Brief 7 Court Cases Term Paper
Pages: 4 (1075 words) · Bibliography Sources: 0 · File: .docx · Level: College Senior · Topic: Criminal Justice - Corrections
Court Briefs - 7 Different Cases
Business Case
Texas v. Johnson
Real Properties Case
Jeffrey A. Beard, Secretary, Pennsylvania Department Of Corrections, Petitioner V.
Ronald Banks, Individually And On Behalf Of All Others Similarly Situated
Intellectual Properties
Eric Eldred, Et Al., Petitioners V. John D. Ashcroft, Attorney General
Business and the Bill of Rights
Humana Inc., Et Al., Petitioners V. Mary Forsyth Et Al.
Administrative Agency
Timothy Booth, Petitioner V.C.O. Churner et al.
Torts Relating to Business
Douglas Spector, Et Al., Petitioners V. Norwegian Cruise Line Ltd.
Contracts
Montana, Et Al., Petitioners V. Crow Tribe of Indians Et al
BIBLIOGRAPHY
Business Case
Texas v. Johnson
U.S. No. 88-155 (1989)
Facts: In 1984, during the Republican National Convention in Dallas, Texas while participating in the "Republican War Chest Tour," deemed to be a political demonstration, Gregory Lee Johnson was charged with the criminal offence of... "the desecration of a venerated object in violation of Tex.Penal Code Ann. 42.09(a)(3) (1989)."
Issue(s): Is the ruling against Gregory Lee Johnson for the violation of TexPenal Code Ann. 42.09(a)(3) (1989) to be confirmed?
Issue(s): Is the conviction of Gregory Lee Johnson consistent with the First Amendment?
Get full
access
for only $8.97. Ruling: The Court of Criminal Appeals ruled, "No," regarding the issue in this case.
Because it reversed Johnson's conviction on the ground that 42.09 was unconstitutional as applied to him, the state court did not address Johnson's argument that the statute was, on its face, unconstitutionally vague and overbroad. We granted certiorari, 488 U.S. 907 (1988), and now affirm.
Minority Rationale
The Minority rationale contends that Johnson's "... conduct may be prohibited and, indeed, criminally sanctioned, because "his act... conveyed nothing that could not have been conveyed and was not conveyed just as forcefully in a dozen different ways." Post at 431. Not only does this assertion sit uneasily next to the dissent's quite correct reminder that the flag occupies a unique position in our society -- which demonstrates that messages conveyed without use of the flag are not "just as forcefu[l]" as those conveyed with it -- but it also ignores the fact that, in Spence, supra, we "rejected summarily" this very claim. See 418 U.S. At 411, n. 4." Highlighted part will be rewritten.
Comments: To be added.
Texas v. Johnson remained in the litigation process 5 years.
The jurisdiction for this case is the Supreme Court of the United States.
II. Real Properties Case
Jeffrey A. Beard, Secretary, Pennsylvania Department Of Corrections, Petitioner V.
Ronald Banks, Individually And On Behalf Of All Others Similarly… [END OF PREVIEW] . . . READ MORE
Business Case
Texas v. Johnson
Real Properties Case
Jeffrey A. Beard, Secretary, Pennsylvania Department Of Corrections, Petitioner V.
Ronald Banks, Individually And On Behalf Of All Others Similarly Situated
Intellectual Properties
Eric Eldred, Et Al., Petitioners V. John D. Ashcroft, Attorney General
Business and the Bill of Rights
Humana Inc., Et Al., Petitioners V. Mary Forsyth Et Al.
Administrative Agency
Timothy Booth, Petitioner V.C.O. Churner et al.
Torts Relating to Business
Douglas Spector, Et Al., Petitioners V. Norwegian Cruise Line Ltd.
Contracts
Montana, Et Al., Petitioners V. Crow Tribe of Indians Et al
BIBLIOGRAPHY
Business Case
Texas v. Johnson
U.S. No. 88-155 (1989)
Facts: In 1984, during the Republican National Convention in Dallas, Texas while participating in the "Republican War Chest Tour," deemed to be a political demonstration, Gregory Lee Johnson was charged with the criminal offence of... "the desecration of a venerated object in violation of Tex.Penal Code Ann. 42.09(a)(3) (1989)."
Issue(s): Is the ruling against Gregory Lee Johnson for the violation of TexPenal Code Ann. 42.09(a)(3) (1989) to be confirmed?
Issue(s): Is the conviction of Gregory Lee Johnson consistent with the First Amendment?
Get full

for only $8.97. Ruling: The Court of Criminal Appeals ruled, "No," regarding the issue in this case.
Term Paper on Brief 7 Court Cases Assignment
Analysis: In reaching the decision to overrule the lower court's The Court of Criminal Appeals determined that Johnson's conduct.".. was symbolic speech protected by the First Amendment: Given the context of an organized demonstration, speeches, slogans, and the distribution of literature, anyone who observed appellant's act would have understood the message that appellant intended to convey. The act for which appellant was convicted was clearly 'speech' contemplated by the First Amendment. reversed Johnson's conviction on the ground that 42.09 was unconstitutional as applied to him... The state court did not address Johnson's argument that the statute was, on its face, unconstitutionally vague and overbroad. We granted certiorari, 488 U.S. 907 (1988), and now affirm." Highlighted part will be rewritten.Because it reversed Johnson's conviction on the ground that 42.09 was unconstitutional as applied to him, the state court did not address Johnson's argument that the statute was, on its face, unconstitutionally vague and overbroad. We granted certiorari, 488 U.S. 907 (1988), and now affirm.
Minority Rationale
The Minority rationale contends that Johnson's "... conduct may be prohibited and, indeed, criminally sanctioned, because "his act... conveyed nothing that could not have been conveyed and was not conveyed just as forcefully in a dozen different ways." Post at 431. Not only does this assertion sit uneasily next to the dissent's quite correct reminder that the flag occupies a unique position in our society -- which demonstrates that messages conveyed without use of the flag are not "just as forcefu[l]" as those conveyed with it -- but it also ignores the fact that, in Spence, supra, we "rejected summarily" this very claim. See 418 U.S. At 411, n. 4." Highlighted part will be rewritten.
Comments: To be added.
Texas v. Johnson remained in the litigation process 5 years.
The jurisdiction for this case is the Supreme Court of the United States.
II. Real Properties Case
Jeffrey A. Beard, Secretary, Pennsylvania Department Of Corrections, Petitioner V.
Ronald Banks, Individually And On Behalf Of All Others Similarly… [END OF PREVIEW] . . . READ MORE
Two Ordering Options:
?
1.
Buy full paper (4 pages)

Download the perfectly formatted MS Word file!
- or -
2. Write a NEW paper for me!We'll follow your exact instructions!
Chat with the writer 24/7.
Supreme Court Cases Case Briefs for Five Term Paper …
Supreme Court Cases Douglas v. Independent Living Term Paper …
Docket of Supreme Court Cases: Chapter 14 2006-2007 Term Paper …
Tylenol Cyanide Case Study …
Analyzing Appellate Court Case Research Paper …
How to Cite "Brief 7 Court Cases" Term Paper in a Bibliography:
APA Style
Brief 7 Court Cases. (2006, July 8). Retrieved February 26, 2021, from https://www.essaytown.com/subjects/paper/brief-7-court-cases/882372MLA Format
"Brief 7 Court Cases." 8 July 2006. Web. 26 February 2021. <https://www.essaytown.com/subjects/paper/brief-7-court-cases/882372>.Chicago Style
"Brief 7 Court Cases." Essaytown.com. July 8, 2006. Accessed February 26, 2021.https://www.essaytown.com/subjects/paper/brief-7-court-cases/882372.