North Carolina and Seat Belt Safety … Case Study
Pages: 10 (3145 words) | Style: n/a | Sources: 0
Boosting Seat Belt Awareness and Usage in North Carolina: A Public Health Campaign Case Study
The case study by Williams, Wells, and Reinfurt (2002) entitled Increasing Seat Belt Use in North Carolina examines a number of strategies that North Carolina could implement in order to increase the number of drivers who use safety belts when driving. The study identifies Canada as a nation that had a similar problem of low rate of drivers wearing seat belts until the country implemented a three-fold strategy of public education about "the importance of wearing seat belts," tighter law enforcement in terms of fining drivers/passengers for not wearing the seat belt, and increased publicity regarding the intention of law enforcement to begin cracking down on motorists not wearing seat belts (p. 85). This strategy allowed Canada to increase its numbers of drivers who wear seat belts dramatically.
According to the study, North Carolina was in place to be able to employ all three of these actions. It was a "primary" belt use law, meaning that law enforcement could stop a motorist for the sole reason that the motorist was not wearing a seat belt (most other states could only issue citations if the motorist had committed another offense first) (p. 86). Indeed, this is what North Carolina did: for two weeks in 1993, Governor Hunt appeared on TV to state that seat belt wearing was very important, that police would enforce the law now, and throughout the rest of the year, ads appeared in newspapers, on radio and TV educating the populace about the issue. Checkpoints were instituted and the following year more publicity was given to the campaign with nearly 1000 TV spots and nearly 1500 radio spots (Williams, Wells, Reinfurt, 2002, p. 87).
With over half a million dollars spent on the 1993 and 1994 campaigns (on publicity and enforcement), the results of the effectiveness of the campaign were looked forward to. Police reported that the number of citations given during the "Click it or Ticket" campaign increased substantially, and overall seat belt usage increased significantly to upwards of 80% by the summer of 1994 (Williams, Wells, Reinfurt, 2002, p. 89), up from the 60-65%ile range it had been in during the early 1990s (Williams Wells, Reinfurt, 2002, p. 86).
In terms of the impact on the overall safety of motorists, there was a 9% decline in fatalities with nearly 50 fewer than predicted over the same course of time and a 7% decrease in injuries, with nearly 400 fewer than predicted (Williams, Wells, Reinfurt, 2002, p. 92).
A public survey showed that respondents appreciated and favored the "Click It or Ticket" program because they felt it was making the roadways safer and nearly half of the respondents asserted that the campaign helped them to start wearing their seat belts when driving.
Thus, this case study concluded that by implementing the methods utilized by Canada regarding promoting seat belt usage among motorists, North Carolina was able to increase the number of its drivers who wear seat belts and it was able to do so while maintaining public support for the initiative. This was, in effect, a result of the increase in attention given to raising public awareness about the importance of wearing seat belts and the efforts of law enforcement to enforce the law. In order to keep increasing the number of users wearing seat belts, North Carolina should, according to the researchers, implement a strategy to continue awareness and consider alternative forms of punishment (such as instead of higher ticket fines using driver's license points as a way to encourage adherence to the law).
The specific criteria used to assess this case will be the co-orientation model and the theories of behavior prediction and the situational theory of publics. The study is also assessed in terms of the effectiveness of its qualitative and quantitative analysis, its methodology, and its limitations.
The case study employed both qualitative and quantitative data gathering and analysis, making it a mixed-methods study and well-rounded in terms of gathering subjective and objective evidence to better understand the impact of the public health campaign centering on seat belt usage in North Carolina. The qualitative methods used were interviews and surveys conducted with the populace in North Carolina, and the responses were gathered and used to provide a sense of what the average person in North Carolina thought of the "Click It or Ticket" campaign. The quantitative methods involved in this case study included using predictive models, surveillance, and measurements of money spent and ads run. Correlation between the campaign efforts and the results was then assessed using simple percentile assessment statistics and comparing estimates with actual numbers. Each method supplied a different aspect of knowledge regarding the effectiveness of the campaign and was thus useful in gauging the overall impact in terms of actual, concrete data and in terms of public opinion and what the average person thought (Baxter, Jack, 2008; Creswell, 2007; Powell, 2006).
The theory of public relations that the study used was based on the co-orientation model: it addressed the various aspects of a public relations campaign coupled with a campaign to improve public health and awareness regarding the safety of wearing seat belts. For this reason, the study examined what it was that the state of North Carolina wished to do -- its goals and objectives relating to the problem of motor safety. It used evidence from a Canadian campaign as a means of implementing a strategy to address the issue.
The issue was then taken to the public and stated in terms of public safety: the public was educate via popular media -- radio, television spots and newspaper ads raising awareness about the importance of using seat belts when driving. The study did not include any discussion of what type of ads were used but did describe the campaign as being part of the "Click It or Ticket" campaign, a popular nationwide effort to increase the number of drivers wearing seatbelts. A depiction of the ads might have added to the qualitative design of the methodology, giving further evidence of the type of ads used and whether certain ads were more effective than others based on survey responses. This could help to guide future campaigns or to regenerate interest in the issue over a period of time by returning to the same quality of ad or theme/approach used by the spot to help draw the audience into the message.
The quantitative statistics were also based on and measured against estimates for the same time period and this does not provide conclusive evidence of change for the better. A better quantitative assessment would be a measurement over a period of months and years following the campaign to decide whether or not the issue has been addressed adequately in the efficacious sense. At the same time, a study about how effective campaigns are in totally generating new social behaviors or initiating behaviors that the state would like to see its citizens adopt could have been discussed in a literature review section. This case study did not provide any such literature review and it might have been helpful in establishing better context for expectations. Overall, the study provided a slim window into the efficaciousness of the public health campaign and only gave a small window in terms of analysis. The study may have benefited from a more qualitative-focused assessment of the actual campaign itself and the ad strategies used to sway the populace towards adopting the measure in conjunction with the crackdown of law enforcement. In order to really gauge how beneficial these parts of the campaign are when applied together, a control study might be implemented in which only one part is utilized and the other not at all. Thus, a campaign in which only public awareness strategy is implemented, while law enforcement is not, or a campaign where law enforcement is utilized by public awareness is not, could provide evidence of why it is important that the parts be implemented as a whole. This could take the form of a qualitative study or even a phenomenological study (Merriam, 2002; Lin, 2013).
The study did acknowledge the public's response in keeping with the co-orientation model and noted that there was agreement between what the state sought to accomplish and what the public thought about it the endeavor. Thus, positive correlation was shown in terms of the state and public being aligned with the same vision and goal. Likewise, the public saw the state's objective as being one that was good and while the public did not wear seat belts overwhelmingly before the campaign, thanks to the public education the importance and value of wearing a seatbelt was brought home to citizens and the law enforcement drive was used as a push to reinforce the concept that this idea of safe driving was important enough that the state was going to fine people who did not conform. The perceived agreement, therefore, between the public and… [END OF PREVIEW]
Cite This Paper:
APA FormatNorth Carolina And Seat Belt Safety. (2016, April 19). Retrieved March 28, 2017, from http://www.essaytown.com/subjects/paper/north-carolina-seat-belt-safety/2074581
MLA Format"North Carolina And Seat Belt Safety." 19 April 2016. Web. 28 March 2017. <http://www.essaytown.com/subjects/paper/north-carolina-seat-belt-safety/2074581>.
Chicago Format"North Carolina And Seat Belt Safety." Essaytown.com. April 19, 2016. Accessed March 28, 2017.