Essay - Would You Torture an Animal? Animal Testing is Both a...


1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85
Copyright Notice

Would You Torture an Animal?

Animal testing is both a controversi*****l and highly emotional topic. While many people believe that animal testing is inhumane, many others see it as an important part of preserving human life. In my opinion, animal testing, due to the harsh nature of ***** process, should only be conducted if it is necessary to advance science ***** technology ***** may help save lives.

If I were working in a research lab and was *****volved in the development of a revolutionary skin graft that would save lives, I ***** definitely support ***** testing for the product. In this case, animal testing would be a necessary process in testing ***** effects of the new development.

Without animal testing, this development would not be approved by the government. As a result, millions of lives would be affected, especially those ***** accident victims that may be saved by ***** skin *****.

***** I am against torturing animals to test products like lipstick ***** shampoo, I am convinced ***** animal ***** has greatly advanced the medical field. Many ********** have used animals to test products that have saved millions of lives. ***** addition, the world's quality of life has been vastly improved as a ***** of these tests.

For example, without the use of animals in medical testing, we may never ***** gotten access ***** cures for rabies, measles and tuberculosis. Our scientists may have never gained a firm understanding of how the brain works. In *****, millions of ***** would ***** died, as open-heart surgery and heart valve replacement were both developed using animal testing.

***** a research worker, my main concern, when developing the ***** graft, ***** be the validity ***** safety of the *****. Animal testing would be necessary in determining side effects or possible problems. If ***** ***** not ***** to test this ***** development, it would be difficult, if ***** impossible, to determine how it ***** affect humans. I would not feel com*****table sending the product to hospitals if it was not th*****oughly tested and I know that the government would ***** approve it.

Serious injury, worsening of health cond*****ion, severe defects, or even death could be ca*****d by an untested development. To prevent this from happening, the ***** de*****ment ***** use the minimal number of ***** to test the skin graft.

***** would w*****t ***** be a m*****jor part ***** the animal testing, ra*****r than pass the responsibility to a labora*****ry technician. By taking a significant role in ***** process, I ***** ensure ***** the de*****ment used as few animals as possible and took all precautions necessary to make ***** process painless for the animals *****.

***** my opinion, the advances ***** positive results of animal testing definitely outweigh the negative aspects of the *****. Many people who protest against animal testing do so ***** supplying the medical industry with alternatives to the testing.

***** present, animal testing is ***** for ***** preservation ***** human life. I believe it ***** necessary ***** success of the

. . . . [END OF RESEARCH PAPER PREVIEW]

Download full paper (and others like it)    |    Order a one-of-a-kind, custom paper

© 2001–2017   |   Term Papers on Would You Torture an Animal? Animal Testing is Both a   |   Essays Sample