Essay: Dotmlpf System of Analysis

Pages: 4 (1343 words)  ·  Bibliography Sources: 4  ·  Level: Master's  ·  Topic: Military  ·  Buy This Paper


[. . .] George S. Patton synthesizing his leadership skills with his material assets available to him in World War II. Patton's leadership, and all it has to teach us, needs this stage, made and consisting of material resources that helped define his greatness through example. Tegnella (2007) expressed the need to focus and shift the leadership efforts to eliminating WMD proliferation demonstrating the material factors dictating the effects of the other components . Once again I would like to highlight here the codependence of each facet on one another, but also demonstrate that the material resources reserves a special place within the system.

In this discussion, overlapping themes are impossible to ignore and this, undoubtedly by design, improves the interdependence and reliability of the DOTMLPF approach to systematic analysis. So our next facet to compare and contrast with material, personnel, blends into some of the aforementioned categories as well. Since training and personnel have an explicit relationship, we see a similar relationship between personnel and material. It is shown not only in the acquisition of personnel, but in the maintenance and reenlistment of personnel as well. The challenges of today's soldiers are new and interesting. Many soldiers have experienced war fare in an entirely new method for extended periods of time. In order to support this model certain material needs are prerequisite. It is hard to imagine sustaining the force using the material and material acquisition techniques of just 20 years ago. The demands of our soldiers will always be changing, and it is important that the understanding of what materials will help us succeed on the battlefield change is in harmonic convergence with these changes in our fighting forces and their needs. The quality of materials affects the soldiers varying ways to further create dependence of our system on the material aspects of its nature.

In comparing the facilities to the material domain, we see a relationship that is almost strictly dependent and unique. Deciphering between facilities and materials may not always be easily accomplished. Once again, this crossover demonstrates the strong functionality of the system itself and shows the unique way in which balance may be achieved through an interweaving system of coordinating domains. Some examples of how materials affect facilities connected with defense of our nation are defined by the sourcing nature of the material aspect towards the character and quality of the particular facility. If one were to look at a picture of every military facility stationed around the world and at home, the disparity between similar styles and constructs would be evident. This variation on a singular theme is undoubtedly due to material resources available to the places where the facilities are located.

In comparing and contrasting each of the individual aspects of the DOTMLPF system of analysis, it is clear to understand the material domain having the greatest influence upon the other components. As in any system, its components require an ability to positively impact one another in order to fulfill its potential and contribute to its design. As in all cases, there are outliers and phenomenon, and perhaps material resources and their quality, and the accompanying acquisition of those materials, are not presently visible in any given analysis. For me, this is not acceptable, only because the material aspect has not yet been fully realized and explored by those doing the analysis. Tracing back any decision on doctrine, training or any of the other individual components, the material domain and its unique characteristics clearly provide the bounds and limitations for manifestations of these ideas and strategies. The aforementioned examples have demonstrated the importance of this aspect in its overall impact on national security and the future of the American way.


Fountain, D. (2007). Knowledge management in an information age army. Strategy Research Project, U.S. Army War College Carlisle Barracks, PA.

Kelly, R. (2004). Logistics modernization: a marine corps warfighting imperative. Marine Corps Gazzette, 20.

Kelly, T. (2003). Transformation and homeland security: dual challenges for the U.S. army. Parameters,36-50.

Tegnella,… [END OF PREVIEW]

System Analysis the Company Term Paper

Operating System Analysis Report: Microsoft Windows Server Term Paper

Work-Related Project Using Systems Analysis SDLC Term Paper

General Systems Theory and Modern Research Paper

Resolving the Challenges Facing Starbucks Using the Systems Theory Term Paper

View 1,000+ other related papers  >>

Cite This Essay:

APA Format

Dotmlpf System of Analysis.  (2011, March 16).  Retrieved September 20, 2019, from

MLA Format

"Dotmlpf System of Analysis."  16 March 2011.  Web.  20 September 2019. <>.

Chicago Format

"Dotmlpf System of Analysis."  March 16, 2011.  Accessed September 20, 2019.