Essay - Danny's Decision 1) the Central Ethical Issue is Whether or...


1 2 3 4 5 6
Copyright Notice

Danny's Decision

1) The central ethical issue is whether or not Danny should leak the inf*****mation to Cross about the fraudulent contracts. Danny would need to break ***** law in order to give Cross the *****formation, but the information pertains to o*****rs in government breaking the law. Danny has a responsibility to ***** Americ*****n people in his role to uncover such *****formation, but he also has a responsibility to the American people to protect ***** national security interest.

2) One of the key issues is whe*****r or not Danny ***** other channels available to him to blow the whistle on the fraudulent *****. He may in fact have legal means to resolve the issue, rather that resort*****g to illegal ***** through contact with *****. Indeed, Danny appears to be covered by the Whistleblower Protection Act, meaning ***** he can disclose t***** fraud ***** others within government and receive protection against action from his superi***** (Whitaker, 2007). Thus, ***** may have other alternatives that lessen the ***** quandary involved.

3) Danny can go to Cross, keep the information to himself or ***** through other government ***** as an internal whistleblower. We can deduce that those within his department will be negatively affected by the first and third options. ***** will suffer consequences with the first option because the activity is illegal. The second option will result in fewer negative consequences f***** Danny but he will have failed the American people ***** his duty. The ***** option ***** allow him ***** meet his ***** and mitigate negative consequences to himself. The other key stakeholder is ***** security. The ***** contracts are more potentially damaging than the leak of them, so the second option is most *****. ***** public as a stakeholder ***** be ***** harmed by the ***** and second options, the first because ***** controversy would undermine ***** confidence in ***** and the ***** because ***** taxpayers would be subject to ongoing fraud.

4) Under rule utilitarian*****m, Danny should consider the ***** of his action if he were to follow ***** rules all ***** t***** *****ime (Mautner, no date). He is guided by the boundaries of h***** job, w*****ich obliges him ***** consider both his duty to the ***** people and ***** national security. The expected consequences, in general, are the protection of ***** security ***** the occasional fraud or abuse being allowed. Under t***** rule, Danny would need to trust that, on average, ***** results are going to be positive. With whistleblower protection in place, however, ***** can now protect both national security and the taxpayer's interest, though Danny cannot assume the system will work as intended, given recent c*****es of government ***** of state secrets privilege to protest itself (Edmond, 2007).

Under deon*****logy, however, choices are morally required, forbidden or permitted. For Danny, the dilemma is that the two ***** he has identified are both forbidden ***** law. The third option - to be an ***** ***** - is permitted. Indeed, it is morally required, ***** it ***** part

. . . . [END OF THESIS PAPER PREVIEW]

Download complete paper (and others like it)    |    Order a one-of-a-kind, custom paper

© 2001–2018   |   Thesis Papers about Danny's Decision 1) the Central Ethical Issue is Whether or   |   Research Paper Models