Collaborative New Product Development in Small Literature Review

Pages: 12 (3593 words)  ·  Bibliography Sources: 25  ·  File: .docx  ·  Level: Master's  ·  Topic: Engineering

Collaborative New Product Development in Small & Medium Businesses

Collaborative New Product Development Tools and Techniques in Small and Medium Businesses

For small and medium businesses (SMB) product introductions are one of the most significant sources of new customer, revenue and profit growth. As a result, the new product development strategies, tools, techniques and processes they rely on of a strategic importance. The objective of this analysis is to analyze and evaluate how small and medium businesses manage the new product development process using the collection of strategies, techniques, systems and processes.

Factors Accelerating Collaborative New Product Development Tools and Techniques Adoption

Balancing the five factors of development costs, product costs, product quality, revenue potential, and the pressure to attain a launch date to stay competitive to their industry, SMBs routinely prioritize their new product development initiatives across these five dimensions. The top four external factors that drive SMBs to adopt collaborative new product development tools and techniques include increasing pressure over shorter product lifecycles, globalization of markets and supply chains, an increasing distributed design environment, and the need for managing complex product development and production (Shamsuzzoha,Buy full Download Microsoft Word File paper
for $19.77

Literature Review on Collaborative New Product Development in Small & Assignment

Kyllonen, Helo, 2009) . These four factors combined account for over 75% of the investments SMBs make in collaborative new product development tools and techniques. Collaborating with their supply chain partners and service partners SMBs are seek to gain time and cost efficiencies from improved information and knowledge management throughout their supply chains (Tan, Tracey, 2007, 13-15). The payoff of having greater collaboration throughout their supplier networks over several product generations often leads to knowledge of processes and trust between suppliers becoming one of the core strengths of the company (Jenssen, Aasheim, 2010, 19). SMBs are finding that through the use of collaborative new product development platforms and design environments that are hosted and delivered on the Software-as-a-Service (SaaS) platform they can also scale geographically much more efficiently (Ottenbacher, Shaw, Ermen, 2006, 84-85). The growth of SaaS as a viable platform for the deployment of collaborative new product development tools and techniques has grown exponentially in recent years due to several factors. A major contributing factor is the ability of SMBs to scale their collaborative new product development strategies more efficiently and a lower cost than previous methods including the intensive effort required to be part of a broader development network. The SaaS platform has also made it possible for SMBs to manage more complex design environments and production workflows including build-to-order, configure-to-order and engineer-to-order workflows. These are critical for those SMBs whose product design and collaborative product development strategies are focused on markets dominated by mass customization. The adoption of collaborative new product development tools and techniques is being driven by the need many SMBs have to differentiate themselves through a mass customization strategy that gives them the flexibility of aligning their production expertise to the given needs of a specific audience and market segment (Burkett, 2006).

The growing adoption of Product Lifecycle Management (PLM) and Product Data Management (PDM) as techniques or strategies for better managing the collaborative new product development process is experiencing rapid growth due to the increasing complexity of product strategies as well (Weiping, Zhengqi, Biao, 2008, 57). For companies who produce make-to-stock or off the shelf products, PLM and PDM techniques and strategies are being relied on to ensure time-to-market and a competitive market position relative to industry lifecycles (Burkett, 2005, 12 -- 13). The greater the complexity of product or services being delivered, the more critical the need for centralized data and knowledge management, in addition to integrated data, process and product development collaboration throughout an SMB. It has also been found that the SMBs that are growing the most rapidly create national, regional and global networks based on collaboration with suppliers, partners and distributors much more effectively than their slower-growing SMB counterparts. They are able to successfully centralize innovation data and knowledge, integrate that data, process intelligence and expertise, including collaboration knowledge, into a global context much more effectively than their counterparts. Those SMBs getting the greatest results from their use of centralized innovation, data and knowledge are nearly four times as likely to engage in these strategies as competing firms in their same industry. The same also holds true for the adoption of highly integrated data, process automation and expertise, and skills learned for mastering collaboration (Ward, Runcie, Morris, 2009, 83, 84). For higher growth SMBs their organizations strive for this level of adoption as they have seen that the greater the level of pervasive adoption of PLM and PDM strategies the greater the propensity to attain and achieve time-to-market on complex products that require intensive levels of coordination and support. These higher-growth SMBs have learned how to create extended knowledge networks using PLM and PDM strategies as a foundation for greater supplier, partner and development coordination (Hackett, 2007, 45 -- 50). Over time, trust becomes an accelerator of these processes and the ability to attain shorter, more complex product lifecycles becomes attainable. These extended networks based on PLM and PDM platforms and strategies literally "learn" how to work with one another and as a result when trust increases so does the acceleration of key processes (Allocca, Kessler, 2006, 279 . This in many SMBs becomes a defensive competitive advantage, linking their supply chains, manufacturing and serving as a catalyst for future product development (Banker, Bardhan, Asdemir, 2006, 352, 440). The adoption of PLM and PDM techniques or strategies varies significantly across the entire base of SMBs with estimates at 13% or less having centralized product data and the use of process automation and collaboration. There have also been studies that indicate the value of PDM as a means of creating a single system of record in SMBs often gets implemented to solve a specific pain point in the new product development process and then is abandoned. This frequently occurs when coordination between suppliers of specialized components needs to be included in each phase of a collaborative new product development process. The development by an SMB of an entirely new electronics product or system for example forces the development of a PDM system so that the project can be completed. The majority of the time however the SMB will stop short of creating an enterprise-wide PDM once the initial need it was purchased or created for has been met. The same holds true with PLM systems, platforms and strategies. Once the initial process workflows have been defined and are working well enough to meet product launch timelines, many SMBs quit improving on this strategy or technique.

One of the most significant predictors of an SMB's potential for success with collaborative new product development tools is their commitment to using them across entire process workflows, not just selectively choosing specific areas. This is evident in the wide variation in performance SMBs attain on the New Product Development and Introduction (NPDI) process (Peterson, 2006, 38-40). The top-performing SMBs who have adopted PLM and PDM strategies across their entire business attain their product launch dates and timelines 81% to 100% of the time (Lofstrand, 2007). They attain this impressive result due to process integration internally and with suppliers and partners, analytics and data reporting, and the development of a strategic product portfolio management strategy. All of these factors combined increase the likelihood of an SMB being able to have enough process coordination and communication to ensure product launch dates are met (Shiu, Walker, 2007, 91, 92). Conversely SMBs that have only a partial level of integration across the core components of their PLM strategies and only sporadically manage processes attain their product launch dates between 21% to 80% of the time. It is anticipated that approximately 50% of the SMBs using collaborative new product development tools are capable of attaining their launch dates in this range. For the SMBs who have not adopted PLM and PDM-based tools and techniques, their changes is just one in five, or just 20% of making their product launch deadlines. Often these organizations rely on project-management-based tools and techniques in efforts to attain the product launch dates yet find these personal productivity applications cannot scale well enough to allow for collaboration. Microsoft Project is the most commonly used personal productivity application by these SMBs. Even through the use of shared folders and posting Microsoft Project files on Intranet sites within companies, this approach fails to integrate the broader PLM and PDM processes necessary to attain product launch timeframes and launch dates successfully (Johnson, Filippini, 2009, 15 -- 17) .

Conversely the use of PLM-based strategies that are strengthened with PDM systems are a critical success factor in SMBs being able to more effectively collaborate during new product development planning and execution. PDM systems deliver the necessary analytics, data, process intelligence and legacy data that further strengthen PLM strategy execution (Chen, Chen, Chu, 2008, 395). SMBs successful with integrating their PLM and PDM systems together concentrate on the collaborative new product development processes critical to their companies first, and then build out the… [END OF PREVIEW] . . . READ MORE

Two Ordering Options:

Which Option Should I Choose?
1.  Buy full paper (12 pages)Download Microsoft Word File

Download the perfectly formatted MS Word file!

- or -

2.  Write a NEW paper for me!✍🏻

We'll follow your exact instructions!
Chat with the writer 24/7.

New Product Acceptance in the Public Term Paper

Small Business Software Review Research Proposal

New Generation Technology Research Proposal

International Technology Management Research Proposal

Turbulent Times at Microsoft (Microsoft Has Drastically Term Paper

View 200+ other related papers  >>

How to Cite "Collaborative New Product Development in Small" Literature Review in a Bibliography:

APA Style

Collaborative New Product Development in Small.  (2010, April 20).  Retrieved July 3, 2020, from

MLA Format

"Collaborative New Product Development in Small."  20 April 2010.  Web.  3 July 2020. <>.

Chicago Style

"Collaborative New Product Development in Small."  April 20, 2010.  Accessed July 3, 2020.