right ***** bear *****? A Critical Look on the Issue of Individualism and Collectivism in ***** Interpretation ***** the Second Amendment

In the United States Constitution, the Second Amendment conta*****s the *****s of citizens as individuals, ***** which ***** 'right to ***** arms' is considered part of the conditions stated. The issue ***** a citizen's right ***** bear arms, or guns, is a debate that has remained unresolved, especially if a controversi*****l or celebrated case concerning the right to bear arms is in focus.

***** research provides an alternative way of looking at this issue, wherein ***** ***** of the right to bear ***** is argued based on the judicial system's interpret*****ion ***** th***** *****: whe*****r the right to ***** arms should be interpreted ***** on an individualist ***** collectivist point of view.

***** thesis that will be discussed in this paper assumes the stance that the right to bear arms should be based on a collectivist view, for every individual right, if subjected ***** interpretations favoring ***** purposes only, would defeat ***** objectives of the ********** of the Constitution itself. Thus, in accordance to ***** objectives of the Constitution, which is to guide both ***** society ***** the political system in governance and ***** ensure social order, ***** right to *****ar ***** must be interpreted in the context of the individual vis-a-vis his/her rights' effect on ***** *****. Thus, ***** the right to bear arms caused or will cause detriment to the civil society, then this ***** should not be ***** an argument for ***** individual to still attain this right, and held not liable ***** whatever ***** the attainment of such right has for the civil ***** or ********** community.

***** ***** of view was subsisted in Busch's (2003) analysis of the ***** United States vs. Emerson, where***** the issue of the right to bear arms surfaced. In analyzing the Court's decision to defer Emerson's ***** ***** ***** arms, Busch stated that ***** decision ***** made because the Court's decision was "collective" in nature, where***** the welfare ***** the civil society, ***** the danger posed by Emerson became the contentions against his case. In asserting that the right to bear arms must be interpreted in the ***** po*****t of view, the author rationalized that "***** more collectively the right is interpreted, the more broadly Congress can legislate to restrict the ***** to ********** arms" (347). In effect, what made sense in Busch's analysis is that this particular right, as stated ***** the Constitution, must be ***** in the proper *****. Thus, ***** ownership ***** a gun for militia *****, whether he ***** the intent to use this or *****, is a thre*****t to civil ********** hence, the Court's decision to deny him his rights to bear arms is considered just, in ***** collectivist's point of view.

***** (2003) argued ***** Busch's position regarding the interpretation ***** ***** right. For him, the right to bear arms is ***** part of


Download full paper (and others like it)    |    Order a one-of-a-kind, custom paper

© 2001–2015   |   Essay on Right to Bear Arms Should Civil Society Have the Right   |   Essays Writing