concise Analysis of Plato Essay

Pages: 7 (2187 words)  ·  Bibliography Sources: 2  ·  File: .docx  ·  Level: College Junior  ·  Topic: Philosophy

[footnoteRef:8] [8: Habib, Rafey. Identity and Difference: Plato and Aristotle on Democracy. Rutgers, 1998.]

Some of the arguments and criticisms made by Plato appear to be rational. However, upon closer evaluation, some that can be contented. One of the key aspects of Plato's argument is that democracy is unfair. This is because every individual is permitted to do as he desires and this gives rise in anarchy. Nonetheless, the idea that justice is associated to harmony is bizarre. In essence, justice encompasses what is deemed fair. However, it is not apparent that when Plato outlines the aspect of justice as harmony, whether he is speaking on justice. It is sensible to assert that justice is diligently linked to fairness. Nonetheless, it is plausible to think of an unfair harmony, too. Simply because a state is seeking a sense of balance, it does not imply that its leaders are reasonable or just. As a result, it appears that justice does not emanate from harmony and therefore it can be argued against Plato that democracy is not inherently unjust.[footnoteRef:9] [9: Scipii, Terikel. Plato on Democracy. The Red Lion Tavern. ]Buy full Download Microsoft Word File paper
for $19.77

Essay on A concise Analysis of Plato Assignment

A second principal dimension of Plato's critique of democracy that can be contended is his perception that democracy generated bad rule. Plato argues that the people, also referred as the demos, are significantly uneducated and their leaders dominate them. What is more, he outlines them as being short-sighted and illogical and as a result react to what they want rather than what they need. However, this argument fashioned by Plato against democracy is reliant on a fundamental assertion that people are uneducated and controlled by their desires. It can be contended that even with basic education, people cannot be equated to children that are unable to think rationally. Therefore, Plato's assertion that people are oblivious and ought not to be trusted with authority is not true. Secondly, even if people are not oblivious, it does not imply that they choose poor leaders or those that make poor decisions. In addition, it can also be argued that the practice of democracy is much better in comparison to the authoritarian government system recommended by Plato.5

In conclusion, the central points-of-view from Plato's criticism of democracy are all dependent on the existence of perfect knowledge. This necessitates the existence of a standard system of measuring or determining what is right. However, as indicated, it is improbable for there to be perfect knowledge. As a result, authoritarianism, which is recommended by Plato is intrinsically besotted with flaws. In the absence of a standard way of measure to offer guidance to an individual, there is no validation in granting power and authority to one person. Therefore, this means that even the philosophers, who are proposed by Plato, are not in any way better than the tyrant, with the exception that the philosopher considers that his actions are right for the state as a whole. Considering this, it is the intrinsic conflict and disharmony encompassed in democracy that makes it to be the most suitable form of government, as they are good foundations in the political formation of the state. The conflict precludes any one person from exercising too much authority, and necessitates a general agreement as to what is right when making decisions. As a result, the democratic state precludes the most horrible extremes of authoritarian rule and optimistically provides a process of development and a way of measuring this development.5


Bhandari, D. R. Plato's Concept of Justice: An Analysis. Boston University, 2016. Retrieved from:

Ferrari, Giovanni RF, and Tom Griffith. Plato: 'The Republic'. Cambridge University Press, 2000.

Friedlander, Paul. Plato: An Introduction. Princeton University Press, 2015.

Frostburg. Plato: The Failure of Democracy, 2016. Retrieved from:

Habib, Rafey. Identity and Difference: Plato and Aristotle on Democracy. Rutgers, 1998.

Scipii, Terikel. Plato on Democracy. The Red Lion Tavern, 2016. Retrieved from:,8356,1020,all

Sheppard, Darren J. Plato's Republic: An Edinburgh Philosophical Guide. Edinburgh University Press, 2009. [END OF PREVIEW] . . . READ MORE

Two Ordering Options:

Which Option Should I Choose?
1.  Buy full paper (7 pages)Download Microsoft Word File

Download the perfectly formatted MS Word file!

- or -

2.  Write a NEW paper for me!✍🏻

We'll follow your exact instructions!
Chat with the writer 24/7.

Plato and Hobbes on Justice Term Paper

Plato Phaedo Term Paper

Ethics of Privacy Is a Very Controversial Research Proposal

Global Governance Essay

Origen's Doctrine of Reincarnation Thesis

View 200+ other related papers  >>

How to Cite "concise Analysis of Plato" Essay in a Bibliography:

APA Style

concise Analysis of Plato.  (2016, November 2).  Retrieved July 12, 2020, from

MLA Format

"concise Analysis of Plato."  2 November 2016.  Web.  12 July 2020. <>.

Chicago Style

"concise Analysis of Plato."  November 2, 2016.  Accessed July 12, 2020.