Essay: Compare and Contrast Rhetorical Methods of Criticism

Pages: 3 (832 words)  ·  Style: APA  ·  Bibliography Sources: 2  ·  File: .docx  ·  Level: College Senior  ·  Topic: Black Studies - Philosophy

Buy full Download Microsoft Word File paper
for $19.77

¶ … Rhetorical Methods of Critisism

The Neo-Aristotelian Method of Criticism seems indeed to be the best method of criticism for Obama's speech, for several reasons, the most important one being the fact that his speech seems to be constructed on the five canons of classical rhetoric that Aristotle has presented. First of all, the use of the invention element is essential in Obama's speech. The story he tells does not necessarily need to be true, but it is an excellent introduction and a way to lure the audience towards the real purpose of his speech, which only comes in the second part of the speech: the slogan that is supposed to carry the state of Virginia in Obama's camp.

The organization of the speech, as well as the style and delivery, were also important and only the Neo-Aristotelian Method of Criticism could properly emphasize that, as well as the role of all these elements into Obama's speech. With these three elements mentioned here, the audience can both be made part of Obama's experience (when he is telling the story about Greenwood, the audience can actually feel as if it is there, in the rain outside, meeting with the small five feet tall lady from the town), which comes to show why style is so important in the senator's speech.

At the same time, the method of delivery needs to be analyzed as well, because it shows the importance of body language, as well as of the methods by which the speech is doubled in intensity and importance exactly because of additional elements such as intonation or body language.

Finally, the last element of the Aristotelian framework, memory, is also fundamental in a complete analysis of the text. Obama uses the Greenwood story to ensure that the point he is trying to make (again, re-emphasized with the slogan that comes out of the story) remains in the collective memory of the crowd listening to him in Virginia.

As one can see, the Neo-Aristotelian Method of Criticism is the best method to be used here mainly because the elements that this method of criticism uses are essential in order to ensure the success of the speech. Knowingly or not, Obama uses all five categories from the method in passing on his messages, which means that the method of analysis itself will have a good chance of pointing out some of the key elements from the speech and make the reader (or audience ) best understand the underpinnings… [END OF PREVIEW]

Two Ordering Options:

Which Option Should I Choose?
1.  Buy full paper (3 pages)Download Microsoft Word File

Download the perfectly formatted MS Word file!

- or -

2.  Write a NEW paper for me!✍🏻

We'll follow your exact instructions, guaranteed!
Chat with the writer 24/7.

Comparative Analysis of British and American English Multiple Chapters

Contrast Organic Fruits and Vegetables to Conventional Term Paper

Administrative Evil Article Critique

Rhetorical Analysis of the Ideologies of Gore's an Inconvenient Truth Term Paper

Psychological Reactions to Writing Revisions: Comparison Essay

View 79 other related papers  >>

Cite This Essay:

APA Format

Compare and Contrast Rhetorical Methods of Criticism.  (2009, May 7).  Retrieved December 9, 2019, from

MLA Format

"Compare and Contrast Rhetorical Methods of Criticism."  7 May 2009.  Web.  9 December 2019. <>.

Chicago Format

"Compare and Contrast Rhetorical Methods of Criticism."  May 7, 2009.  Accessed December 9, 2019.