in Traffic Violation Systems the United States System Versus the Day Fine Case Study

Pages: 20 (6323 words)  ·  Bibliography Sources: 20  ·  File: .docx  ·  Level: Master's  ·  Topic: Criminal Justice

¶ … Traffic Violation Systems: The United States System vs. The Day Fines

A Case Study in Traffic Violation Systems

The United States System vs. The Day Fines

There are various fines imposed on individuals in the world. Day Fines refer to Fines that are unit in nature. These fines are above a minimum value reflective of an individual's daily income. Offenders, people who are perceived to pay the Fines are consulted on their personal daily income before being made to pay for fines for offenses committed. Crimes have escalated in the world. The emergence of crimes in the society relates to increase in the number of individuals deemed offenders of justice and rule of law (Alarid & Del, 2011). As done in the U.S. alone, many individuals have been found guilty of offenses referring to diverse magnitudes. The essence of having the offenders guilty is for them to engage in routine measures and activities that serve to pay for the mistakes they made. Nonetheless, the changes of human interactions and inclusion of different mechanisms of punishment for guilt has transformed the manner in which individuals within an organization are able to respond to the offences done.

Download full Download Microsoft Word File
paper NOW!
There are different levels of crimes in the world. These crimes warrant a diverse response mechanism that helps to respond to the types of crimes committed by people. For instance, it is uncommonly possible to have offenders pay humongous amounts of money in response to the crimes they have committed. Financial punishment is considered as hard as physical punishment. Financial punishment is another alternative that can be used to instil punishment in offenders found guilty. Moreover, use of financial punishment amounts to eradication of prison times and congestion. The specialties of crime vary from one generation to another. In modern times, punishment does not have to take a direction of physical punishment and imprisonment. For instance, an offender can be made to pay for the crimes committed through a pay cut.

TOPIC: Case Study on Case Study in Traffic Violation Systems the United States System Versus the Day Fine Assignment

Use of day fines is an alternative to other forms of responding to guilty offenders. Many nations have involved the use of day fines. For instance, the U.S. has involved the use of day fines in tackling traffic offenses. Traffic offenders are punishment with financial payments that are made to the judging authority. In many cases, it is uncommonly possible to have consequences that require offenders to make financial instalments that ensure punishment has been made in the right way possible and with respect to the rights and obligations of the offender.

Day fines are a common and standardized making in many jurisdictions. Many jurisdictions have involved day fines as a way of responding to different crimes and offenders in the world. For instance, a number of nations like Fenno-Scandinavia, Finland, and other commonwealth countries have involved day fines as a means of eradicating prison congestions. Moreover, they help to reduce pile up of cases in the court systems of the country. Some other nations that involve the use of day fines include Canada, New Zealand, and Australia.

In Finland, day fines apply to crimes that are possible to punishment by fines. The country has involved the system since 1921. In most cases, most crimes are directed at individuals who have the ability to respond to fines positively. For instance, petty fines that do not warrant imprisonment can be overridden by the imposition of Fines.

In the United Kingdom, day fines apply to situations that are guaranteed to require immediate punishments. Nonetheless, the issuance of the fines is done based on the acceptance of the offender. Traffic rules are part of the sectors that deal with day fines in the United Kingdom and the U.S. The use of day fines reflects on the ideology that assumes a commonness of power and jurisdiction within a given state. The essence of day fines has transformed court systems and cases in many nations. Moreover, use of day fines has ensured that cases and fines are made effectively without inclusion of measures that become a burden to the dealing authorities (Gaines & Miller, 2013).

Some crimes are negligible but cannot go without punishment. For instance, minor littering is a crime that does not make sense if it sends someone to prison for two or more days. Such crimes can be sort by use of day fines. Congestion in prisons is reduced with involvement of day fines. In most cases, use of day fines applies to a number of crimes. Some of the crimes include water traffic, traffic crimes by pedestrians and drivers, minor crimes including failure for car inspections, crimes against Public Order Act, and many other crimes in the society. Such crimes have fixed fines that cannot be altered. Offenders are made to go through the crime system without wavering or failing to respond to every requirement. Moreover, it becomes less possible for crime victims to escape after committing crimes since such prosecutions happen almost instantly (Harris & Tichenor, 2010).

Fines are a method of criminal punishment. This method of punishment is as old as the criminal justice system. The system was applied in cases where the offenses were not serious enough to warrant incarnation. Nonetheless, the main challenge of using fines as forms of punishing crime was on fixing equitable fines that suited crimes committed. The National Institute of Justice has established a plan of dealing with crime offenses that can be punished by application of fines. The establishment of the financial judges is reflected from the nature and magnitude at which crimes are rated in the society by the justice system nonetheless, crimes committed in traffic avenues are punishable by imposing financial constrains to the offender. The court systems are responsible for establishing a common ground that suits establishment of necessary tools of trade in order to deal with crimes in the society. Part of the changes effect on capabilities to live within the extremes of finding order after punishing traffic offenders sin the society (Tonry, 1997).

How the United States, at the state level, understands a traffic violation system with the European system, the day fines

A substantial fourteen million Americans are arrested every year in the U.S. These arrests are made on grounds of different crimes committed within and outside the country. More criminals are brought to the court for sentencing. Nonetheless, it has been difficult for the judges to administer equitable judgement since most of the offenses are intermediate and cannot qualify a number of garnishments. With such a perception, the U.S. has tried to establish day fines as a way of reducing congestion to the present modes of punishment, and entry of criminals in prisons. The judges have been experiencing limited alternatives over which they can be able to carry out their judgements. For instance, the only principled sanctions are probation, imprisonment, and fines.

Fines are seen as a legible way of offering punishment to a number of offenders without having to reconsider on the emergence of difficulties among the judges. Nonetheless, the state sees a possibility of difficulty among a number of members who are forging for equitable punishment. This is because use of day fines in the traffic systems is illegible to many individuals who may feel that they have been disadvantaged in one way or another. Fines are hard to impose. Moreover, many poor people are not legible to respond to this punishment. Imprisonment will be seen to favour the poor and let the rich escape imprisonment. Such a move will impose cases of unequal justice in the land of the U.S. And the world as a whole.

A number of countries like the Latin America have designed methods of administering Fines to individual offenders. These fines are directed at overcoming some shortcomings that have implanted the general activity of imposing fines to criminal offenders. The fining system designed is called day fines system. Day fines are viewed by the state as backward channels of punishment. These punishments provide precise methods of calibrating fines depending on the gravity of the offense and the ability of the offender to respond. Through this concept, the state manages to determine the amount of punishment required over an offender in relation to the amount of money to be paid.

In most cases, units of punishment are established over which they are substituted with financial correspondences. The punishment units are general to every offender after committing a crime. Commitment of crime is a general undertaking that is considered to navigate along certain paradigms of punishment by the state. Establishment of units is categorical to the magnitudes of punishment to be influenced on individuals. For instance, it is remarkably easy to have magnitudes that coincide with the amount of financial capabilities of the offender. In most cases, the judges fix one unit of punishment to resemble a day's payment. Through such a manner, they will be able to establishment a basement over which they can deal with problems that arise due to insufficiency of funds by many offenders.

Days punishment has a… [END OF PREVIEW] . . . READ MORE

Two Ordering Options:

Which Option Should I Choose?
1.  Download full paper (20 pages)Download Microsoft Word File

Download the perfectly formatted MS Word file!

- or -

2.  Write a NEW paper for me!✍🏻

We'll follow your exact instructions!
Chat with the writer 24/7.

Walmart 2007 Research Proposal

Illegal Immigration it Has Been Pointed Out Term Paper

Illegal Immigrants in the U.S Term Paper

Malware Since the Earliest Days of Humankind Term Paper

Policing Liquor Licensed Premises in Hong Kong Research Proposal

View 200+ other related papers  >>

How to Cite "in Traffic Violation Systems the United States System Versus the Day Fine" Case Study in a Bibliography:

APA Style

in Traffic Violation Systems the United States System Versus the Day Fine.  (2013, February 17).  Retrieved September 26, 2021, from

MLA Format

"in Traffic Violation Systems the United States System Versus the Day Fine."  17 February 2013.  Web.  26 September 2021. <>.

Chicago Style

"in Traffic Violation Systems the United States System Versus the Day Fine."  February 17, 2013.  Accessed September 26, 2021.