Administrative Law and Due Process Essay

Pages: 4 (1472 words)  ·  Bibliography Sources: 0  ·  File: .docx  ·  Level: Master's  ·  Topic: Business - Law


The revolution that has occurred with regard to interpretation of due process cases has become even more complex with the burgeoning outsourcing of government functions to private entities. The considerations are of both authority and responsibility since the source of any deprivation of constitutional rights must be determined, and as in American Manufacturers Mutual Insurance Company v. Sullivan (1999), issues such as extent and aggravation of harm resulting from the privatization must be considered.Download full Download Microsoft Word File
paper NOW!

TOPIC: Essay on Administrative Law & Due Process Assignment

b. Access to agency information is necessary to ensure that the appropriate implementation of policy. In Shapiro v. United States (1948), the Supreme Court upheld the policy that regulated agencies must retain and release upon request to government regulators those records necessary for policy enforcement and protection of the public. Noncompliance with governmental requests for agency records can result in the issuance of a subpoena -- a process which can be challenged before the fact. In the Federal Trade Commission v. American Tobacco (1924), the Court narrowed the reach of the subpoena by requiring it to have a substantial foundation. Twenty years later, in Oklahoma Press Publishing Co. v. Walling (1946), the Court determined that congressional intent for an agency to search for particular records must have been previously established. The Court has been of two minds with regard to physical inspection of agency premises with the intention to gather information or have access to records. When an agency is a pervasively regulated business, as with the firearm business in United States v. Biswell (1972) and the Catering Corporation v. United States (1970), the Court has found that no warrant is required as inspections and closer supervision have been the standard operating procedure. However, when applying civic codes, such as public health standards as in Camara v. Municipal Court (1967) and the municipal fire code as in See v. Seattle, regulation imposed on private establishments as part of a periodic review is not comparable to regulation that when applied to agencies results in ongoing inspection. The weight of the public interest in balance with the private interest has also been a factor in the Court's decision, as seen in Wyman v. James (1971) regarding AFDC visits to ascertain the need for benefits. In Marshall v. Barlow's Incorporated (1978), the Court established that probable cause of legislative entitlement to must be demonstrated for nonconsensual OSHA inspections. In Dow Chemical v. U.S. (1986), the Court broadened the ability of agencies to conduct physical inspections, by allowing the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) to use aerial photos as a form of warrantless inspection, asserting that the expectation of privacy in an open field was necessarily limited. The Court's efforts to balance individual privacy with protection of the public interest are evident in National Treasury Employees Union v. Van Raab (1989). The Court found that the substantial interests of the government with regard to stopping drug trafficking must cause employees to have a lesser expectation with regard to their privacy as it applies to the execution of their jobs.

In concert with the tasks of obtaining relevant information for purposes of agency regulation is the dissemination of information. A threat to competition is a consideration in the dissemination of information as illustrated by the Court's decision in National Parks and Conservation Association v. Morton (1974) that a monopoly cannot demonstrate competitive harm. The 5th exemption under the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) was employed in NLRB v. Sears Roebuck and Co. (1975), where Sears wanted documents that stating that no further action would be taken by National Labor Relations Board (NLRB). The documents categorically fell under Attorney-client privilege, but because a decision not to continue had already been made by the National Labor Relations Board, and release of the documents would not impact the decision-making process, the Court determined that the information should be released. In the U.S. Department of Justice v. Reporters Committee for Freedom of Press (1989), the Court determined that criminal records should not be released to the press since the Freedom of Information Act is geared toward agency action, and the press was interested in the information that pertained to the criminal and not information that had to do with agency action.

In each of these illustrative cases, the Court has deliberated so as to… [END OF PREVIEW] . . . READ MORE

Two Ordering Options:

Which Option Should I Choose?
1.  Download full paper (4 pages)Download Microsoft Word File

Download the perfectly formatted MS Word file!

- or -

2.  Write a NEW paper for me!✍🏻

We'll follow your exact instructions!
Chat with the writer 24/7.

Administrative Law Term Paper

Basic Due Process for Students Thesis

Corporate Civil Procedure and Constitutional Law Term Paper

Law and Business When Glenn Assessment

Business - Law Business Law Issues Term Paper

View 200+ other related papers  >>

How to Cite "Administrative Law and Due Process" Essay in a Bibliography:

APA Style

Administrative Law and Due Process.  (2012, March 7).  Retrieved July 27, 2021, from

MLA Format

"Administrative Law and Due Process."  7 March 2012.  Web.  27 July 2021. <>.

Chicago Style

"Administrative Law and Due Process."  March 7, 2012.  Accessed July 27, 2021.