How Does the Australian Criminal Justice System Respond to White Collar and Corporate Crime? Essay

Pages: 7 (3213 words)  ·  Bibliography Sources: 9  ·  File: .docx  ·  Topic: Criminal Justice

¶ … Australian Criminal Justice System respond to white collar and corporate crime?

Crimes are breach of the law. Criminal law as in the common law differentiates between crimes that mala per se' that is crimes that are repugnant to humankind for example, murder, robbery and so on which forms the basis of the penal code. There are crimes that are caused by activities that the state prohibits or by social customs called 'mala prohibitia'. While the activity may not be repugnant to human kind, it becomes a crime on account of statute. Some examples include the bar on persons below a stipulated age to drive motor vehicles. Although a teenager at the wheel of a car is dangerous, it is not a crime that is repugnant to the whole of mankind. The crime is thus a crime that is caused by violating a statute. A better example will be the smoking regulations. Smoking has been banned in some public places but is not a crime for a person to smoke in his home. Now the same act becomes a violation where it is indulged in a place where it is prohibited. Earlier the definition of crime centred on physical harm caused to individuals and property and both the parties were identifiable. ("Definition of white collar crime" (from the scanned reference mailed by client -- book title not clear) Please insert book title here)Download full Download Microsoft Word File
paper NOW!

TOPIC: Essay on How Does the Australian Criminal Justice System Respond to White Collar and Corporate Crime? Assignment

That is a did some harmful act of which B. can complain. There is a great difference between these types of crimes and white collar ones. Distinguishing between these types of crime is necessary in the analysis of the 'white collar crime'. This is because the crime defined as 'white collar' crime actually may fall into both these categories. For example if a clerk embezzles money from the cash box it is theft. If another person diverts money online from one account to his own he also commits theft. But the modus operandi for them is different. The thief online has to be a technically competent and educated person who is probably in a better position of trust and therefore the crime becomes all the more repugnant.

It therefore follows that crimes that are defined as white collar essentially has a boundary -- first at a work place or profession or some entity that has transactions and employees and second degree of learning or training that makes the individual capable of committing the crime. 'The blue collar criminal' or the worker may be a person who, like the clerk just embezzles cash from the till. Are these the boundaries? Is the crime the white collar criminal commits mala per se or mala prohibitia? How do these crimes occur and what is being done about it? These shall be the subject matter of this paper. To begin with therefore the definitions and parameters of the 'white collar crime and the position of the state and the laws have to be examined.

The Background

Edwin Sutherland introduced the term white-collar crime in 1939 in the paper "White-Collar Criminality," at the American Sociological Society Meeting. (Price; Norris, 2009) He showed the interrelationship between business and crime. The highlight of the paper was the statement that "robber barons of the late 1800s" evidenced practices similar to those of business and professional men of the 1930s, including physicians," he also pointed out that the criminals are a power lobby and the victims weak. Thus white collar crimes then can be defined as those crimes that are committed by educated and high placed individuals. That these crimes are committed by individuals in the top rung of the society makes the crime more reprehensible and dangerous.

However there are still controversies over which crimes can be strictly defined as white collar. The scope and ambit has indeed become large. The question then is if we can add the economic crime, violation of statutes other than criminal law as white collar crime. Some of this is resolved when we consider definitions of the crime as stated by Friedriech who divides these into categories like 'occupational crimes' and 'corporate crimes'. (Hayes; Prenzier, 2007)

Further crimes committed by the state are also included and the special category added is computer crimes. There are also financial crimes and scams. Well some of these could be crimes per se and some on account of state prohibition and regulation. Thus we can say that white collar crime can belong to the category mala per se and also mala prohibitia. The types of crimes that are sought to be defined as white collar crimes, it is argued cause extensive harm to the society and these crimes are mostly committed by the powerful people in the society. (Hayes; Prenzier, 2007)

There is a greater chance that these people also avoid being punished. Such crimes tend to cause illness and death work place accidents and other calamities on a large scale. The crimes in this category can be of the type where the culpability falls within the established justice system and penal procedure. For example a careless safety procedure causing death may be one example. These are dealt with by the customary law. However certain crimes like falsifying accounts, evading taxes and operating without license and in the case of some medicines falsifying the records to make an unsafe medicine as safe, all these are not detected and are dealt with by different departments that may not be directly connected with the justice department or the jurisdiction of law enforcers. (Hayes; Prenzier, 2007)

From the range of the crime it would be clear that it is not possible to deal with all the types in a single paper. Therefore to illustrate the content of the topic it is necessary to accommodate only one type of crime for discussion. In modern times the corporate entity has become the hub of controversy and is always in the news for one or another alleged crime. Corporate crimes - with the legal fiction operating that corporate entities are 'persons' in the eye of law, it would be appropriate to dwell on this type of offenders. Firstly the fact that the corporation is made up of its officers must not be forgotten. What makes the officers commit transgressions is explained by the pressure of the market and corporate objectives. The transgressions in the company and the business world are often put down to reasons like competitive environment, and the type of the organization and its ethics. What regulations control the activity of the company then determine the nature of the crime. (Schlegel; Weisburd, 1992)

It is therefore now clear that corporate crimes are of two types, those perpetuated by the corporation as an entity and those committed by its agents and servants defrauding the corporations and stake holders. While the second class is also roped into white collar crime they are mostly crimes that are also crimes that can fall into the category of theft and so on, but the corporate crimes as an entity are a class apart.


Taking corporate crime as a class, Braithwaite (1985) argues that there can be only generalizations as to what must be classified as white collar crime. There is a general belief that firms that are in financial difficulty resort to for survival. It is argued that pressure downward create the tendency to cut corners and then create a system that is evasive of the law. The agencies that are in charge of controlling these offences thus have to contend with litigation and though the agencies prefer direct action over this and the community supports punitive measures over corporate fraud, corporate represent the upper class interests and thus has created the practice of occupational crime and corporate crime. Researchers have shown that today corporate crimes are viewed more seriously than street crimes and while it was believed earlier that the general public is indifferent to crimes of the elite, it is now shown that the public believe that the white collar crime are serious. Among the crimes, some of them have been rated as more serious than others and some white-collar crimes are ranked as more serious than street crimes. (Piquero; Carmichael; Piquero, 2008)

It has also been shown that the corporate criminality shows repetitive patterns or recidivism. The research conducted by Simpson and Koper (2006) which was based on event history analysis, showed that for a sample of 38 corporations the recidivism patterns showed that punishments of severe nature often end the criminal behavior. Thus punishment decreases the likelihood of a firm's re-offending. Thus corporate deterrence using measures like the antitrust law and the economic conditions of the firm, will determine the responses. The researchers observed that industry conditions drive corporations to illegality and thus the nature of the industry is a determining factor. (Simpson; Koper, 2006)

It is also to be borne in mind that competition, market pressure and the changes in legislation that make the business unproductive all turn the otherwise normal corporation to commit crimes.… [END OF PREVIEW] . . . READ MORE

Two Ordering Options:

Which Option Should I Choose?
1.  Download full paper (7 pages)Download Microsoft Word File

Download the perfectly formatted MS Word file!

- or -

2.  Write a NEW paper for me!✍🏻

We'll follow your exact instructions!
Chat with the writer 24/7.

Australian Criminal Justice System Is Shaped Largely by Society Discuss This Statement Essay

Criminal Justice System Juvenile Delinquency Identify Three Term Paper

Criminal Justice System Thesis

Change About the Criminal Justice System Term Paper

White Collar Corporate Crime Research Paper

View 200+ other related papers  >>

How to Cite "How Does the Australian Criminal Justice System Respond to White Collar and Corporate Crime?" Essay in a Bibliography:

APA Style

How Does the Australian Criminal Justice System Respond to White Collar and Corporate Crime?.  (2012, July 24).  Retrieved August 5, 2021, from

MLA Format

"How Does the Australian Criminal Justice System Respond to White Collar and Corporate Crime?."  24 July 2012.  Web.  5 August 2021. <>.

Chicago Style

"How Does the Australian Criminal Justice System Respond to White Collar and Corporate Crime?."  July 24, 2012.  Accessed August 5, 2021.