Home  >  Subjects  >  current page My Profile

Essays on "Gun Control / Rights / 2nd Amendment"  |  Term Papers 1-40

 1 2 3 . . . Last › Filter Options:  

Gun Control: Restricting Rights or

Guns are still a big problem in the United States. The events of December 2012, where a gunman entered an Elementary School and killed 27 people, 20 being school going children reignited the debate on gun control ("Guns and Gun Control," 2013). This unfortunate event caused the supporters of pro-gun laws e.g. The NRA come up with proposals that would see school guards being armed to prevent a recurrence of the same. In January of 2013, President Obama called for tougher Congress-backed gun laws that would confront the escalating cases of gun violence and mass murders. In his submission, the president proposed a plan that would see the adoption of stringent background checks, prohibit the sale of assault rifles and tighten the noose on gun trafficking laws. The president further promised an increase in inter-agencies flow of information to ensure that illegal guns not are found in the hands of criminals ("Guns and Gun Control," 2013). Aside from the president's commitment to Gun control, Governors and other State administrators have also moved to ensure that the escalating problem of gun violence is brought under control. For instance, Governor Cuomo of New York proposed a package of amendments to the gun laws that would see the expansion of State's ban on assault weapons. The amendments will also assure that individuals with mental impairments are not allowed possession of firearms. Gov. Malloy of Connecticut has also made a commitment to pursue the issue of gun control with a bias on school safety ("Guns and Gun Control," 2013). Statistics indicate that more Republicans own gun than the Democrats do. This disparity in gun possession might be inspired by the fact that Republicans are more pro-gun than the Democrats. Gun possession is seen as a major predicator or determinant of one's political alignment. More pro-gun Bills are lined up for discussion, some proposing a law that will allow people to carry concealed weapons to virtually all places in the guise of self-defense. Recommendations From the discourse just ended, it is apparent that pro-gun laws are not ideal for the American people. This assertion has been arrived at after a careful look at the number of fatal gun violence and mass shootings that have been witnessed in the recent past. However, since the Second Amendment safeguards the right to possess a gun, I would move to recommend that stricter gun control laws be legislated and…

Pages: 3  |  Article Review  |  Style: n/a  |  Sources: 1


Gun Control: Restricting Rights or

The measures of procuring a gun are also equally to blame for the cases of gun violations. There are no clear guidelines as to who should own a gun (Spitzer, 2009). Moreover, when the person is buying a gun, the background checks on the buyer are not effective. Additionally, the period of waiting after ordering an arm is short to facilitate scrutiny of the gun buyer. In addition, the federal law is ambiguous since it does not set a minimum age for one to own a firearm. Therefore, these weaknesses in the constitution cause the call for the strict gun control by the liberals who are on the lookout for protecting the larger interests of the society. However, the opposition of the gun control measures has the view that these laws will deny the people their individual rights. According to the American bill of rights, those in opposition of gun control argue that they have the right to secure their homes and property (Spitzer, 2009). Also, the people have right to possess an arm according to the Second Amendment. This is the first reason why the gun control is facing stiff challenges. The law itself allows for people to argue that their personal right is being restricted. They have the right to guard their possessions and own the arms, thus the reason they have the lee way to own guns. Secondly, vested interests in the industry of ammunition such as National Rifle Association and other parties are of the view that their personal corporate rights to trade are being violated. This causes that not in favor of guns control to have access to the guns easily. Also, the making and involvement of government in regulating the guns is thwarted from these parties with vested interest in the industry (Nemerov, 2008). Moreover, the argument that people with guns can help to curb those with the thugs is also another reason. Those with guns argue that the thugs and those who cause these unnecessary shootings are the ones who ignore the present laws. Therefore, it is not fair to deprive them of their right because of a few elements that are negative. The republicans and even democrats have tried to bring forth amendments that seek to regulate the guns ownership and access. Still, it is notable that nearly all of these proposed amendments never pass the test of the House due to…

Pages: 4  |  Research Paper  |  Style: n/a  |  Sources: 5


For or Against Federal Gun Control

¶ … Federal Gun Control Gun control is one of the hot topics today in the U.S. Consequence of the recent events involving mass shootings, the government is seriously reconsidering its policy regarding this aspect and is trying to find solutions to decrease the incidence of such tragic outcomes. However, finding the right approach is far from easy, as U.S.…

Pages: 5  |  Essay  |  Style: n/a  |  Sources: 2


1st and 2nd Amendments

¶ … 2nd Amendments First Amendment & Second Amendment to the U.S. Constitution Basically the First Amendment of the Bill of Rights reads: "Congress shall make no law" that restricts the right of American citizens to choose their religion and practice their religion, and Congress cannot pass laws that take away the right of free speech, or the right of the press to print whatever it wishes; and also the right of people to assemble peacefully to protest to the government cannot be restricted (http://caselaw.lp.findlaw.com). The Second Amendment is short and to the point: "A well regulated militia, being necessary to the security of a free state, the right of the people to keep and bear arms, shall not be infringed" (http://caselaw.lp.findlaw.com). TWO: (Reporters protecting sources) Recently the U.S. House of Representatives passed legislation that is supposed to ensure the right or reporters to protect their confidential sources. The vote was 398 to 21, and overwhelming victory for the legislators who wish to protect legitimate journalists from being thrown in jail for not disclosing where they obtained information that was used in the writing of their news reports, according to a story in USA Today (Abrams, 2007). The U.S. Senate has not taken up the issue yet. Freedom of the press is fundamental to our democracy and it is fundamental to our security," said the Speaker of the House, Nancy Pelosi (Abrams, 2007). But the White House said it would veto the bill if it passes the Senate; the freedom that journalists have to report and protect their sources "could severely frustrate - and in some cases completely eviscerate - the ability to investigate acts of terrorism or threats to national security," Jim Abrams of AP writes. The bill was co-sponsored by a Republican (Mike Pence of Indiana) and a Democrat (Rick Boucher of Virginia); Pence said the legislation is not about "protecting reporters; it's about protecting the public's right to know." The issue has come up before Congress because over the past 3 years, more than 40 cases have come to light where reporters were ordered identify their sources or go to jail. One of the more high-profile cases of a reporter going to jail for refusing to reveal sources was Judith Miller, a journalist with the New York Times, who served 85 days in prison in the Valerie Plame Wilson CIA leak case. TWO: (Separation of church and…

Pages: 2  |  Term Paper  |  Style: APA  |  Sources: 5


Gun Control in NY State

¶ … Gun Control in New York State: The New York State law about gun registration before 1996 required an individual to apply for a handgun permit depending on various factors. This included residence or business permit, hunting and targeting shooting, unrestricted concealed carry, and employment concealed carry. As a result of these requirements, people with any kind of carry…

Pages: 10  |  Term Paper  |  Style: n/a  |  Sources: 15


Gun Control Laws & Regulations

However the NRA is of the contrary view. The advocates of NRA do not accept any relationship with the gun violence, massacre, and crime in relation to loose controls on guns in the country. The country is also facing multiple security and criminal issues instigated by the usage of guns. However most of the influential advocates of gun possession do…

Pages: 10  |  Research Paper  |  Style: n/a  |  Sources: 8


Guns Control Gun Control Gun

Lastly, gun control has the benefit of reduction in assault and domestic violence cases. These are common in family setups that experience frequent disagreements. In U.S., assaults and domestic violence are common and result in separation and divorce between couples. Extreme cases do result in death of one or both parties to the disagreement. Many a times, there is use…

Pages: 7  |  Essay  |  Style: n/a  |  Sources: 7


Gun Control Laws and the

" (Liptak, 2008, p.1) According to Professor Kleck, the "period it studied was too short and the suburbs were a poor point of reference. The place most like D.C. is Baltimore…It's a virtual twin city." (Liptak, 2008, p.1) Krouse The work of William J. Krouse (2012), a specialist in Domestic Security and Crime Policy, entitled "Gun Control Legislation" reports Congress…

Pages: 10  |  Research Paper  |  Style: n/a  |  Sources: 12


2nd Amendment the Right to Bear Arms

Second Amendment Rights: A Discussion The Second Amendment, while developed long ago, is still extremely relevant today as evidenced by the huge political and cultural firestorm created any time gun rights are put into question. We will take a look at the Second Amendment; determine its relevance, the pros vs. cons, and whether gun control works. We will also discuss…

Pages: 9  |  Term Paper  |  Style: n/a  |  Sources: 5


Gun Control vs. Crime

In order to be able to get a better understanding of firearms and the degree to which they are available to the masses one needs to focus on types of firearms and the attitudes that the authorities put across them. Machine guns, for example, are considered to be extreme firearms and it is required that every machine gun in Virginia…

Pages: 10  |  Capstone Project  |  Style: APA  |  Sources: 5


Gun Control as a Social Problem

Gun Control as a Social Problem A recent report in the Washington Post states the following: More than 4,000 children and teenagers are killed by guns every year in the United States. That tragedy is drawing thousands of marchers to Washington this week. The organizers, who are calling the Mother's Day event the Million Mom March, want stricter gun laws.…

Pages: 5  |  Research Proposal  |  Style: n/a  |  Sources: 4


Gun Control Is One of

So there appears to be a political motive to gun control, just as there is a political motive to arguing against gun control. This leaves us with a challenge in trying to determine whether we should stand on the side of gun control or not. Clearly, you cannot trust the statistics. One minute somebody highlights an increased murder rate, the…

Pages: 4  |  Essay  |  Style: n/a  |  Sources: 0


Gun Control and Crime in the Black Community

Gun Control and Crime In the literature review, we will examine the impact that possible gun control laws could have on: the African-American community and violent crime rates. This will provide specific insights about how this could affect: homicide and fatality figures that are being reported. The article that was written by Blumstein (2000), discusses the impact of various gun control laws during the 1990's on the crime rate. As they found, that they helped to: reduce the number of available weapons and they gave the police the tools; to effectively go after some of the most violent offenders. However, the author also discovered that this approach was effective, because it was used in conjunction with stiffer drug control laws. The information from this source is important, because it shows how various gun control laws were effective at addressing the rises in violent crimes within the African-American community. The article that was written by Kwon (1997), talks about the impact that state and municipal gun control laws had on violent crime rates. They found that while they did have some effect, other factors played a major role that contributed to the decline. The most notable include: poverty levels, the unemployment rate and alcohol consumption. These different elements are important, because they are illustrating how there are other factors that will have an effect on the underlying unemployment rate. As a result, this information is useful in showing how these factors are playing role in gun related homicide rates. The piece of literature that was written by Carter (2002), discusses the history of gun control laws. as, a variety of statues have been enacted to address the underlying problems with gun related violence. However, this has proven to be challenging for many advocates of gun control. With a host of organizations (such as the NRA) watering down: the legislation and enforcement (based on Second Amendment concerns). The information from this source is useful, because it illustrates the heated contention about any kind of: possible changes or stepped up enforcement standards of these laws. (Carter, 2002, pp. 308 -- 309) The……

Pages: 2  |  "Literature Review" Chapter  |  Style: n/a  |  Sources: 6


Gun Control Debate Aside From a Very

Gun Control Debate Aside from a very few other problems of contemporary import in American society, gun control ranks as one of the most hotly contested issues. From semantic arguments over the Second Amendment of the U.S. Constitution to statistical analyses of crime rates to philosophical debates about individual vs. collective rights, there seems to be little room for moderate…

Pages: 10  |  Term Paper  |  Style: APA  |  Sources: 10


Gun Control Is Not Effective Against Criminals

Gun Control Is Not Effective Against Criminals If criminals want guns, they will get them, whether there is a law against it or not. What gun control laws do is make it more difficult for ordinary citizens to obtain firearms to protect themselves. Most criminals don't visit a gun shop and register, then wait the mandatory time, and then go…

Pages: 6  |  Thesis  |  Style: APA  |  Sources: 0


Anti-Gun Control

Anti Gun Control Despite Constitutional protection of the "right of the people to keep and bear arms" embedded in the Second Amendment, gun control remains a hotly debated political issue. As if the Constitution did not clearly state that the right to bear arms is as fundamental as the right to free speech, gun control advocates continue to barrage the media with misleading messages about the damage weapons do to American society. The Second Amendment guarantees that the right of the people to keep and bear arms "shall not be infringed," meaning that gun control is a moot point: an issue that should not be debated in the first place. Gun violence is a problem; criminal behavior is a problem. However, guns are not the root cause of the problems endemic in American society. Guns have become a convenient political scapegoat to avoid dealing directly with the core issues that prompt gun-related violence, deaths, and massacres. If the children responsible for the Columbine incident or Virginia Tech did not have access to guns, they would have used other weapons at their disposal. In fact, the problems with American society are not related to the possession of firearms but to deeper causes including an unraveling of ethics and morals. Preserving civil liberties such as the right to bear arms embedded in the Second Amendment demands a consistent application of the law. Restricting one civil liberty can unravel the whole fabric of the system, enabling hypocrisy and the slow, steady erosion of the rights Americans hold dearest. For example, any restriction on the freedom of speech can be viewed as a violation of civil liberties. Any restriction on the right to bear arms not only violates constitutional law -- which clearly states that the right to bear arms "shall not be infringed" -- but also violates core American values. Freedom is the essence of American society. The Brady Campaign remains the most vocal political lobbying group for gun control. Started by Jim Brady in the wake of his being shot during the assassination attempt on President Reagan, the organization is now responsible for spearheading anti-gun programs in Washington. Granted, the issues the Brady Campaign and other gun control groups raise are plausible. Guns often fall into the hands of immoral, violent criminals. Lax gun laws allow criminals to get a hold of guns, and therefore, argues the Brady Campaign, laws should restrict…

Pages: 4  |  Term Paper  |  Style: APA  |  Sources: 5


Controversial Topic of Gun Control in America

¶ … Controversial topic of gun control in America [...] why tighter gun control laws are necessary and how to achieve these laws. Gun control is one of the most contentious arguments in America today. Proponents of gun control maintain it will save lives and keep guns out of the hands of criminals and gangs. Opponents believe the Second Amendment…

Pages: 4  |  Term Paper  |  Style: MLA  |  Sources: 4


Gun Control in the U.S. One of

¶ … Gun Control in the U.S. One of the controversial topics in the United States today is the issue of gun control. The Second Amendment to the United States Constitution guarantees the right to bear arms for self-defense. There is no doubt that the founding fathers of this nation had good reasons to pass the Second Amendment bill, but the circumstances have changed and the American realities today are different. The rate of homicides, including those involving guns, in the United States has reached frightening proportions. The right to carry guns should be allowed for law-abiding citizens but the regulation of gun possession must be stronger, otherwise the use of guns by deranged people who manage to kill human beings with guns will unfortunately continue. The question of gun control has become an issue of utmost importance. It is important to decree a restrictive gun licensing system because the easy availability of guns leads to more deaths. The homicide and suicide rates in the United States are one of the highest in the world, and the highest in developed countries. Cross-country comparative studies, comparing the United States with countries that have similar political and social culture such as Canada, England, and New Zealand, have revealed that none of those have the same level of homicide and suicide rates (Hemenway). It is true that many of the homicides did not involve guns but it is also true that the availability of guns greatly increased the likelihood of deaths. When the issue of gun control is raised, supporters of gun possession say that it is a constitutional right. They are right, but the Constitution was written over two hundred years ago and the founding fathers, as smart as they, could not have envisioned the realities of the twenty-first century. The Constitution remains our most cherished document but sometimes the Amendments might be needed to change its provisions. There is no need to make sentimental arguments, as some supporters of gun possession do, that the Constitution cannot be considered outdated. Yes, it can; otherwise, we would never have Amendments that ended slavery and permitted women to vote in national elections. One of the most oft-repeated claims by gun supporters is that "guns don't kill people, people kill people." That statement is technically correct but is also overly simplistic. Guns do not kill people but they make it much easier to kill. There…

Pages: 3  |  Term Paper  |  Style: n/a  |  Sources: 3


Difficulty of Starting a Gun Control Debate

¶ … difficulty of starting a gun control debate in the United States. At first blush, the topic itself seems ridiculous. Between the NRA and extremist groups on the left, one would assume that the United States already has a vigorous gun control debate. However, these special-interest groups do not comprise the entirety of the public sphere. On the contrary,…

Pages: 8  |  Essay  |  Style: n/a  |  Sources: 8


Gun Control Legislation the Gun

Consider what would happen if suddenly private citizens in America were no longer permitted to obtain or possess firearms legally. There would be social upheaval. There would be political upheaval. The country would be discontent. Consider the example of the illegalization of alcohol during the early 20th century in America. When prohibition was in effect, there was still alcohol consumption…

Pages: 4  |  Essay  |  Style: n/a  |  Sources: 4


Gun Ownership and Gun Control

(Youth Violence Statistics, Pg 2) In 2002, gang members were responsible for over three hundred homicides. (City Declares War on Gangs, Pg 2) Gang culture - much like militia culture - revolves around respect for firearms. Gang members take a great deal of pride in their guns and they take pride in their killing. Violence by gang members in big…

Pages: 15  |  Term Paper  |  Style: n/a  |  Sources: 0


Gun Control in the US

Our country obtained its independence with guns, kept its independence with guns, and weapons will perform an important move in maintaining our independence. Why would some incident in Chicago, Illinois warrant the banning of all guns that we have the right of using to safeguard ourselves? Lawfully they cannot. The attractiveness of the constitution is that it can be modified. The ancestors realized they could not anticipate the future, thus made the constitution a pliable document (Goss 70). The simple remedy is to change the constitution in order to curb the incidences that have occurred in recent times. Nevertheless, modern times still seem to be very suitable with weapons. There is no questioning that this discussion is very sensitive. Ultimately, people have to consider gun control a violation on self-defense, an overblown public anxiety, and most significantly of all, oppression against the law-abiding people of this great country. Works Cited Bruce, John M, & Clyde Wilcox. The Changing Politics of Gun Control. Lanham, Md: Rowman & Littlefield, 2008. Print. Carter, Gregg L. Gun Control in the United States: A Reference Handbook. Santa Barbara: ABC-CLIO, 2006. Internet resource. Crooker, Constance E. Gun Control and Gun Rights. Westport (Conn.: Greenwood press, 2013. Print. Goss, Kristin A. Disarmed: The Missing Movement for Gun Control in America. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2010. Internet resource. Lott, John R. More Guns, Less……

Pages: 5  |  Research Paper  |  Style: MLA  |  Sources: 4


Gun Control, Including Counter Arguments.

Another expert writes, "Three decades of polling have painted a clear picture of public opinion about gun control. These polls show that public support for the regulation of firearms is strong, deep, and widespread" (Smith, 2002). Many proponents believe gun control would reduce violent crime, and that specific gun control measures, such as handgun control, would be even more suitable…

Pages: 7  |  Term Paper  |  Style: n/a  |  Sources: 8


Gun Control Is One of Today's More

Gun control is one of today's more divisive political issues, and people on both sides of the issue have stereotypes about what types of people support and oppose gun control. Increasingly, the question of gun control has become politicized, with the far right asserting that Republicans are the party for gun rights and Democrats advocate gun control. However, that assertion…

Pages: 5  |  Thesis  |  Style: MLA  |  Sources: 4


Gun Control in the 21st Century, the

Gun Control In the 21st century, the legislature should make the ability to bear arms a privilege instead of a right. Whether American citizens should have the unfettered right to bear arms and own guns, has been one of the most hotly debated and contentious issues ever since the Second Amendment was added to the U.S. Constitution as part of…

Pages: 15  |  Term Paper  |  Style: n/a  |  Sources: 5


Gun Trafficking

¶ … Gun Control and Gun Trafficking The objective of this work is the research the relationship between gun control and gun trafficking in an argumentative style of work with the goal of persuading a college-educated audience of the consequences of tighter gun control. Used will be a supply and demand argument such as in the case of alcohol and…

Pages: 7  |  Term Paper  |  Style: MLA  |  Sources: 10


We Should Increasing Gun Control to Increase Safety

¶ … Gun Control to Increase Safety We Should Increase Gun Control to Increase Safety The aim of this paper is to tackle the sensible topic of gun control and the individual approach to recur to violence in desperate times. Without any doubt, if the individual is not guided in the right direction, he is not capable to make the…

Pages: 5  |  Term Paper  |  Style: MLA  |  Sources: 6


Sensible Gun Control Laws an Analysis of

¶ … Sensible Gun Control Laws An Analysis of the Need for More Sensible Gun Control Laws in the United States Today Introduction common assertion heard among gun control opponents in the United States has been, "They will take my gun from me when they can pry it from my cold, dead fingers." This unwavering position has largely been based…

Pages: 5  |  Term Paper  |  Style: n/a  |  Sources: 0


Gun Control and Laws Regulating This Issue

Gun Control and laws regulating this issue in the United States have been a controversial topic of debate for more than a decade. Since the inception of extreme gun control laws during the end of the 1980's, the debate of how much crime is really prevented by gun control laws has raged on. It appears that the government and other anti-gun extremists have sided together against others in society who feel that public possession of guns should not be subjected to such extreme laws. Below then is an exploration of these varied opinions, including that of the Bush Administration, some of its opponents, the NRA and issues sparked by the Brady Law. The Bush Administration The 1994 assault weapons law entails that the manufacture and importation of certain types of semi-automatic rifles are banned, along with magazines of more than 10 rounds. Public outrage and debate has been sparked by an assertion from the Bush administration that this law will be reauthorized, as it was set to expire in September 2004. The Libertarian Party acts as one of the representatives of the public outcry. According to the Party, the fact that the President has renewed the ban on assault rifles results in a certain message being relayed to terrorists and criminals in the United States. Indeed, specifically the objection is that homeland security is being undermined by a law that is primarily aimed at law-abiding citizens. Criminals on the other hand deem themselves above the law, rendering any gun control laws obsolete and absolutely ineffective. The Party argues that Americans are vulnerable to criminals when they are not allowed to protect themselves. Furthermore it is said that the government cannot protect everyone in the country at the same time, and the only other reasonable recourse is to let law-abiding members of society protect themselves. The law then, according to these critics places power in the hands of criminals and terrorists, while disempowering those in society most in need of protection. According to Thurman, on the other hand, the Bush administration appears to have changed its stance during 2002, and when it declared that the right of an individual to own a firearm is constitutionally protected, outcries rose from the opposite extreme, represented by anti-gun forces. The opinion in this case is that gun violence would be perpetuated by allowing individuals not so required by their profession to possess guns. Indeed,…

Pages: 3  |  Term Paper  |  Style: n/a  |  Sources: 0


Gun Control Is Largely an

To the founders of the United States, private citizens were vital to the freedom of the nation, and their right to be armed with firearms was an essential part of this right. Federalist Noah Weber wrote "supreme power in America cannot enforce unjust laws by the sword; because the whole body of the people are armed, and constitute a force superior to any band of regular troops that can be, on any pretence, raised in the United States" (Lee). Opponents of gun control also argue that guns themselves are not the cause of crime. Further, they argue that the number of guns in a society is not linked to the amount of crime. Bans on the sale of specific types of weapons have not been shown to reduce violent crime. In Switzerland, pistols and fully automatic assault rifles are owned by all adult males and handguns are available to all adults without mental defects or a criminal record. However, the country has far less crime per capita than the United States, and has low levels of gun-related crime (Kopel). In addition, gun ownership seems to act as a deterrent against crime. In some studies, criminals have stated that they have failed to commit a crime out of fear that the victim would have a gun. Similarly, a highly publicized training program (where Florida police trained 2,500 women in gun use) saw a reduction in rape by 88% the next year. Felonies dropped significantly during a 1974 police strike in Albuquerque where armed citizens patrolled shops and neighborhoods (Kopel). Further, it can be argued that gun control has been linked to racial discrimination. African-Americans were once banned from owning guns, and the earliest gun control laws in the south were described by a federal judge around 1900 as "passed for the purpose of disarming the negro laborers . . . [and] never intended to be applied to the white population" (Kopel). Further, blacks are more at risk for racially motivated violence, burglary, and robbery, thus placing them at greater risk from controls that limit their ownership or use of guns (Kopel). These arguments can also be applied to women. Only seven percent of rapists use guns, thus gun control would not likely dramatically reduce rape. At the same time, gun control could dramatically reduce the ability of a woman to defend herself against a would-be rapist (Kopel). In conclusion, the arguments…

Pages: 3  |  Term Paper  |  Style: n/a  |  Sources: 0


Anti-Gun Control

Anti-Gun Control Gun control is an issue of passionate debate in the United States. In fact, the issue stirs almost as much passion as the abortion issue. Both sides are adamant about their beliefs and rights. Both sides believe that they are points are logical and true, the issue of gun control is not quite that simple, nor it is…

Pages: 15  |  Term Paper  |  Style: n/a  |  Sources: 0


Gun Control Changed by Customer in Comments

Gun Control Changed by customer in comments Public problem: Why gun laws need to be changed Causes of the problem A number of recent, highly-publicized incidents involving firearms, including the shooting at a movie theater in Colorado and the Sandy Hook Elementary School massacre in Connecticut, have brought the issue of gun violence to the forefront. Advocates for gun control have pinpointed the problem of insufficient background checks (particularly for private sales, gun show sales, and Internet sales) and the availability of high-powered firearms that have no use in legal forms of sportsmanship, such as target practice and hunting. However, the American culture of gun ownership, the lobbying power of the NRA, and a strict constructionist interpretation of the Second Amendment have all been cited as reasons why even moderate gun control proposals are so difficult to pass, despite polls that indicate that the American public as a whole overwhelmingly supports such measures. Potential remedies A number of proposed solutions to the problems of gun violence have all been defeated in some form by the American political system, including the recent Manchin-Toomey gun control bill (Pickler 2013). One of the most commonly proposed forms of gun control is an assault weapons ban. The argument for banning such weapons is that they make it considerably easier for violent acts to have far-reaching consequences, given the speed with which the shooter is able to fire bullets without reloading. Expanded background checks and a national database to keep track of gun owners have also been proposed, to ensure that persons who are mentally ill or have criminal records cannot have access to firearms. The defeated senate bill had a "requirement that background checks cover every firearm sold, whether at gun shows, the Internet or private sales" (Johns 2013). However, President Obama is attempting to use his powers to circumvent this: "Federal law bans certain mentally ill people from purchasing firearms, but not all states are providing data to stop the prohibited sales to the FBI's background check system. A federal review last year found 17 states contributed fewer than 10 mental health records to the database, meaning many deemed by a judge to be a danger still could have access to guns. The Obama administration was starting a process Friday aimed at removing barriers in health privacy laws that prevent some states from reporting information to the background check system" (Pickler 2013). Some…

Pages: 3  |  A-Level Outline Answer  |  Style: n/a  |  Sources: 3


Gun Control Legislation Gun Control

There are also several competitions throughout the country in bull's eye, bench rest, silhouette, practical pistol, trap and skeet, and other shooting sports. Men, women, older children, and even individuals with certain disabilities can enjoy these sports since shooting does not require much agility or physical strength. Even without formal competition, shooting can be enjoyed as a hobby. Recreational shooting may involve paper targets, tin cans, or other suitable targets. This hobby can be appreciate at indoor target range, but is typical practiced outdoors. In fact, shooting can often be combined with other enjoyable outdoor activities, such as hiking, camping, and sight seeing. Throughout history, violence has overwhelmed the human race. Since ancient times the brawny has preyed on the weak and the meek. We have approved laws to protect society, but the violence continues. Laws attempt to change human deeds, but laws are not able to change human panorama. Laws are not enough to protect people from hostility. We must allow people the means to protect themselves. Protection is a major reason that about half of all Americans own a firearm. Everyone deserves to be safe, but not everyone has the physical ability to defend himself or herself. Firearms are the most effective tools used today for self-defense, but they are only useful if they are accessible. Firearms can be dangerous in the wrong hand that is why I consider firearm training is important. The best training consists of parents passing on our firearm heritage, respect for people and property, and some common sense safety rules to their children. For many people this training will be enough. Formal firearms training courses, like Hunter Safety Courses and the course required to gain a concealed carry permit, are also very useful. These courses reinforce the fundamental safety rules that everyone who handles firearms should know. They also teach the legal requirements specific to hunting or self-defense, depending on the course. Society does benefit from firearms in the hands of responsible citizens. It is our responsibility to use them properly and safely. A recognize that criminals have misused firearms, often with tragic results, but I must point out that only few individuals committed those crimes. We should punish the individuals who commit these crimes, and we should imprison those who pose a threat to society so that they do not have the chance to cause harm. Punishing law-abiding citizens by passing restrictive…

Pages: 2  |  Term Paper  |  Style: n/a  |  Sources: 0


Gun Control Problems in

2.The federal government should aid and maintain state efforts to raise the standard and encourage consistency of state gun laws, along with intensification of achievement and enforcement. 3.At least, all state gun laws should be in harmony with the federal law. At present, this would mean a minimum age limit of 18 for ownership of any gun, and 21 for purchase of a handgun from a dealer. 4.All states should move in the direction of dependable rigid frameworks based on licensing of firearm owners and registration of guns. States should execute basic anti-trafficking measures, in particular one-gun-a-month laws. 5.States should close the ambiguity between the regulation of primary and secondary sales, by necessitating the same age limits and background assessments for new and used guns. 6.principal state legislators on the subject of gun violence prevention from all 50 states should form a countrywide network to organize efforts and develop model legislation. 7.Investigators should carry out well-designed studies to assess various gun laws and assess the role of completion and other factors in their effectiveness. Conclusion The dearth of firearms is not conflicting with orderly public life, nor is it an essential or an adequate condition of social peace. A condition can and sometimes does lend itself to disaster. Whether one deems the matter theoretically as one of theory or concretely as one of experience, universal disarmament is no more a hopeful road to public amity The case for an armed citizenry is not to promote the project of making war on one's neighbor with arms but to oblige with one's neighbor in the use of arms. The Constitution's Second Amendment is unequivocally of this cast of mind. As the Supreme Court has accepted, the Second Amendment contemplates that the militia -- "all males physically capable of acting in concert for the common defense" -- will, when called, "appear bearing arms supplied by themselves and of the kind in common use at the time."(United States v. Miller) Works Cited News Brief. The Daily Texan. 101, No. 158, 14 June, 2001. http://www.tsp.utexas.edu/webarchive/06-14-01/PF2001061403_s01_Brief.html Briggs, B. Bruce. The Great American Gun War. PUBLIC INTEREST. 45 (1976). Wright, James, Rossi, Peter and Daly, Kathleen. UNDER the GUN: WEAPONS, CRIME, and VIOLENCE in AMERICA Aldine Publishing Company (1983). Scherer, Ron and Lafranchi, Howard. "New Gun Trade: Turning Them in" in: THE CHRISTIAN SCIENCE MONITOR, 4 May 2000. Vass, Nathan, "Extra time for gun crimes." SUNDAY TELEGRAPH,…

Pages: 7  |  Term Paper  |  Style: n/a  |  Sources: 0


Gun Control Is One of Today's More

Gun control is one of today's more divisive political issues, and people on both sides of the issue have stereotypes about the types of people who support and oppose gun control. Moreover, the gun control debate is a relatively recent one, because the lack of available affordable mass-reproduced firearms throughout most of America's history meant that most Americans could not…

Pages: 7  |  Essay  |  Style: n/a  |  Sources: 7


Gun Controls "Studies Have Shown

Contrarily, such revelations findings recommend that high saturations of guns in places or something associated with that condition, have impediments to the illegal hostility. Gurr has revealed that handgun ban would criminalize much of the citizenry however, have little influence on criminals, while overemphasis on such proposals dissuade attention from the kinds of settings that are liable for much of…

Pages: 7  |  Term Paper  |  Style: n/a  |  Sources: 0


Stricter Gun Control Laws. The

The opposition however, is backed by the multibillion dollar enterprise of gun manufacturers who promote slogans such as: "Guns Don't Pull Their Own Triggers" and "Ted Kennedy's Car Has Killed More People Than My Gun." Statistically 13 children die each and every day in America from gun violence. In family members of gun owners have a 22 times higher incidence of being harmed by that gun then being harmed by a possible intruder's gun. For one to answer the question of the danger of guns in the hands of the general public one only has to look at the headlines (Cannon PG). On Oct. 1, 1997, a teenaged killer in Pearl, Miss., was captured by Assistant Principal Joel Myrick, who by chance had his.45-caliber pistol in his car. The following April, a 14-year-old in Edinboro, Pa., killed a science teacher and wounded several students at a school dance, but was held by James Strand, the owner of the hall, who subdued the youth at the point of a shotgun (Cannon PG)." These and many other cases are becoming common place on American soil. It is time to re-evaluate the laws about gun purchase, and ownership in this country. The constitution does talk about the right to bear arms but it was meant in the light of the nation arming itself against attack from other nations. Nowhere in the constitution does it mention individuals owning guns for the purpose of shooting others. Guns will never be completely eradicated, however the time has come to be tougher on who can purchase them and what they must do as owners (Senate PG). Trigger lock programs, gun safety education and extremely strict background checks are all things that need to be implemented and enforced daily when it comes to firearms in America. The gun owners who end up with accidental shootings in their home or family should face long prison terms with no possibility of early release. If gun control laws get stricter and are enforced with more consistency gun owners will become more responsible in their "right to bear arms." In addition any crime that is committed with the use of a loaded gun should carry a mandatory life sentence. If these measures are strictly adhered to, the nation will see a decrease in gun violence. Works Cited MORE BACK GUN CONTROL SINCE MASSACRE, POLL FINDS.(News)(Statistical Data Included) National Journal GUN CONTROL: The…

Pages: 3  |  Term Paper  |  Style: n/a  |  Sources: 0


Smith & Wesson Safety Reform

This agreement stripped Smith & Wesson from the list of defendants in 15 of the 30 lawsuits filed by several cities and the states of New York and Connecticut. Reactions by the Primary Stakeholders Smith & Wesson's signing of the agreement was viewed as a capitulation by the other gun manufacturers, who almost uniformly vowed to continue the fight against stricter gun control laws (Dao, 2000). The president of the National Shooting Sports Foundation, the largest gun maker trade association, predicted that Smith & Wesson would be the lone deserter. In contrast, the National Rifle Association, the largest organization representing gun owners in America, chose not to comment on the day the agreement was announced. While gun makers, gun owners, and their lobbying organizations have vowed to boycott Smith & Wesson handguns, AG Spitzer countered this proposal by suggesting that states and large cities purchase firearms only from manufacturers who conform to the policy goals contained within the agreement (Dao, 2000). This is not an empty threat, since law enforcement personnel and agencies are responsible for 25% of all handgun purchases in the U.S. A bit surprisingly, some gun control advocates were not overly thrilled with the agreement (Dao, 2000). Kristen Rand of the Violence Policy Center suggested that enforcing the background check provision of the agreement is next to impossible. Rand also mentioned a loophole that would permit Smith & Wesson to avoid incorporating technology preventing use by anyone other than the owner, by marketing a firearm as a collector's item. A Temple University law professor, David Kairys, would have felt better about the agreement if Smith & Wesson had been forced to turn over records believed to hold insights into disreputable marketing strategies. Conclusions Rarely does a gun manufacturer capitulate when pressured by advocates of gun control. The agreement signed between Smith & Wesson and the state of New York represented a truly remarkable event in the long history of conflict between gun owners, gun makers, and gun control advocates. While there may be problems with oversight and implementation of the agreement, the recognition by Smith & Wesson of the need to change gun designs and distribution policies represented a significant victory for advocates of gun control and victims of gun violence. The conflict between Smith & Wesson and the state of New York was thus resolved successfully, pending successful implementation of the agreement. References Dao, James. (2000,…

Pages: 3  |  Essay  |  Style: n/a  |  Sources: 1


Gun Control in the American

Kip was reported to have received from his father, Bill, a 9 mm Glock semi-automatic pistol, one of the guns he had in possession when he went on his 'killing spree' in Thurston High. Clearly, Kip's father's toleration of his son owning a weapon contributed to his easy manipulation and accomplishment of a violent and deadly act (that is, killing innocent people, including his own parents). Also, mass media and the businesses who benefit from manufacturing and producing weapons, specifically guns, are also responsible for the proliferation of young Americans having easy access to weapons. Because mass media promotes violence and desensitizes the youth by advocating violence on TV, and businesses staunch supporters of the "youth gun culture," strict gun control sanctions and the dangers of gun use are not, or even ignored, by the youth. Lastly, the legal system of the country regarding gun control is ineffective in implementing strict control of gun possession among individuals under the legal age of 18. An article by the Violence Policy Center (VPC) cited that the U.S. federal law does inhibit gun acquisition/purchase for individuals under the age of 18, but gun possession restrictions aren't the same in all states in the country. As was stated in the report, "possession of handguns and rifles by juveniles is regulated solely at the state level. In many states it is legal for juveniles to possess shotguns and rifles, although other states regulate or prohibit possession of long guns." Thus, through this statement, it is evident that the law regarding gun ownership, acquisition, possession is inadequate to fully implement a strict and legal gun control measures to prevent another episode of youth violence from happening again in the American society. In effect, the society and its institutions play a vital role in preventing or further accelerating the rapid increase of youth violence and inadequate gun control rules and measures in the country. Works Cited Navasky, Miri. "The Killer at Thurston High." PBS Online and FRONTLINE. 13 November 2002 http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/pages/frontline/shows.kinkel/. Recruitment of Kids to the Gun Culture." Violence Policy Center Web site. 13 November 2002 http://www.vpc.org/studies/startcon.htm.…

Pages: 2  |  Term Paper  |  Style: n/a  |  Sources: 0


Second Amendment Should Be Sacrosanct

In Los Angeles however, a child who spending a year in jail for robbery stated that a handgun could be bought of the street for forty dollars. In about five years, since the enactment of the Brady Bill and Assault Weapons Ban in 1993, there have been nine "school massacres." To demonstrate that federal regulations are not enforced, even after the Brady Bill and regulations that keep schools gun free zones, 6,000 children were caught with guns at school in 1997 and 1998. Out of these, 13 were federally prosecuted. In 1997, in Pearl, Mississippi school massacre, sixteen-year-old Luke Woodham stabbed his mother to death and then proceeded to school where he shot nine students, killing two of them. An assistant principal, using a gun, stopped Woodham. The assistant principal kept the gun locked in his car outside the school zone and ran to his car to obtain the gun. The assistant principal controlled Woodham for four and a half minutes before the police arrived. (Skyran, 2003) In 1988, The NRA developed a gun safety program for schoolchildren As of 1998, the program has reached about 10 million children. The goal of the program is to teach children what to do if they should encounter a firearm. The NRA advocates (during gun training) that the gun should be pointed in a safe direction whether loaded or unloaded. The finger should always be pointed off the trigger until ready to shoot. The guns should be unloaded unless the person was ready to shoot. The Declaration of Independence and the U.S. Constitutions are documents that should be held sacred by all Americans. Indeed the contents of these documents have been held as beacons of freedom for countries all over the world. Much like arguments about the Bible, these documents have stood the test of time. Except for a few amendments, the wisdom of the founding fathers has had far-reaching consequences. This includes the right to bear arms. This right should be preserved. Or at least it should be debated in a non-biased manner where special interests and panderers are not allowed the only say in the matter. Thomas Jefferson quoted: "Laws that forbid the carrying of arms... disarm only those who are neither inclined nor determined to commit crimes....Such laws make things worse for the assaulted and better for the assailants; they serve rather to encourage than to prevent homicides, for an…

Pages: 5  |  Term Paper  |  Style: n/a  |  Sources: 0

 1 2 3 . . . Last ›

 

Disclaimer