Administration & Evaluation of Adult Term Paper

Pages: 10 (3533 words)  ·  Bibliography Sources: 1+  ·  Level: College Senior  ·  Topic: Teaching  ·  Buy This Paper

SAMPLE EXCERPT:

[. . .] (Elliott & Hayward, 1994, p. 33)

The various activities financed under Adult Education National Programs can be assembled into five classes: result assessment of Federal programs; appraisals that recognize effectual activities and programs; explanatory case-studies, descriptive reviews, secondary data analyses; developmental projects to make issue-based points, policy analysis, guides, research agendas, and other supportive papers, technical assistance and training to States and local contributors to enhance assessment potential and for improvement of program. A large assortment of evaluation projects has been financed through the scheme of Adult Education National Programs from the start of FY 1998. These programs have been managed by the Planning and Evaluation Service, Office of the Under Secretary, Office of Vocational and Adult Education or the Office of Educational Research and Improvement. (Garrison, 1992, p.138)

The projects financed have extended from small commissioned papers to a large-scale countrywide representative reviews and an arbitrary task research of a welfare reform programs for particularly aimed populations and growth of models of efficient programs. The U.S. Department of Education is going on organizing adult education studies in more or less two large categories - Evaluating the consequence of Federal programs and Enhancing local performance in adult education. Under the first category i.e. assessing the impact of Federal programs is a long-term, main concern for Adult Education National Programs. Research work done or nearly completed have reviewed the fundamental State grant program for adult education as also a number of smaller optional programs like the Section 353 State reserved for training and research. The second group which is bettering local practice is a different long-term priority or adult education. Standards of student attainment are a vital element of an Adult Basic Education (ABE) enhancement system. Evaluations that are associated with these standards are also necessary to better program class. (Merriam; Brockett, 1996, 72)

Quantifying student's learning and performance against standards and intending to improve the efficacy of ABE programs, standing on these procedures, are chief objectives of the U.S. Department of Education's center of Adult Education and Literacy. Standards that imply what students must have knowledge about and capable of performing in core subject areas lay down the hope for student learning and direct programs and instructors in building an unambiguous series of directives, resulting in secondary completion and transcending to the subsequent stages of education and employment. During the period when content standards generate an intended succession of learning effects and targeted training, performance estimates by standardized assessment gives more momentous information for policy-making and program development. A few excellent-quality appraisals in the realm of adult education, evaluates the efficacy of local practice. (Daloz, 1999, p.116)

The U.S. Department has lately begun significant evaluations of Adult Basic Education and ESL programs to spot efficient performances in those spheres. The Department has even worked together with the National ESL Clearinghouse on Literacy Education (NCLE) to buildup products on efficient strategies for operating with adults on ESL and in extending technical support for propagating reports from the National Adult Literacy Survey. Apart from these long-term types for adult education national programs, the Department has ongoing concern in the classes of technology, professional development, welfare restructuring and State and local act and evaluation information. Amid the Department's relevant objectives that reply to precedence laid down by the President and Secretary or to particular adult education matters requiring interest are utilizing technology to enhance instruction and authority, exploring the importance of adult education in welfare improvement and improving State and local performance and appraisal data. (Elliott & Hayward, 1994, p. 47)

Employing technology to develop adult education imparting and management is steady with both the Secretary's extensive attention in favoring the application of educational technology and the mounting demand of adult educators for increased Federal control and favor for development and technical help. Technology can play a significant part in adult education, especially in sustaining the personalization of instructions for adults. Welfare development a chief priority for this management has significant inference for adult education. Because of the multiplicity of the student's objective and the deliberate character of individual contribution, a substantial freedom in instruction in majority of the adult education program exists. Rather than observing a prescribed curriculum format, programs generally use an array of instructional resources, inclusive of materials which are either procured from publishers or are enriched by the trainers themselves. (U.S. Department of Education, 1994, p.6)

In most of the occasions, these materials are not consistent across, or even within, places of a single program. One more hindrance to state endeavor to augment program responsibility and perform assessments is the condition learner evaluations by local adult education programs. Managing uniform appraisal devices is not a priority for majority of the programs; pretests are often given exclusively to participants whose literacy is assumed to be at an adequate level and very few programs have post test data, still for learners continuing in a program for a considerable number of hours. Moreover, standardized appraisal devices are often chosen for simplicity of governance rather than their ability to reflect the content of what is being imparted. Policy makers have recognized long-term welfare beneficiaries devoid of elementary skills as a vital impediment to self-sufficiency. (Garrison, 1992, p.139)

Continuing apprehensions about program efficiency, together with legislative suggestions under contemplation that might concentrate adult education into a service-related elementary skill program, are prompting states to rethink the individually-aimed characteristic of adult education program. Adult educators are required to perk up their programs lasting value for welfare customers and also partner with social services agencies in bringing about a synchronized, complete set of services that will encourage self-sufficiency and employment. Bettering State and local performance and evaluation data is a precedence that stands on quite a number of researches. Several states have taken up activities to devise an increased responsible adult education program by building unanimity on the content to be imparted, designing a core adult education syllabus which frequently stresses employment-connected elementary proficiencies, and recognizing assessment devises to gauge the quantum of learning by the participants. (Caffarella, 1994, p.87)

The U.S. Department of Education in 1994 concluded a national assessment of federally-supported adult education programs. The objective of the research was to find out the efficacy of the present programs in lowering discrepancies in literary competencies, English language adeptness, and secondary school pass-out. The assessment was conducted by Development Associates during 1990 and 1994 since the National Evaluation of Adult Education Programs (NEAEP) utilizing data from program year 1991 to 1992. The results of the study were printed in a series of four reports explaining the adult education service delivery pattern, the features of the adult education customers, the trend and predictors of program attendance, and calculation of program impacts and expenses. (Caffarella, 1994, p.135)

The Adult Education Act is supposed to assist adults by enriching their fundamental education proficiencies, improving their market value of their employment and fostering continued education. In self-reports asked for after six months program exit, ESL customers specified that taking part in adult education had helped most of them to develop their Basic English skills. Uniform achievement test outcomes which include an approximate gain of 5 scale score points on the Comprehensive Adult Student Assessment System (CASAS), reading examination following 120 hours of instructions even evidenced objectively that ESL instruction had assisted in picking up the reading skills of adults being taught English as a second language. At the time of entering the program, the English language skills of the majority of ESL learners were found adequate for just an entry-level employment, after completion of the program, their English literacy aptitude had improved to a level that was adequate for joining in any job training or for taking up a job that requires understanding simple English text information. (Pica, 1994, p.72)

The factors in the ESL program that was responsible directly to this enrichment in English literacy comprised cost per seat hour and the net hours of instructions given. Meaning, Basic English literacy skills bettered with increased bouts of ESL instruction and higher financial investment in ESL programs. The six-month follow-up outcomes also reveal that 35% of the ESL customers gained in certain manner from adult education as regards increased employability. 6% total gain in employment was attributed for joining ESL after the closure of the program. Apart from that, those who stayed employed from the intake stage through the six-month follow-up, ESL customers gained much from participating in the program than ABE or ASE clients as regards improving their performance in jobs and in securing a superior job than held before enrolling in adult education. Lastly, ESL consumers displayed interest in continuing their education. (Cervero; Wilson, 1996, p.28)

Nearly, a quarter of the ESL clients who didn't possess a high school diploma had recommenced their education in the space of six months of quitting adult education, a majority of them re-admitting themselves in the English language… [END OF PREVIEW]

Four Different Ordering Options:

?
Which Option Should I Choose?

1.  Buy the full, 10-page paper:  $24.68

or

2.  Buy & remove for 30 days:  $38.47

or

3.  Access all 175,000+ papers:  $41.97/mo

(Already a member?  Click to download the paper!)

or

4.  Let us write a NEW paper for you!

Ask Us to Write a New Paper
Most popular!

Adult Day Care Term Paper


Adult Education Programs and Activities in the United States Toward a Balanced History Thesis


Designing a Specific Educational Program Adult Literacy Thesis


Are Educational Evaluations in U.S. Schools Truly Reflective of the Ability of Culturally Diverse Students? Term Paper


Substance Abuse in Young Adults Essay


View 498 other related papers  >>

Cite This Term Paper:

APA Format

Administration & Evaluation of Adult.  (2004, June 11).  Retrieved February 17, 2019, from https://www.essaytown.com/subjects/paper/administration-evaluation-adult/4651871

MLA Format

"Administration & Evaluation of Adult."  11 June 2004.  Web.  17 February 2019. <https://www.essaytown.com/subjects/paper/administration-evaluation-adult/4651871>.

Chicago Format

"Administration & Evaluation of Adult."  Essaytown.com.  June 11, 2004.  Accessed February 17, 2019.
https://www.essaytown.com/subjects/paper/administration-evaluation-adult/4651871.