Alarm Clock Will Break Term Paper

Pages: 5 (1483 words)  ·  Bibliography Sources: 0  ·  File: .docx  ·  Level: College Senior  ·  Topic: Literature

However, it is important to remember how difficult it is to collect evidence in a careful and systematic way: We all certainly remember what happened at the O.J. Simpson trial, another high-stakes trial and one in which the police had far better forensic tools at their disposal.

Another one of the important strengths of this book is that Weisberg does not speculate about who the killer or killers of Kennedy might have been: He does not find evidence that points to any particular person, people, or group and he very wisely forebears from stretching the evidence that he does find to wring a name out of thing air. Had he done so, he would certainly have undermined much of the rest of the argument in his book, for its value is as a piece of investigative scholarship based on those facts that the Warren Commission reported.

To stray from these facts would have taken Weisberg beyond the rational, if complex and often speculative, realm of the conspiracy theorist over the line into the paranoid. We are relieved that the final chapter does not point the finger at the Mafia - or Elvis impersonators or Martians or Cubans.

Download full Download Microsoft Word File
paper NOW!
And yet, even as the fact that Weisberg does not name any names that he does not have good evidence to accuse, the fact that he does not come up with an alternative does raise important questions. (It should perhaps be noted at this point that Weisberg also investigated the assassination of Martin Luther King, Jr., and came up with no alternative solution.) One does wonder at the end of reading his exhaustive study that if even he could find no evidence of who else might be involved than perhaps it is because that evidence is not there.

Term Paper on Alarm Clock Will Break and Assignment

It was certainly the ethically right thing for him to do not to accuse someone when he did not have sufficient evidence, but the lack of names does undermine his argument. One has the feeling that perhaps any police investigation, if examined as closely as this one was, might looked similarly flawed. (This is not, of course, a good thing, and should make us concerned about the ways in which justice is and is not served in this country, but we must always remember that incompetence and conspiracy are not the same thing.)

Among the points that Weisberg makes are a number showing that the Warren Report does not include all of the information that the commission had access to. These include a number of small details that may or may not add up to conspiracy. For example, a photograph taken by AP photographer James Altgens shows that the Secret Service agents guarding Johnson were already moving to protect Johnson while those guarding Kennedy were still standing on the car's running boards, even though Kennedy was obviously hurt.

In the Warren Report, that photograph is reproduced, Weisberg notes (pp. 202-3), but the section of the photograph showing Johnson's agents has been cut out as if to hide the fact that they were reacting - and so therefore should have Kennedy's agents been reacting. This does seem suggestive - but it also seems possible that Kennedy's agents were simply frozen by shock because they were so close to what was happening: It is often easier to react if one if farther away.

Such details do make one question the finding of the commission, but, as noted at the beginning of this paper, they are unlikely to convince one that there was a conspiracy unless one is already inclined to believe that there was one. One of the major reasons for this is that Weisberg never suggests why it is that there should be a conspiracy to assassinate Kennedy. Certainly any president has enemies, but in the absence of any idea of who might have killed Kennedy, it is hard to believe in these enemies.

Those who use assassination as a form of political censorship - and certainly they exist - usually claim credit for what they have done, otherwise their point is substantially vitiated. The fact that no one - but the conspiracy theorists - stepped forward after the assassination has to make one wonder whether they were really… [END OF PREVIEW] . . . READ MORE

Two Ordering Options:

Which Option Should I Choose?
1.  Download full paper (5 pages)Download Microsoft Word File

Download the perfectly formatted MS Word file!

- or -

2.  Write a NEW paper for me!✍🏻

We'll follow your exact instructions!
Chat with the writer 24/7.

New Trucking Hours of Service Rule Research Paper

Best Man Speech Term Paper

Lasik Surgery Imagine Being Able to See Essay

Crime Scene Project Research Paper

Business Plan for Sleep Lab Business Plan

View 200+ other related papers  >>

How to Cite "Alarm Clock Will Break" Term Paper in a Bibliography:

APA Style

Alarm Clock Will Break.  (2002, November 5).  Retrieved June 14, 2021, from

MLA Format

"Alarm Clock Will Break."  5 November 2002.  Web.  14 June 2021. <>.

Chicago Style

"Alarm Clock Will Break."  November 5, 2002.  Accessed June 14, 2021.