Concept of State Term Paper

Pages: 8 (2782 words)  ·  Style: APA  ·  Bibliography Sources: 10  ·  File: .docx  ·  Topic: Black Studies - Philosophy

¶ … Western tradition evolved, through time and context the concept of the state, the nature of man and liberalism also evolved. With each subsequent common thought the concept of each refocused to meet the needs of the situation at hand, in a sense either bolstering the current situation of political rule or challenging it to change, in some manner, to better meet perceived needs. As the dominant political thought changed the emphasis on rule changed, to meet new needs. First divine right and legitimacy are seen as the natural state, then through examples of illegitimate use of power and the faults of rule the concepts of legitimate rule changed, as the goal of a society that would better meet more needs of the individual, a civil society evolved so did the idea of supremacy and state. The ideas of many men come together in this work to discuss this evolution through western tradition, each in turn influencing the other to bring about a somewhat complete idea of what is right and wrong and how the state is to appropriately act to solve its collective and individual problems.

Download full Download Microsoft Word File
paper NOW!
For St. Thomas Aquinas the order of the state and the laws of man and indeed even the inequality of man, developed as a part of God's divine plan. "...man is by nature a social and political animal, who lives in a community...One man...is not able to equip himself with all of theses things..." So, man must live in fellowship with others and in so doing there must be a guide, divinely determined as a more venerated man than others and he will guide the common good as per the plan of god. (Aquinas 5-6) This divinely guided better man, subject to the king of all kings is the natural head of the state, and God will guide him to make decisions regarding the use of power to keep the social animal man in line and others as close to his equal as possible.

Luther, calling to light the voluminous contextual works of the supposed righteous attempted to demonstrate that through faith, all works are good and that the building of anything or amassing of anything through any other impetus than faith is futile.

TOPIC: Term Paper on Concept of State Assignment

Let him who will be pious and filled with good works, begin and in all his life and works at all times exercise himself in this faith; let him learn to do and to leave undone all things in such continual faith; then will he find how much work he has to do, and how completely all things are included in faith; how he dare never grow idle, because his very idling must be the exercise and work of faith. In brief, nothing can be in or about us and nothing can happen to us but that it must be good and meritorious, if we believe (as we ought) that all things please God. (Luther 21-22)

Luther believed that through faith all works, were good and if a ruler or any man where to set aside his faith in the Lord through doubt that any works he did would be for not. The divine right to rule or guide can then only truly be exercised by truly pious men, not men who seek to prove faith over and over with good works or asking others to do one type of good work over another for their own gain.

Stepping from this base we must then see that these two men believed differently, while Aquinas believed that the very nature of the birthright to power gave a man the answers as to the right and righteousness of man while the other believed that the righteous could falter if he or she lost his faith. Optimism would seem to be the guiding force behind Aquinas while Luther contextually saw darkness in the deeds of men in power. Though this is not the complete story as Aquinas was writing form the ideal and Luther was writing from his own contextual experience of corruption. Each agreed that the use of power must be divinely guided, through faith and assurance of the good of one's deeds for the common, civil society. Through the base of these two writers there is a clear sense of the direction of thought on the subject of the development of the state, the given context of thought and society determines the subsequent development of society and the ideas that govern it. Aquinas was guided by a strong sense of the need to explore the ideal, to get back to it Luther was guided by the visible and plentiful examples of idolatry that he witnessed within the church and ruling class. Machiavelli was guided by the idea that through historical observation one can determine best and worst practices and therefore act upon them to maintain civil society.

When one thinks of the divine right to rule one of the first text, that comes to mind is Machiavelli and his Prince. The work has been separated from his other writings on government, namely republics by his own pen, yet in so doing he makes clear that he believes that the principality is a superior form of rule than others. (Machiavelli, Chapter II) in Discourses he states that if equality is not the general rule then a principality is the only logical form of rule, "That the Government is easily carried on in a City wherein the body of the People is not corrupted: and that a Princedom is impossible where equality prevails, and a Republic where it does not" (Machiavelli, Discourses, Chapter LV) as the Prince is such a practical work it does lend itself to the secular reader, it is not bound by faith but by practical observation of historical events, as seen by Machiavelli. He seeks to explore the historical good works and misdeeds of leaders to show the reader the most logical steps to maintain leadership. One interesting portion of the work describes the value of the new prince, or the prince who has risen to power through merit and opportunity, rather than birthright. In this section of the work Machiavelli, venerates those who have the power and use the given opportunity to make the right choices with regard to rule. He makes clear that one without the other would be vain but that men who recognize opportunity where it lays and have the skill to set about becoming new leaders are to be venerated above all others, giving the distinct impression that Machiavelli, though he venerates birthright leadership, for its ease recognizes that leaders can come from more common means and still be successful leaders. "But to come to those who, by their own ability and not through fortune, have risen to be princes, I say that Moses, Cyrus, Romulus, Theseus, and such like are the most excellent examples." (Chapter VI) These men of old followed all the important steps that Machiavelli lays out, they must either destroy the land or live within it to know of its ills before they become too great to overcome, keep your friends close and your enemies closer. Machiavelli contends that legitimacy can be inborn, through birthright but can also be inborn through greatness of character, ability, leadership and opportunity. Through venerating Moses, as a leader of men, Machiavelli reiterates the idea that there may be divine right in those who are not born to it, but that are the earpiece of the Lord. "And although one may not discuss Moses, he having been a mere executor of the will of God, yet he ought to be admired, if only for that favor which made him worthy to speak with God." (Chapter VI) Overarching Machiavelli's words is a departure, in that Machiavelli allows ambition to be a natural guiding force, but only when it is kept in check by rational ability to lead and acquire.

The wish to acquire is in truth very natural and common, and men always do so when they can, and for this they will be praised not blamed; but when they cannot do so, yet wish to do so by any means, then there is folly and blame. (Chapter III)

Ambition was hated by many, as the source of all evil deeds, as it was often inwardly driven and personal, and not of the divine. For Machiavelli, a much more practical thinker ambition was natural, the ability to lead should be learned and improved, throughout ones life and by example.

Machiavelli, interpreted historical rulers to give present rulers a better idea about the potential pitfalls of their works, be they divine or otherwise, with the strong implication that if they were not divine they would likely fail, as the divine, such as Moses would be guided to the right by faith, while those who step away from the divine are seen as unable to effectively rule, see Machiavelli's treatise on Louis of France. (Chapter III) Overall Machiavelli outlines the best and worst possible choices, and… [END OF PREVIEW] . . . READ MORE

Two Ordering Options:

?
Which Option Should I Choose?
1.  Download full paper (8 pages)Download Microsoft Word File

Download the perfectly formatted MS Word file!

- or -

2.  Write a NEW paper for me!✍🏻

We'll follow your exact instructions!
Chat with the writer 24/7.

State Sponsored Terrorism Term Paper


State Is the Single Most Important Actor in Achieving Sustainable Development Affirmative Research Paper


Measurement and Scaling Concepts Zikmund Research Proposal


Self-Concept Maintenance: Analysis of Self-Regulation, Social Comparison Research Paper


Mississippi Valley State University (Msuv) Research Paper


View 200+ other related papers  >>

How to Cite "Concept of State" Term Paper in a Bibliography:

APA Style

Concept of State.  (2007, June 3).  Retrieved August 3, 2021, from https://www.essaytown.com/subjects/paper/concept-state/7365866

MLA Format

"Concept of State."  3 June 2007.  Web.  3 August 2021. <https://www.essaytown.com/subjects/paper/concept-state/7365866>.

Chicago Style

"Concept of State."  Essaytown.com.  June 3, 2007.  Accessed August 3, 2021.
https://www.essaytown.com/subjects/paper/concept-state/7365866.