Canadian Politics Research Paper

Pages: 12 (3884 words)  ·  Bibliography Sources: 12  ·  File: .docx  ·  Level: Master's  ·  Topic: Government

The exhibition was to be held in mid-September to October in the year 1995. It overlapped the date of the October crisis itself and was to serve as the 25th anniversary of the event. In addition, a play was also scheduled with the art exhibition in order to reenact the event. (Gessell, 2012)

When the national gallery of Canada expressed the desire of collaboration with the art community, Tourbin talked to its representative in order to ensure the collaboration between OAG and NGC. It was decided that the National Gallery of Canada will collaborate with the Ottawa Art Gallery and exhibit the La crise d'octobre along with four new paintings. This was the deal between the National Gallery of Canada. (Mclennan, 2014)

Meanwhile, the Ottawa Art Gallery continued its exhibition and Tourbin was interviewed by a reporter. In his interview, Tourbin revealed about his upcoming exhibition in the National Gallery of Canada. The story was given a twist and the reporter related it with the upcoming Quebec referendum. Following this, the National Gallery of Canada cancelled the exhibition and passed some offensive remarks on the artist, which were caught on the recording machine. (Mclennan, 2014)

The National Gallery of Canada cancelled the exhibit because of the political reasons. Although the reasons were never clearly mentioned in any of the interviews following the cancellation, but still it was obvious that there was pressure on the national gallery of art. The matter of October crisis was already critical and the Quebec referendum of sovereignty was to follow. Therefore, the NGC would have thought about the political situation before starting the exhibition. (Rynor, 2014)Buy full Download Microsoft Word File paper
for $19.77

In addition, there was a widespread commotion about the exhibition and the political conditions at that time. Keeping that in view, the National Gallery of Canada would have thought about changing its decision related to the exhibition. The material may have resulted in an incendiary reaction from the people and political leaders as well. Keeping that in mind, one can easily justify the decision made by the National Gallery of Canada. (Rynor, 2014)

Research Paper on Canadian Politics Assignment

On the other hand, the drawings were currently being shown in the Ottawa Art Gallery and the people already had the news of the drawings. Therefore, the cancellation of the exhibition was not necessary as the drawings had already influenced the people. Therefore, the National Gallery of Canada had more than the reaction of the people worry about as this was a political issue and was very critical with the referendum approaching. So, the National Gallery of Canada did feel that the public may not perceive the real nature of the drawings and may give incendiary reactions but there were other pressures acting on them as well. (Scappatura, 2012)

The October crisis was about the abduction of Pierre Laporte. The issue attracted the attention of Tourbin and he started his work on the topic. No matter how clear the work is, there is always a chance of misinterpretation. Therefore, the people of Canada would have misinterpreted the intentions of the artist. With a referendum coming about the separation of Quebec, a drawing made about the mistakes and acts of terrorism by a party supporting a sovereign Quebec could have put everyone in a doubt. (Robertson, 2006)

On the other hand, Tourbin was famous as an artist and not a conspirator or supporter of a political side. People used to love his work whether it was about politics or not. In addition, the work of an artist is seen as expression of thought. Therefore, the people would have seen it as an element of interest rather than an influential drawing. (Robertson, 2006)

To sum up, the drawing would have affected people's thinking even though it was not intended to. The reason behind this is the time of the exhibition. The referendum was closing in and the people had their minds fixed at that. In such a time, the exhibition could have triggered a decision people did not want to take. (Robertson, 2006)

On the contrary, if the exhibition had not been held, the people would have participated in the referendum without being affected by the work of the artist. The referendum result would have consisted wholly of the thoughts of the people. (Robertson, 2006)

Such exhibits have the power to change the way people perceive history. The exhibition cancelled by the National Gallery of Canada could have changed the thoughts of the people. First of all, the drawings in the exhibition consisted of the news and images of the abducted politician. The politician was kidnapped by the Front De liberation du Quebec which was the separatist party supporting the idea of an independent Quebec. The exhibition also consisted of a speech of Tourbin expressing his thoughts about the matter. If the exhibition had went on, it would have changed the historical facts in the minds of people in many ways. (Robertson, 2006)

Firstly, the people would have certainly developed a doubt for the thought of an independent Quebec. The October crisis, created by the terrorist activities of the sovereigntist party of Quebec, resulted in extra power given to the armed forces. This, in turn, led to numerous arrests without warrant and bail. A huge number of people were arrested and it only few were released without charges. Having being reminded about this, the people would have somehow refuse the idea of a sovereign Quebec. (Robertson, 2006)

In addition, the work of Tourbin in the exhibition also had the ability to change the history of expression of thoughts and news. The way he used collages with sentences changed the way people got the news of an event. This style, along with media exacerbation made the issue more critical. The political leadership organizing the referendum was also a separatist party and therefore the effect of the exhibition on the history would have been imperative. (Robertson, 2006)

The National Gallery of Canada exhibit was cancelled because of the political environment at the time and the risk of the people misinterpreting the drawings. The drawings portraying the October crisis were not intended to create a political turmoil but they contained a powerful message and therefore, it had the power of altering the thoughts of people about the way they had seen the events until now. (Robertson, 2006)

Cancellation of the Exhibition and the Charter of Rights

According to the Canadian charter of rights, an individual has the freedom of thinking whatever he wants and expressing it without being silenced. The charter also gives the people right to press. This means that the people can publish and read the published materials. The Supreme Court of Canada gives these rights to the people of Canada. Tourbin, being a Canadian resident, had all these rights. (Justice Laws Website, 1982)

When the National Gallery of Canada cancelled the exhibition, it was acting against the charter of rights as Tourbin had the right to express his feeling and people, on the other hand, had the right to know his ideas. Therefore, the National Gallery of Canada made a decision that was against the charter of rights. The NGC also faced a lot of criticism related to their decision by the artists all over Canada and Tourbin himself. In addition to that, NGC also backtracked on its contract that it made with Tourbin and therefore infringed the right of Tourbin once again. (Justice Laws Website, 1982)

There are rules limiting the expression of thoughts if they portray violence and other thoughts that go against other laws of the state. If a person is expressing thoughts that will incite other people, then he should be stopped. The drawings made by Tourbin, however, did not portray violence. They had a message that would have influenced the people but it did not promote violence nor did it instigate the people to break any laws. Therefore, the cancellation of the exhibition was a blatant act against the charter of rights. Moreover, the use of abusive words against the artist was also considered against the charter of rights. (Justice Laws Website, 1982)

Tourbin's Drawings and Canadian Unity

The drawings consisted of the details and events of the October crisis. It reminded the people of Canada about the sovereigntist political party that engaged in terrorist activities. This showed them the crimes committed by the party demanding independence. The kidnapping of two political personalities and the execution of one of them put the government in grave pressure and they had to call the military aid. (Robertson, 2006)

The events that followed were more disastrous as the people of Quebec were arrested without warrant and bail. This led to hundreds of people getting arrested whereas only few were released. The government also dissolved the FLQ making it responsible for committing the heinous crimes. The government let the troops in the city and this was a part of the headlines. Tourbin incorporated these headlines with drawings. (Robertson, 2006)

The drawings had the ability to instigate the people against the government as they were reminded about… [END OF PREVIEW] . . . READ MORE

Two Ordering Options:

Which Option Should I Choose?
1.  Buy full paper (12 pages)Download Microsoft Word File

Download the perfectly formatted MS Word file!

- or -

2.  Write a NEW paper for me!✍🏻

We'll follow your exact instructions!
Chat with the writer 24/7.

Canadian Politics Term Paper

Canadian Politics Labour Thesis

Canadian Politics Labour Term Paper

Canadian Social Policy Essay

Canadian Federal Elections Term Paper

View 200+ other related papers  >>

How to Cite "Canadian Politics" Research Paper in a Bibliography:

APA Style

Canadian Politics.  (2014, April 10).  Retrieved September 29, 2020, from

MLA Format

"Canadian Politics."  10 April 2014.  Web.  29 September 2020. <>.

Chicago Style

"Canadian Politics."  April 10, 2014.  Accessed September 29, 2020.