Agile vs Traditional Project Management Comparative Essay

Pages: 4 (1269 words)  ·  Bibliography Sources: 5  ·  File: .docx  ·  Level: Master's  ·  Topic: Management  ·  Written: July 31, 2019

This would make project execution much simpler.

Managing Project Execution

Conventional/ traditional project execution puts emphasis on ensuring that the initial plan for the project is executed as is and that it is strictly monitored and any variations fixed. Variations from the initial plan are undesired unless they are approved through a formalized change management system. Monitoring is, therefore, very important in traditional project management. A traditional-style project manager would typically monitor progress, quality, effort, and cost. Most importantly, they would monitor the milestones and whether they are being met. Monitoring these many things would typically be time-consuming and very difficult especially in big projects (Fitsilis, 2008). For instance, in a dam construction project managed in the waterfall style, the project manager would have to work closely with engineers, environmental experts, government agencies, the affected individuals and communities, and other stakeholders to ensure the success of the project.

Oppositely, in agile project management, the project manager is more of a coordinator than anything else. He or she will only need to set up small teams to execute different parts of the project (Fitsilis, 2008). This makes it easier to manage such agile projects in theory. For example, a project leader/ manager in a software development project could assign teams of developers different tasks to complete at the same time toward the completion of the same software.Buy full Download Microsoft Word File paper
for $19.77

Quality and Risk Management

Comparative Essay on Agile vs Traditional Project Management Assignment

Quality and risk management are important in agile project management and they are shared among the teams and addressed at several levels of project execution. During daily meetings, the different teams could identify the challenges in their tasks, dependencies, and possible parts of their projects that could result in quality issues. The daily meetings help to map risks, dependencies, and quality issues early and to mitigate them before late (Gablas, Ruzicky & Ondrouchova, 2018). There are usually also retrospective quality assurance meetings to ensure that every task went well (Gablas et al., 2018). On the other hand, quality and risk management in traditional project management is more detailed and robust. The first step is mapping the risks and quality issues early in advance based on the Probability and Impact Matrix analysis. The second step is identifying the risks via SWOT analysis, Delphi, and brainstorming (Gablas et al., 2018; Harrison & Lock, 2017). The third step is the use of expert judgment, probability distribution, and other tools to analyze the risks. And the last step is to mitigate the risks.


The traditional and agile project management practices are quite different. Each has its own uses. The main differences are as follows: (a) the traditional method relies heavily on prior planning, while the agile approach is based on a rough roadmap that can be adjusted as the project goes on, (b) the traditional method is sequential while the agile one is agile and quite flexible, (c) the project risks and dependencies in the agile method are addressed in a less robust manner than in the traditional method. All in all, both project management approaches have their own pros and cons and can be useful for different types of projects.

  1. Fair, J. (2012). Agile versus Waterfall: Approach is right for my ERP project? Project Management Institute.
  2. Fitsilis, P. (2008). Comparing PMBOK and Agile Project Management software development processes. In Advances in Computer and Information Sciences and Engineering (pp. 378-383). Springer, Dordrecht.
  3. Gablas, B., Ruzicky, E., & Ondrouchova, M. (2018). The Change in Management Style during then Course of a Project from the Classical to the Agile Approach. Journal of Competitiveness, 10(4), 38-53.
  4. Harrison, F., & Lock, D. (2017). Advanced project management: a structured approach. Routledge.
  5. Rehman, I. U., Rauf, A., & Shahid, A. A. (2010, October). Scope management in agile versus traditional software development methods. In Proceedings of the 2010 National… [END OF PREVIEW] . . . READ MORE

Two Ordering Options:

Which Option Should I Choose?
1.  Buy full paper (4 pages)Download Microsoft Word File

Download the perfectly formatted MS Word file!

- or -

2.  Write a NEW paper for me!✍🏻

We'll follow your exact instructions!
Chat with the writer 24/7.

Project Management: How Scope, Time, and Cost Research Paper

Management at Sun Microsystems Term Paper

Management Principles Explain the Terms Organic Essay

Knowledge Management in Accenture Thesis

Organization Management Review of Deming and Goldrat Research Paper

View 200+ other related papers  >>

How to Cite "Agile vs Traditional Project Management" Comparative Essay in a Bibliography:

APA Style

Agile vs Traditional Project Management.  (2019, July 31).  Retrieved August 7, 2020, from

MLA Format

"Agile vs Traditional Project Management."  31 July 2019.  Web.  7 August 2020. <>.

Chicago Style

"Agile vs Traditional Project Management."  July 31, 2019.  Accessed August 7, 2020.