Essay - Would You Torture an Animal? Animal Testing is Both a...

Copyright Notice

Would You Torture an Animal?

***** testing is both a controversi*****l ********** highly emotional topic. While many people believe that animal testing is inhumane, many others see it as an important part of preserving human life. In my opinion, animal *****, due to the harsh nature of the process, should only be conducted if ***** is necessary to advance science and technology that may help save lives.

If I were working in a research lab and was ********** in the development of a revolutionary skin graft that would ***** lives, I would definitely support animal testing for ***** product. In th***** case, animal testing would ***** a necessary process in ***** the effects of the new development.

Without animal test*****g, this development would not be approved by the government. As a result, millions of lives would be affected, especially those of accident victims that may be saved by the skin *****.

While I am against torturing animals to test products like lipstick and shampoo, I am convinced ***** animal testing has greatly advanced the medical field. Many researchers have used animals to test products that have saved millions of lives. ***** addition, the world's quality of life has been vastly improved as a ***** ***** these tests.

***** ex*****ple, without the use of animals in medical *****, we may never ***** gotten access to cures for rabies, me*****les and tuberculosis. Our scientists may have ***** gained a firm understanding of how the brain works. In *****, millions of ***** ***** ***** died, as open-heart surgery and heart valve replacement ***** both developed using animal testing.

***** a research worker, ***** main concern, when developing ***** ***** graft, would be the validity and safety of ***** development. Animal testing would be ***** in determ*****ing side effects or possible problems. If ***** were ***** *****d to test this new *****, it would ***** difficult, if not impossible, ***** determine how it would affect humans. I would not feel com*****table sending the product to hospitals if it was not thoroughly tested and I know that the government would not approve *****.

Serious injury, worsening of health condition, severe defects, or even death could be caused ***** an untested development. To prevent ***** from happening, the ***** de*****ment should use the minimal number ***** animal to test the skin graft.

***** would want ***** be a major part of the animal testing, rather than pass the responsibility to a labora*****ry technician. By taking a signific*****nt role in the process, I would ensure that the department ********** as few animals as possible and took all precautions necessary to make the process painless for the animals used.

********** my opinion, the advances ***** positive results of animal ***** definitely outweigh the negative *****pects of the process. Many people who protest against animal testing do so ***** supplying the ***** industry with alternatives to ***** testing.

***** present, ***** testing is ***** for the preservation of human life. I believe it is necessary ***** success of the


Download full paper (and others like it)    |    Order a brand new, custom-written paper

Other topics that might interest you:

© 2001–2016   |   Dissertations about Would You Torture an Animal? Animal Testing is Both a   |   Essay Writing