Article: Business Models Evolution

Pages: 6 (2175 words)  ·  Bibliography Sources: 12  ·  Level: Doctorate  ·  Topic: Business  ·  Buy This Paper

Business Models

Evolution of Business Models:

From Early 20th Century to Today - a Critical Analysis

Business models continue to grow in complexity and the level of integrative processes that are knowledge and intelligence-based. From the relatively simple production-based business models of the 1900s and early 20th century to the highly orchestrated, knowledge-based business models of Toyota to support their global production and supply chain system (Dyer, Nobeoka, 2000) or Google with its world-class advertising business model (Pynnonen, Hallikas, Ritala, 2012), information and intelligence have replaced manufacturing power. The intent of this analysis is to evaluate the evolution of business models from the 1990s to today, with specific attention paid to their progression from time-and-motion-based production to highly integrated knowedlge networks that seek economics of scale with information. These latter chases of business models have shifted the focus of entire industries away from a myopic, inward-centric concentration on production metrics to instead put the customer at the center of the business (Pynnonen, Hallikas, Ritala, 2012). Google credits its success with advertising and the myriad of other businesses it is in my concentrating on innovating around the customer first, including both businesses and consumers in that definition (Cagliano, Caniato, Spina, 2005). A business model it is purest form is a taxonomy of how an entity intends to deliver value to its customers (Kujala, Kujala, Turkulainen, Artto, Aaltonen, Wikstrom, 2011). The core comportments of a business model are first defined in this analysis followed by an overview of the historical progression of models through today. Following the historical analysis will be a comparative table illustrating the similarities and differences of each dominant type of business model.

The Foundational Elements of a Business Model

At their most basic, a business model is a taxonomy that defines how an entity will add value to customers through the transformation of materials, resources, expertise and knowledge. Studies of business models indicate taxonomies over time reflect the relative complexity of markets they serve and the broadening base of customer expectations they must meet to succeed (Rebelo, 2005). The core elements any business model needs to be complete include a definition of the business' core capabilities; customer value proposition including a clear statement of how the company is different than competitors; a clear definition of the target customer; clarity of the revenue and pricing model; distribution channel definition; partnership strategies and cost structure clarity (Linder, Cantrell, 2001) (Porter, 1986) (Weill, Vitale, 2002). From the initial business models that were entirely based on production efficiency and driving down per unit costs through economies and scale and heavy reliance on the build-to-inventory business model to the highly complex yet very agile business models of mass customization (Pynnonen, Hallikas, Ritala, 2012) business models have had to strive for agility to keep a business alive.

Analysis of the Historical Progression of Business Models

The initial business models of the 1900s were more oriented towards manufacturing efficiency and build-to-inventory with little focus on the customer and their unique requirements (Pensieroso, 2011). The rise of Alfred P. Sloan as GM of General Motors during the early 20th century was a direct result of how well he understood production efficiency-based business models and his strong-minded focus on determining Return on Investment (ROI) of each manufacturing operation (Rebelo, 2005). Sloan in essence became one of the leading executive evangelists for build-to-inventory production techniques. Sloan also pioneered the idea of a business model that could support highly segmented product lines as GM evolved into under his direction (Pensieroso, 2011).

Sloan had set the foundation for a revolution in business models that would occur in the mid- and late decades of the twentieth century. It was clear that the traditional build-to-inventory and build-to-stock business models, even with his invention of advanced financial metrics including ROI and Return on Assets (ROA), would scale to a level of profitability necessary to deal with the extreme economic fluctuations of the American economy (Pensieroso, 2011). Sloan and his contemporaries through the 1940s and 50s began experimenting with multi-project-based business models that were also designed to be agile enough to support multistage and multidivisional requirements (Wikstrom, Artto, Kujala, Soderlund, 2010). Lessons learned during the second world wars' production runs regarding economies of scale, more agile-based approach to specialization of labor, and a focus on lean manufacturing began to quickly evolve (Mitchell, 2005). As the U.S. And global economy enjoyed significantly economic growth during this time period, the need for agility and quickness of customization in business models wasn't required; the economy was sustaining businesses that exceled at delivering quality products with little to no major customization available to customers (Teece, 2010).

In the mid 1970s Dr. Michael Porter began work on the value chain, a business model concept hat would galvanize entire industries and provide a very clear link back to the financial metrics that Alfred P. Sloan has defined as critical including Return on Invested Capital (ROIC) (Porter, 1986). By the 1980s, value chain-based business models became dominant based on the manufacturing expertise and cost advantages of offshore producers that combined their business models with North American distribution and marketing organizations (Porter, 1986). Value chain-based business models also are responsible for the growth of the semiconductor, high tech componentry and many sectors of the high technology industry, as Japanese and Asian manufacturers embraced and extended many aspects of this framework (Porter, 2001). The ROIC-based extensions of this model has given companies based on this framework significant competitive advantage during an era when production efficiency and competing on lowering production costs was critical to market penetration

(Rebelo, 2005).

The next generation of business models shifted from being production-centric and focused on efficiency to placing insight, intelligence and knowledge of the customer at the center (Rebelo, 2005). Corporations' business models had grown extremely large, complex, and cumbersome and lacked the agility necessary to respond quickly to customers' unique requirements and requests. This led one management theorists to state that the existing business models of corporations had excelled so well at minimizing and mitigating risk (Shi, Manning, 2009) that they had forgotten hwo to serve the customer (Hamel, 2011). The era of the knowledge-enabled business model had begun. This era was marked by the strategic use of knowedlge and information, both within and outside the company. The Toyota Production System (TPS) and their high performance knowledge-sharing network is a case in point (Dyer, Nobeoka, 2000). This network allowed for suppliers external to Toyota to gain insights into customer forecasts in real-time and also plan their own production runs. The high performance knowledge sharing network business model also set the foundation for process re-engineering-based business models that took the concept of knowedlge engineering the next logical step and began redesigning entire workflows throughout corporations (Hamel, 2011). With the added speed and performance of processes that had been completely redesigned from the ground up, the next generation of business models predicated on e-business (Porter, 2001), the e-business design network (Cagliano, Caniato, Spina, 2005) and business model design with multi-model management (Wirtz, Schilke, Ullrich, 2010) organizations were finally able to attain a higher level of agility, customer focus, and the ability to customize products and services in real-time to customer requirements (Pynnonen, Hallikas, Ritala, 2012). In this latest phase of business models the orientation has changed to reflect more of a market- and customer-driven set of priorities that permeate the entire value chain of a business. These changes have also re-architected the traditional value chain as originally defined by Dr. Porter (Porter, 1986) nearly three decades ago. No longer static and highly regimented as Dr. Porter initially envisioned it, today's value chains are much more fluid and demand-driven, concentrating on the customer experience and potential to provide a highly customized experience. This latest generation of business models has provided the foundation for entirely new businesses unforeseen even a decade ago, which signals this is an area of rapid change in new venture development (Kujala, Kujala, Turkulainen, Artto, Aaltonen, Wikstrom, 2011).

Comparative Analysis of Business Models

Business Model

Common Characteristics

Differences

Comments

Build-to-Inventory

Build-to-Stock

Highly structured, inflexible approach; values stability and doesn't deal well with customer-driven change

Comparable to project-based business models in the multiproject and multidivisional structures

Very inflexible business model that put the core focus of activity on internally generated metrics

Multiproject, Multistage, Multi-Divisional Models

Legacy support from the Build-to-Inventory Model; comparable to value chain model in terms of Manufacturing Resource Planning)

Unique approach to project-based manufacturing; nascent design for knowledge-sharing model, strengthened by value chain business model phase

Outgrowth of the 2nd World War and division of labor practices being seen as critical to business model success; still lacked agility

The Era of the Value Chain-based Business Model

Dr. Porter's revolutionary (at the time) model that shows the division of functional areas to those that directly deliver profit; fits well into multiproject-based business models

Unique in defining the division of labor by functional areas; never been done before

Immediately accepted as division of labor set the foundation for its acceptance; proven to deliver profitability

High Performance… [END OF PREVIEW]

Business Modeling Business Model Hewlett Packard Research Proposal


Costco's Business Model? Is the Company Research Proposal


Evolution of Business in the Information Age Research Paper


Brick and Mortar to Ecommerce Business Plan Business Plan


Impact of Big Data on Business Strategy Term Paper


View 1,000+ other related papers  >>

Cite This Article:

APA Format

Business Models Evolution.  (2012, August 15).  Retrieved September 21, 2019, from https://www.essaytown.com/subjects/paper/business-models-evolution/8834623

MLA Format

"Business Models Evolution."  15 August 2012.  Web.  21 September 2019. <https://www.essaytown.com/subjects/paper/business-models-evolution/8834623>.

Chicago Format

"Business Models Evolution."  Essaytown.com.  August 15, 2012.  Accessed September 21, 2019.
https://www.essaytown.com/subjects/paper/business-models-evolution/8834623.