Benefits and Challenges of the International Monetary System Research Paper

Pages: 10 (3241 words)  ·  Bibliography Sources: 10  ·  File: .docx  ·  Level: Doctorate  ·  Topic: Economics

¶ … International Monetary Fund (IMF) was established to foster international monetary cooperation and secure financial stability between nations (Stephey, 2008). Over time, the fund has also served to facilitate international trade, contributed to the overall employment situation and economic growth. Many financial experts argue that the operation of the IMF has served to reduce worldwide poverty and its existence contributes significantly to the overall health of the world's economy (Chossudovsky, 1991).

One of the primary responsibilities of the IMF is to monitor the various economies throughout the world. Made up of 185 member countries the IMF is available for advice in an attempt to maintain economic stability throughout the world and to avoid any situation that might lead to economic crisis. It provides its members with a convenient forum for discussing issues that might impact economies on a local, regional, and international scale.

Buy full Download Microsoft Word File paper
for $19.77
One of the least understood functions of the IMF but one of its most important functions is to provide its member countries with the opportunity to obtain temporary financing (International Monetary Fund). Due to the fact that international trading has increased substantially in these days of globalization member countries often find themselves with severe balance of payment problems. Such problems occur when nations find themselves short of foreign currency to meet their financial obligations to other countries. The availability of these options afford member nations with a stop gap solution to their particular financial problems in an effort to alleviate international conflicts arising from temporary cash flow difficulties.

Research Paper on Benefits and Challenges of the International Monetary System Assignment

The IMF was founded in the days following the Second World War. The War had placed the difficulties of the Great Depression on the back burner but, once the War began to wind down, the various world governments and representatives from their financial institutions gathered at Bretton Woods, New Hampshire to discuss how to best avoid the situations that resulted prior to the War. At said conference only 44 nations were represented but the world's major economic powers, except those associated with the Axis powers, were present (Eichengreen, 2008).

The IMF provided stability in the international money market in the difficult days following the Second World War. The belief following the Great Depression was that financial institutions and markets often times become too powerful and that allowing them to become too powerful had the potential of destabilizing financial systems and, thereby, undermining individual economies. The turbulent times were lessened through the reliance on the U.S. dollar but in the 1960s the United States found itself embroiled in a costly war in Vietnam and facing the high costs of President Lyndon Johnson's Great Society programs. The combination caused the dollar to become vastly overvalued. As a result, the system of fixing the U.S. dollar against gold as dictated by the Bretton Woods agreement was abandoned (You, 2000). The world monetary system endured a period where the major currencies floated against each other. During this time, the members of the IMF were allowed to choose any exchange arrangement among five different styles: 1) allowing their currency to float freely; 2) pegging it to another nation's currency; 3) adopting the currency of another nation; 4) participating in a currency bloc; and, 5) forming a monetary union.

There were fears when the Bretton Woods system collapsed that it would have adverse effects on the world monetary system. Fortunately, the world monetary system did not collapse subsequent to the abandonment of the Bretton Woods system. Instead, the flexible exchange rates that developed after Bretton Woods as detailed in the 1972 Smithsonian Agreement (Solomon, 1977) seemed to allow the world's various money markets to adjust more easily to the higher oil prices that occurred in the early 1970s as a result of the actions of OPEC (Organization of the Petroleum Exporting Countries). The floating rate system has continued to the present but it does so subject to a great deal of criticism.

For a number of years now, international markets have suffered through worldwide stagnation. This stagnation has increased the need for many developing countries to request assistance from the IMF and for the IMF to involve itself more aggressively in the stabilization of exchanges rates in developed countries. Unfortunately, the IMF has failed both developing and developed nations and, in this period of increased globalization, the involvement of the IMF is more important than ever and yet, it is not forthcoming.

To examine how the IMF has failed in recent years it is important to understand how the IMF operates. The basic funding for the IMF is derived by requiring every member country to pay based upon the size of the country's economy and its corresponding influence in world trade and finance. Typically newly enrolled members are expected to pay at least 25% of their membership quota in either U.S. dollars, euros, yen or pound sterling. These currencies are considered among the world's most stable and, therefore, the most universally acceptable form or trade. The balance of the membership is payable in the new membership's currency. The monies generated from membership quotas are then used to provide loans to member countries on a short-term basis to cover balance of trade deficiencies.

Beyond its capacity to make short-term loans the IMF is also shouldered with the responsibility of monitoring the economic and financial affairs of its member nations. Historically, this service has been limited to assisting developing countries but is available to any nation requesting its assistance. This assistance is intended to help nations avoid or correct problems that might occur in a nation's economic, tax, or monetary policy. On occasion, the IMF is also available to provide advice and assistance in matters involving a country's exchange rate system or its basic financial stability.

As in any organization there are levels of influence. With 185 members it would be unreasonable to expect that every member would exercise the same level of power and influence but one of the primary criticisms leveled against the IMF is that the United States, as the organization's largest voting member, has used its power within the organization to promote its own political agenda. In essence, many members feel that the United States unfairly directs its power and influence with the IMF to direct funds in the direction of nations that fulfill a need in American foreign policy or who occupy a strategic position. These same members argue that they should enjoy a greater say in how matters are decided within the IMF.

Similar concerns have been expressed regarding the power and influence of the European nations. Although no one European nation enjoys the voting power of the United States, as a group, Europe's power is considerable. As evidence of Europe's power within the IMF is the fact that since its inception nearly every managing director of the organization has been European. Newly emerging economic powers like India and China are demanding that their roles within the IMF be increased and that the corresponding roles of the United States and the European nations be cut back.

Critics also argue that the IMF has seemingly lost sight of its original mission. When it was founded in the waning hours of the Second World War, the IMF was intended to provide guidance to the world's economy so that it could be stabilized prior to any major crisis developing such as the Great Depression. Now some critics argue that IMF has adopted a policy of leaving markets alone and of providing little or no direction or intervention. Historically, the IMF offered assistance to countries facing financial crisis by encouraging the use of expansionary economic strategies such as increasing expenditures, decreasing taxes, and lowering interest rates. The theory in the early years of the IMF was that such measures would stimulate the nation's economy. More available money meant a stimulated economy. Unfortunately, many critics now argue that the IMF has adopted an opposite approach and will now only lend struggling nations with loans if they cut their deficits, increase their taxes, and raise interest rates. By doing so, IMF critics feel that it has failed in its mission and become the pawn of the developed nations that dominate its executive board (Wessel, 1997).

Criticism of the IMF is not limited to the dominance of the United States and Europe as individual member nations but also at the financial institutions contained in those nations. Because a country's membership position with the IMF is determined by its overall economic influence in the international market the power and influence of its financial institutions are also enhanced. That is, banks and financial organizations within the United States and Europe enjoy for more influence on the decisions of the IMF and better far more from those decisions than do similar organizations in smaller countries. Critics argue that the result of this scenario is that the interests of developing and poorer developed countries are too often overlooked in favor of the United States and European commercial interests.

As one might expect there are also critics on the other side of… [END OF PREVIEW] . . . READ MORE

Two Ordering Options:

Which Option Should I Choose?
1.  Buy full paper (10 pages)Download Microsoft Word File

Download the perfectly formatted MS Word file!

- or -

2.  Write a NEW paper for me!✍🏻

We'll follow your exact instructions!
Chat with the writer 24/7.

International Economy Essay

International Political Economy in the U.S Term Paper

International Relations the International System and Global Term Paper

International Relations Globalization Thesis

International Capital Markets Term Paper

View 200+ other related papers  >>

How to Cite "Benefits and Challenges of the International Monetary System" Research Paper in a Bibliography:

APA Style

Benefits and Challenges of the International Monetary System.  (2011, July 8).  Retrieved February 25, 2020, from

MLA Format

"Benefits and Challenges of the International Monetary System."  8 July 2011.  Web.  25 February 2020. <>.

Chicago Style

"Benefits and Challenges of the International Monetary System."  July 8, 2011.  Accessed February 25, 2020.