Crime, Social Crime and Crime Against Research Paper

Pages: 8 (2551 words)  ·  Bibliography Sources: ≈ 15  ·  File: .docx  ·  Level: College Junior  ·  Topic: Criminal Justice

Crime, Social Crime and Crime Against the Person: Violence

One of the more challenging aspects of understanding crime is its ever-changing geographic and temporal qualities. Indeed, what is criminal in one place and time may be completely legal in another. Likewise, so-called "social crimes" have similar qualities that require careful analyses to place them into the appropriate context. Similarly, violent acts against another person may also involve contextual issues that must be taken into account when evaluating the criminality of such behaviors. After all, if people are trying to defend themselves and their families from harm, violence may be the only legitimate alternative that is available to them. To gain a further understanding of these three concepts, this paper provides a review of the relevant peer-reviewed and scholarly literature concerning crime in general, as well as social crimes and violent crimes against the person in particular. A summary of the research and important findings are presented in the conclusion.

Review and Analysis

What is Crime?Buy full Download Microsoft Word File paper
for $19.77

Research Paper on Crime, Social Crime and Crime Against the Assignment

Interestingly, a crime can either be an act of commission or omission. For instance, according to Black's Law Dictionary (1999), a crime can either be "a positive or negative act in violation of penal law" or "an offense against the state or the United States" (p. 370). In the United States, there are few crimes of omission, with the failure to file income taxes being among the more prominent examples of this type of criminal act. By very sharp contrast, the law books are full of crimes that involve acts of commission, but in each case, the specific context of the act must be taken into account in determining whether a crime has been committed. For example, Lanier and Henry advise that, "Because there are so many possible wrongs and because 'crime' denotes only a select sample of all disapproved acts, the definition of crime varies from time to time and from place to place and there is continuing controversy about what should or should not be called 'crime'" (p. 14). In some cases, it is possible to commit a crime ex post facto, although this type of crime is rarely punished. In this regard, Lanier and Henry note that, "Crimes are not produced by legislation alone. Judicial interpretation also determines what is or is not crime" (p. 15). Someone who had walked across an un-owned field on her way to work for several years, for example, may suddenly find her act a crime based on a newly enacted law or a judicial interpretation of an existing law, making the need for a new route to work necessary but there would be no corresponding criminality involved in such ex post facto acts, provided such acts ceased following such legal determination of their criminality. In fact, it may be possible for such an individual to establish a legal right to use this means of getting to work since she has established an easement of sorts over the years, making the determination of what is criminal all the more complicated.

Therefore, the overriding factor that is involved in developing a viable definition of crime is the need to consider the context in which the act took place. In this regard, Lanier and Henry report that, "An important consideration when defining crime is the observation that crime is contextual. Criminal harm takes different forms depending on the historical period, specific context, social setting, or situation in which it occurs. The written law might seem to provide an answer, but laws are open to interpretation" (1998, p. 13). In fact, the interpretation of crimes becomes especially subjective with respect to social crimes, and these issues are discussed further below.

Social Crimes

In general, Black's Law Dictionary defines social crime as, "A crime done in violation of those duties which an individual owes to his community, and for the breach of which the law has provided that the offender shall make satisfaction to the public" (p. 370). This definition is congruent with the general definition of crime set forth above, but it is distinguished by the additional requirement to "satisfy the public" as a form of restitution for the social crime committed (Hughes, 1998). Such restitution can assume an bewildering array of forms, but the primary emphasis is on identifying those criminal acts that carry a social consequence. For example, Lanier and Henry (1998) emphasize, "any definition of crime should take account of all offenses that are socially injurious or socially harmful" (p. 14). As noted above, there are also vitally important contextual aspects of crime in general and social crimes in particular that must be taken into consideration when determining the potential criminality of a given act. For example, Lanier and Henry point out that, "A problem with a strict legal definition of crime is that it ignores the cultural and historical relativity of law. What is defined as crime by the legal code varies from location to location and changes over time" (p. 14).

Two examples of the dynamic nature of the definition of social crimes can be found in the manner in which alcohol and tobacco have been viewed, regulated and criminalized and subsequently decriminalized over the years. According to Lanier and Henry, "Consider, for example, the criminalization of substance abuse. During Prohibition, the production and distribution of alcoholic beverages in the United States was illegal. Today, the same acts are generally legal" (p. 14). Likewise, in the 18th and 19th centuries and even up into the mid-20th century, tobacco was considered to be a healthy product and its use was even encouraged by the healthcare community as a medicinal product; however, the use of tobacco today is being increasingly criminalized (Lanier & Henry, 1998). Similarly, social crimes can be considered as illegal by the criminal justice system but still regarded as acceptable -- or at least justifiable -- behavior by the general public in ways that defy rigorous enforcement. For instance, McMullan and Perrier (2002) report that, "Gleaning, wrecking, smuggling, rioting, and exerting the right to traditional perquisites at work were all social crimes that were regarded as normative or at least justifiable on quasilegal grounds by large sections of the population, even though they were increasingly classified as 'real crimes' by the courts and the statute books" (p. 680).

Indeed, these same processes can be seen today as state after state in the U.S. completes the legal wrangling processes that are involved in legalizing marijuana, first as a medicinal product and then, ultimately and inexorably, as a legitimate product that should be regulated and taxed. In the interim, the casual use of marijuana by significant segments of the American population is being largely overlooked by many law enforcement authorities in various jurisdictions in favor of trying to catch "the big fish" that are involved in its introduction and distribution, but these same casual acts of marijuana use today were categorized as felonies on the law books of many states just a few years ago. Therefore, what may be a social crime today may not be one tomorrow, and vice versa, and likewise another crime that has these temporal and geographic contextual requirements is violent crime against the person, and these issues are discussed further below.

Crime against the Person: Violence

While at first blush, it may appear intuitive what types of acts constitute violent crimes against a person. If someone slaps or punches another person for no good reason at a bar or party, for example, the act is a violent one against that person and is therefore criminal. As with other types of crimes, though, even this type of crime has certain contextual and interpretive aspects that must be taken into account in the determination of the criminality of a given act at a given point in time. For example, police-reported incidences of crimes against the person have shown a marked increase in recent years, but there has not be a corresponding increase in the precise number of self-reported instances of this type of crime (Carrington, 1999). An analysis of violent crimes against the person data for two 3-year periods conducted by Carrington (1999) showed that the majority of these types of crimes were concentrated in sexual assaults, assaults causing harm, but there were also consistent patterns found in other violent offenses such as homicide, attempted murder, and aggravated sexual assault, as well as miscellaneous offenses against the person.

One explanation provided by Carrington for this increased law enforcement-reported incidence is the introduction of innovations in technology that have facilitated the collection and analysis of this type of data, but there are other forces at work in determining what acts qualify as violent crimes against the person as well. In this regard, Carrington reports that, "This [increased law enforcement reporting] could be due to legislative changes which related particularly to spousal assault, to administrative changes, such as adoption of 'zero-tolerance' policies by school boards; and/or to an increased willingness of victims and witnesses to report such events and of police to record them" (p.… [END OF PREVIEW] . . . READ MORE

Two Ordering Options:

Which Option Should I Choose?
1.  Buy full paper (8 pages)Download Microsoft Word File

Download the perfectly formatted MS Word file!

- or -

2.  Write a NEW paper for me!✍🏻

We'll follow your exact instructions!
Chat with the writer 24/7.

Crimes Against Children Shaken Baby Syndrome Term Paper

Hate Crimes the Definition Term Paper

Privacy Issues Raised by Social Networking Essay

White Collar Crime in Contemporary Society Economic Regulation and Social Essay

Crime in Chicago Research Proposal

View 200+ other related papers  >>

How to Cite "Crime, Social Crime and Crime Against" Research Paper in a Bibliography:

APA Style

Crime, Social Crime and Crime Against.  (2011, October 1).  Retrieved September 23, 2020, from

MLA Format

"Crime, Social Crime and Crime Against."  1 October 2011.  Web.  23 September 2020. <>.

Chicago Style

"Crime, Social Crime and Crime Against."  October 1, 2011.  Accessed September 23, 2020.