Comparison: Counseling vs. Life Coaching Research Proposal

Pages: 31 (9312 words)  ·  Bibliography Sources: 25  ·  File: .docx  ·  Level: Doctorate  ·  Topic: Education

SAMPLE EXCERPT . . .
This could be in form of getting new jobs or switching career paths. Continuous learning and personal renewal could be essential in adjusting to the changes, and each person is responsible for devising their curriculum. These challenges face individuals, teams, and organizations.

This is where the life coach comes in. The coach is a teacher, and whether it is an individual, a client or a company, the relationship is usually deeper than that. Their function is to relate particular goals to the whole plan created in close consideration with the client's core values. The coach helps the client see more options and resources that might be at their disposal, while guiding them through a learning process of managing change rather than fearing it.

He adds that, during the 80s, many organizations adopted the prevailing philosophies of management that encouraged eliminating the middle managers so that the employees could get more freedom to manage their own results with minimal mentoring. However, trends started changing again and organizations now emphasize on working teams. This necessitated the need for a coach especially when the team hit an obstacle. To be a coach for an organization, there are specific skills of leadership, reliability and maturity, are essential. These skills are required to train teams effectively and guide organizations through transitions. A coach in an organization will deal a lot with collaboration, long-term planning and organizing. The coach will be expected to follow and nurture the organization's culture.

Buy full Download Microsoft Word File paper
for $19.77

Research Proposal on Comparison: Counseling vs. Life Coaching Assignment

Caspi (2005) similarly focuses on the growing popularity of life coaching and the issues and challenges that come with it. He argues that it is important to identify the two undertakings involved in coaching which are a method and a movement. The second usage, a movement, is the description that tends to cast coaching as a practice with its unique scope that is already on a path to becoming a profession or a discipline. This is being accelerated by the presence of a gradually growing body of research and organizations offering training and credentials to individuals who want to practice life coaching. This is making it increasingly easy for individuals to get the necessary knowledge and start offering life coaching services than it was before.

Caspi (2005) adds that coaching is a goal-oriented approach, unlike most traditional psychological treatments that focus on alleviating the problems at hand. Nonetheless, both methods focus on changing behaviors, feelings and attitudes of patients for the betterment of their lives. This difficulty to distinguish the two practices, especially among the patients is what is of concern to the profession since the two don't technically offer the same service. This can result in individuals offering services they are not qualified to offer or using coaching to circumvent licensure.

Caspi (2005) insists that social workers are well qualified to do coaching and there is no need for individuals with little or no qualification providing essential psychological services. Coaching previously emphasized on helping employees in a corporation to improve productivity. However, the growing popularity of life coaching has extended its business application to personal and life domains of psychology. The methods and approaches used by life coaches in the business domain are being applied in personal and life psychology; methods which in most cases are not applicable in those situations. Most life coaches are knowingly or unknowingly taking over the roles that are otherwise meant for social workers and offering services that they may not be qualified to provide. The paper emphasizes the need for dialogue on the growing popularity of life coaching in terms of its licensing, ethics and how to distinguish social workers from life coaches.

It is a widely acknowledged fact that the life coaching approach is a behavioral modification and inspirational technique which facilitates establishment and attainment of better goals, thereby improving individuals' functioning and wellbeing (Grant & O'Hara, 2006; Newnham-Kanas et al., 2010). This "innovative" field has distinguished itself from the conventional therapeutic sphere -- life coaches do not adopt an expert's role; rather, they serve as "thought partners" (Newnham-Kanas, Irwin and Morrow, D. 2011). Furthermore, they do not offer advice, but believe their clients can independently generate effective solutions for themselves (ICF, 2015). These professionals do not feel clients need "fixing." Their emphasis is on results for the future and not on problems of the past (ICF, 2015). According to practitioners, the life coaching technique is strong and effective; this argument has been corroborated by a growing pool of scientific proofs (Maples, 1996).

Counseling, psychology and other conventional helping professions are closely regulated and standardized (Williams & Davis, 2007). But the life coaching field does not have to follow any strict regulations or training conditions, and this is considered a major future problem for the sector (ICF, 2012). A second challenge is the confusion clients experience with regard to the advantages of coaching and how it differs from consulting, mentoring and other practices (ICF, 2012). How life coaching is defined has been another well-debated topic (Williams & Davis, 2007). There are numerous perspectives, each of which offers diverse coaching contexts. For instance, Grant (2003, p.254) gives a broad definition for the term, claiming that life coaching represents a methodical, solution-focused, cooperative and result-oriented process wherein a coach helps enhance non-clinical, normal clients' life experiences and facilitate their professional and personal goal achievement.

There are numerous empirical research works that support the life coaching profession's validity (Newnham-Kanas, Gorczynski, Irwin and Morrow, 2009; Newnham-Kanas et al., 2011). But methodological rigor is absent in most of these research works. Several empirical analyses do not include any operational description of the method of coaching employed, rendering it hard to figure out exactly what the authors are referring to when they use the word "coaching" (Newnham-Kanas et al., 2009). There are various descriptions and definitions of the term "life… [END OF PREVIEW] . . . READ MORE

Two Ordering Options:

?
Which Option Should I Choose?
1.  Buy full paper (31 pages)Download Microsoft Word File

Download the perfectly formatted MS Word file!

- or -

2.  Write a NEW paper for me!✍🏻

We'll follow your exact instructions!
Chat with the writer 24/7.

Life Coaching Listening Skills Research Paper


What Makes a Good Counselor? Thesis


Behavior and Cognitive Behavior Therapy and Developing My Personal Style Term Paper


Populations Span From the Egregiously Poor-Functioning Substance Research Paper


Performance Appraisal Methods the 360 Degree Feedback Case Study


View 200+ other related papers  >>

How to Cite "Comparison: Counseling vs. Life Coaching" Research Proposal in a Bibliography:

APA Style

Comparison: Counseling vs. Life Coaching.  (2016, August 16).  Retrieved July 6, 2020, from https://www.essaytown.com/subjects/paper/analyzing-life-coaching/9789134

MLA Format

"Comparison: Counseling vs. Life Coaching."  16 August 2016.  Web.  6 July 2020. <https://www.essaytown.com/subjects/paper/analyzing-life-coaching/9789134>.

Chicago Style

"Comparison: Counseling vs. Life Coaching."  Essaytown.com.  August 16, 2016.  Accessed July 6, 2020.
https://www.essaytown.com/subjects/paper/analyzing-life-coaching/9789134.