Term Paper: Chief Medical Information Officer (Cmio) Initiated Solely

Pages: 6 (2034 words)  ·  Bibliography Sources: 6  ·  Level: Master's  ·  Topic: Careers  ·  Buy This Paper

¶ … Chief Medical Information Officer (CMIO) initiated solely in the market value of clinical systems, it has developed into a dynamic category of its own. I will demonstrate how this CMIO position has become quite the cornerstone on the path to clinical prosperity.

How the CMIO Conceptualized:

Dating back nearly two decades, the overall concept of the CMIO has gradually yet immaculately cultivated into what it has become today. However, since its revelation, the CMIO has been quite the topic of praise along with a healthy share of disdain.

Like that old chicken / egg adage, the evolution of this position has developed right alongside the comprehension and the uniformity of all Information Technology (IT) employed; the Electronic Medical Record (EMR) and Computerized Physician Order Entry (CPOE) are still expanding and developing capabilities today unlike anything this industry has ever before seen. Accordingly, the lack of established education and comprehension. Also, this industry has seen many new jobs incorporated right along side with those positions that have been eliminated, and at a level never before seen. Skepticism inevitably restrains.

Regardless, once the smoke clears and emotions subside, greater development always comes about in the case of any advancement. The following list details such enhancement:

* Role of the CMIO "upgrades" right alongside the current IT. This creates job assurance while executing any intrinsically mundane weariness.

* Greater collaborative abilities

* Job assurance

* Up-to-date knowledge of several IT outlets

Itemized major "key points" in any written proposal:

1. Identify the audience (generalize various groups)

2. Be concise and descriptive (though not overly verbose) with the title

3. Be sure the summary is complete though to the point

Follow this link for a closer feel:

http://www.dof.ca.gov/fisa/bag/bcps.htm

(Summarized here)

Consider the following key points when writing your proposals:

KEY POINTS

• Know your audience.

• Have a succinct, descriptive title.

• Provide a clear and concise summary.

• Document needs/problems/opportunities, quantitatively, if possible.

• Quantify workload.

• Identify benefits to be achieved, quantitatively, if possible.

• Present and evaluate viable alternatives in terms of costs and benefits.

• Address history, risks and uncertainties.

• Document the required resources needed.

• Have an independent, skeptical person critically review the proposal before submission.

• Follow the instructions.

DISCUSSION

1. Know your audience. The primary audience within the Administration is your Department of Finance (DOF) Budget Analyst. The primary audience within the Legislature is your Legislative Analyst's Office (LAO) Program Analyst, and in some cases, fiscal committee staff. These are the people who must read and understand your proposal and explain it to others. Write the proposal based upon how much information will be needed to understand the request. Keep in mind that you are primarily trying to persuade the audience of your case.

2. Give the BCP a succinct descriptive title. The title and BCP number usually are the references to the request. It is helpful to have an easily remembered title for reference purposes for questions and discussions. This name usually becomes the title used in the DOF budget tracking system, which is used in various levels of Administration budget hearings.

3. Provide a clear and concise summary of the request. This should be a brief statement of what is being requested and why. This description should provide the minimum level of detail necessary for BCP discussion and decision meetings, and generally would be excerpted into the DOF budget tracking system. For these reasons, it is important that this narrative be brief, yet clear enough so that it can stand alone.

4. A well documented request will have self-contained answers in the analysis portion of the BCP to such questions and concerns as the following:

A. Nature of Request

What is the public need for the request?

What is being done now by your department and others to address the problem/need?

What resources are currently being expended in the base budget related to the request, i.e., dollars and positions?

Why can the problem not be resolved within existing resources?

What are the adverse impacts if this proposal is not approved? (Be realistic in this assessment.)

Why are current efforts insufficient?

How will the program be coordinated with other similar activities?

What is the priority of this request vs. other program activities in which the department is involved?

B. Background/History

What is the authority (state/federal law, regulation, Master Plan, etc.) for this program activity/service?

What clientele is being served, who benefits?

What is the history (recent) of similar proposals?

What have been recent program changes?

What other (similar) activities, past and present, address this general area and are they effective/efficient?

Are there examples from other States or institutions where this approach has succeeded?

C. State Level Considerations

What is the state policy (Governor, Legislature, Master Plan, Board of Trustees, etc.) concerning this issue, or a closely related one; and is this proposal consistent with such policy?

Why should the State assume responsibility for this change? (Why not private, federal, local, etc. )

What is the impact on other state departments?

D. Facility/Capital Outlay Considerations

What is the impact on facility/capital needs? (Will this program/positions require additional facilities? How will this need be met? Leasing, capital outlay project, other?)

E. Justification

How is this proposal consistent with the department's strategic plan? Be as specific as possible. At a minimum, identify the objective(s) this BCP will support.

Will this proposal actually solve the problem?

How does the proposal affect the quality of the governmental service being provided?

Is each component in the proposal absolutely essential or just desirable (needs vs. desires)?

Is this a high priority long-term need, and if so, how does the proposal affect the long-term problem?

Why is the recommended program level the correct one? Why does this have to be done now? Can it wait?

Are or can other non-state funding sources be made available?

Are program/proposal objectives set forth in quantifiable terms?

What facts and figures support the recommendation?

What statements/information from authorities and clients support the request?

What support/opposition is there to the request?

Any legal considerations?

Is the proposal technologically sound?

Include quantifiable workload/cost information, i.e., the basis for determining the level of activities that must be performed and the related number of personnel years (PYs) requested and the dollars requested. If the proposal involves a new program for which actual workload data are unavailable, the workload assumptions, and the basis for those assumptions, should be clearly set forth in the proposal. Provide functional descriptions of what staff or other resources will accomplish.

The BCP should identify what goal/objective is to be achieved and include a discussion or provide the criteria by which the success or benefits of the request can be judged. As an example, if a proposal were to establish a pilot or new program, the request should include evaluation criteria. That is, the proposal should set forth a plan including who will evaluate, how and when the evaluation will be conducted, and what will be measured. (NOTE: This may be more relevant in some program areas than others but certainly should be a consideration.)

F. Analysis of All Feasible Alternatives

Include an analysis of all feasible alternatives to addressing the problem. A position often taken by a department is that there are no other viable/possible alternatives. Such a claim is generally refuted, since DOF/LAO often suggest alternatives. Decisions on BCPs very often reflect these "other" alternatives.

A well documented proposal also provides alternatives and presents an analysis on why the selected recommendation best meets the problem/need, and indicates what adverse action would result if the request were denied. Such analysis should incorporate the assumptions/constraints, impact on benefits or quantifiable measures of effectiveness, risks and uncertainties (probability of success).

G. Timetable

Include a timetable for implementing the request -- steps necessary, PYs, and costs.

Question 2 (50%) 4 pages

The Board has accepted your proposals. They have now asked you to prepare a presentation on implementing these proposals. Using the models presented in Borkowski (Chapter 18) and Ransom (Chapters 15 and 16) explain to the Board how you will prepare and execute the processes necessary to create the climate for change and implement the change process. Describe each step and discuss the barriers (obstacles) to change and how you plan to overcome them. Be complete.

Example

Question 2 (25%)

Read Case Study 1 on page 141 and discuss this case using the process-based motivational studies of Chapter 6. See note above.

Expectancy Theory -- Vroom (1964) said that Expectancy Theory suggests that for a given situation, the level of a person's motivation with the performance will happen based on the person's desire for outcome, the perception of the individuals job performance related to obtain other desired outcomes and to perceive that his or her efforts will lead to the required performance. As we can see Sarah case seeks all of the things mentioned above. We can tell she is a determine woman who wants to give her best performance on the entire tasks at the highest… [END OF PREVIEW]

Four Different Ordering Options:

?
Which Option Should I Choose?

1.  Buy the full, 6-page paper:  $28.88

or

2.  Buy + remove from all search engines
(Google, Yahoo, Bing) for 30 days:  $38.88

or

3.  Access all 175,000+ papers:  $41.97/mo

(Already a member?  Click to download the paper!)

or

4.  Let us write a NEW paper for you!

Ask Us to Write a New Paper
Most popular!

Autonomy Rights and Medical Information Research Paper


Malaria Medical Information Description of Malaria Classification Research Paper


Information Systems and Strategy Finding a Path Research Paper


Information Technology: Telemedicine Solutions Offered to Remote Research Proposal


Information Systems Have Changed Essay


View 998 other related papers  >>

Cite This Term Paper:

APA Format

Chief Medical Information Officer (Cmio) Initiated Solely.  (2010, April 6).  Retrieved July 17, 2019, from https://www.essaytown.com/subjects/paper/chief-medical-information-officer-cmio/62671

MLA Format

"Chief Medical Information Officer (Cmio) Initiated Solely."  6 April 2010.  Web.  17 July 2019. <https://www.essaytown.com/subjects/paper/chief-medical-information-officer-cmio/62671>.

Chicago Format

"Chief Medical Information Officer (Cmio) Initiated Solely."  Essaytown.com.  April 6, 2010.  Accessed July 17, 2019.
https://www.essaytown.com/subjects/paper/chief-medical-information-officer-cmio/62671.