Research Paper: Audit of Organizational Effectiveness Department

Pages: 11 (3539 words)  ·  Bibliography Sources: 8  ·  Level: Doctorate  ·  Topic: Healthcare  ·  Buy This Paper


[. . .] The availability of informational resources also ensures that technology can facilitate fulfilling this mission and has created the need for new subdivisions within the organization to specifically avail the CDC of technology to communicate to the public as well as keeping metrics about the spread of the disease itself (Seasonal influenza, 2013, CDC).

However, there has been criticism of some HHS agencies for insufficient group development to address health needs. The FDA, for example, has been subject to a slew of criticisms regarding its lagging behind on approving new drugs for life-threatening diseases as well as its inability to effectively monitor food and drug safety, and to track the dissemination of contaminated foods. "FDA needs to, among other things, improve the data it uses to manage the foreign drug inspection program, conduct more inspections of foreign establishments, systematically prioritize and track promotional materials for review, and adopt management tools to ensure that drug sponsors comply with regulations on the presentation of clinical trial results" (FDA facing increasing criticism and calls for reform, 2009, AACR). Food recalls, the approval of drugs with controversial side effects and the approval of genetically-modified salmon have brought forth allegations that the FDA is insufficiently concerned with consumer health and is overly subject to industry pressures. In the latter instance, "genetically engineered to grow twice as fast as their unaltered brethren, the fish pose no significant environmental threat to the United States when grown in landlocked tanks, says the FDA" but environmentalists worry about the overall implications for the environment (Ledford 2013).

Team building

Fostering dialogue between different departments of the HHS is also vital. Many of the stated missions of the agency cannot be limited to a single component and require the facilitation of dialogue between work teams. For example, the missions of the CDC and NIH frequently overlap regarding research into the treatment of communicable diseases: both demand rigorous, peer-reviewed literature to provide guidance to individuals and state and local public health agencies with how to deal with infections. HHS was able to coordinate with state and private when the new flu strain H1N1 threatened a pandemic. HHS was able to work with scientists to rapidly develop a vaccine almost immediately and work with healthcare organizations to provide advice about safe ways to deal with the outbreak and to disseminate the vaccine in the most effective fashion possible (Voices of power: HHS Secretary Kathleen Sebelius, 2009, The Washington Post).

Collaboration and coordination with outside contractors

Although HHS is a federal agency, a large proportion of the activities of the organization are actually allotted to the states. HHS may provide guidance and advice regarding the administration of programs, but must work closely with states to ensure that federal aid is spent effectively. For example, to lower costs and better align the Medicaid (the federal healthcare program for the poor) and Medicare objectives when dealing with the elderly, the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) created an Alignment Initiative to provide faster state access to Medicare data to support care coordination" for Medicare patients (Ledford 2013).


It has also been alleged that insufficiently clear definitions of the scope of the FDA has impeded making effective decisions and inhibited the creation of effective policies in a number of areas, most notably food. For example, while the FDA is in charge of food safety in certain areas, the USDA is in charge of others such as meat safety, which can cause a conflict when there is a question of authority. "Food safety oversight is largely, but not exclusively, divided between two agencies, the FDA and the USDA. The USDA mostly oversees meat and poultry; the FDA mostly handles everything else, including pet food and animal feed. Although this division of responsibility means that the FDA is responsible for 80% of the food supply, it only gets 20% of the federal budget for this purpose. In contrast, the USDA gets 80% of the budget for 20% of the foods. This uneven distribution is the result of a little history and a lot of politics" (Nestle 2008: 145).

This also means that the ability to reach and implement effective decisions of the FDA and other branches of government in charge of policy related to human health is frequently compromised: while the FDA, to support human health, may wish to issue a guideline to eat fewer refined grains, because the USDA represents the interests of farmers, it will oppose such a measure, given it will eat into (no pun intended) farmer's profits. Even encouraging people to eat less can impact the economy and thus be opposed by corporate and financial interests; encouraging schools to have gym class that cuts into academic class time may threaten the goals of the U.S. Department of Education. Thus, given the broad outreach of healthcare policy and permeation into every facet of human life, no matter how motivated to enact changes, actual specific decision-making to create more effective policies may be stymied by politics.

Communication processes

Communication within the HHS is considered to be serious enough to be addressed by the NIH in one of its own publications. It notes that when communicating with other agencies "oversight representatives would like to be assured that the reviewers of research programs are objective, experienced, and expert -- again, a communication issue. Oversight bodies have expressed an inability to see or understand how those qualities are validated by agencies, and they have asked for improved communication about the procedures" (Implementing the government performance and results Act for research: A status report, 2001, National Academy of Sciences). Concerns about objectivity have been expressed regarding FDA tests of drugs and other substances -- for example, the FDA recently declared the chemical often found in plastics called bisphenol A, or BPA, to be safe, and the quality of the research caused both Republicans and Democrats alike to question this finding. "The FDA hired a private consulting group with strong industry ties to perform some of its analyses of BPA," in contrast to a peer-authored journal article in the Journal of the American Medical Association which "linked BPA to heart disease and diabetes in adults" (Szbao 2008).

Regardless of one's personal feelings about the issue, this indicates the degree to which the FDA has failed to convince the public about its ability to prioritize the value of human health. Recalls of foods which took place long after many people had been sickened, questions about the objectivity of peer-reviewed drug trials, and even the widespread concern and misinformation about the Affordable Care Act all indicate a need for more effective inspections and pressure upon corporate entities as well as better communication with the public on the part of HHS about such critical issues. Agencies must attempt to communicate important information to the public, such as the importance of the seasonal flu shot by the CDC and product recalls on the part of the FDA.

Power and politics

HHS has strongly supported recent legislation designed to improve human health as well as an expansion of current funding for health initiatives. Its current secretary has been highly praised for her advocacy of provisions of the Affordable Care Act. However, with many of its functions, HHS has limited authority because it must share power with the states. Medicaid, the healthcare program for those living beneath the poverty line, is a state-run program and provisions vary between states for participants' eligibility. The CDC is reliant upon states providing data regarding communicable diseases. Furthermore, because the HHS has traditionally represented marginalized persons -- those who are sick or poor -- this has tended to weaken its influence politically, versus federal agencies which have the interests of the wealthiest and most powerful segments of society at heart.

Organizational culture

The Organizational culture of certain components of the HHS has been criticized for being unduly sensitive to the influence of large corporations. "Hundreds of Food and Drug Administration (FDA)…employees who work with food safety said public health has been harmed by their agencies deferring to business interests… scientists and inspectors responsible for food safety have personally experienced political interference in their work, and that's bad for public health" (FDA and USDA scientists say U.S. food system needs strengthening, 2010, Union of Concerned Scientists).Many of the functions of HHS have the responsibility of being 'watchdog' organizations. But a lack of funding combined with the powerful nature of the interests who have a vested interest in less vigilance regarding safety has created an organizational culture which lacks objectivity and the ability to take a controversial stance. "More than 300 respondents (25%) [of FDA workers] said they personally experienced corporate interests forcing their agency to withdraw or significantly modify a policy or action designed to protect consumers… [END OF PREVIEW]

Four Different Ordering Options:

Which Option Should I Choose?

1.  Buy the full, 11-page paper:  $28.88


2.  Buy + remove from all search engines
(Google, Yahoo, Bing) for 30 days:  $38.88


3.  Access all 175,000+ papers:  $41.97/mo

(Already a member?  Click to download the paper!)


4.  Let us write a NEW paper for you!

Ask Us to Write a New Paper
Most popular!

Auditing in the Public Sector Term Paper

Audit Plan Outline Term Paper

Auditing Standards Standard: SAS No. 110 Term Paper

Auditing New Century Financial Corporation Essay

Auditing Standards in Australia Term Paper

View 529 other related papers  >>

Cite This Research Paper:

APA Format

Audit of Organizational Effectiveness Department.  (2013, August 31).  Retrieved July 18, 2019, from

MLA Format

"Audit of Organizational Effectiveness Department."  31 August 2013.  Web.  18 July 2019. <>.

Chicago Format

"Audit of Organizational Effectiveness Department."  August 31, 2013.  Accessed July 18, 2019.