E-Learning v. Traditional Learning for a Quantitative Research Paper

Pages: 2 (765 words)  ·  Bibliography Sources: 3  ·  File: .docx  ·  Level: Doctorate  ·  Topic: Teaching

e-Learning v. Traditional Learning

For a quantitative proposal you are planning, draw a visual model of the variables in the theory using the procedures for causal model design advanced in this chapter.

This study will attempt to focus on the preference of adult learners (i.e., e-learning vs. traditional learning). The variables in this study are gender, age, and socioeconomic status (SES) -- as well as variables such attitudes (e.g., racism), social control, political power, and/or leadership (Creswell). Creswell ( ) notes that in a "temporal order" of variables, one variable probably causes another. This study will survey 100 different students -- fifty men and fifty women -- of different ages and SES. The survey will ask questions regarding attitudes -- specifically related to race, social and political issues. The participants will be found through local community colleges and universities via a written letter and will then be contacted by e-mail or phone.

Locate qualitative journal articles that (a) use an a priori theory that is modified during the process of research, (b) generate or develop a theory at the end of the study, and (c) represent descriptive research without the use of an explicit theoretical model.

Ehlers, U.D. (2004). Quality in e-learning from a learner's perspective. Eden Research Workshop. Retrieved on September 13, 2010, from the Website:


Buy full Download Microsoft Word File paper
for $19.77
Ehler's (2004) article explains learners' preferences in e-learning based on empirical results of one of the largest surveys in this field. It can be reasoned that it is the quality of learning that decides which style (e-learning or traditional learning) is preferred and which style is more effective than the other. Like traditional learning where teaching styles and teachers vary significantly, the same is true in an e-learning environment. Elements such as curriculum and structure will make a big difference in the quality of the e-learning experience -- thus leading to a preference (or not).

Research Paper on E-Learning v. Traditional Learning for a Quantitative Assignment

Keller, C. (2004). Students' perceptions of e-learning in university education.

InformaWorld. Taylor & Francis Group. Retrieved on September 14, 2010,

from the Website:


Keller's (2004) article discusses students' perceptions of e-learning at Jonkoping University in Sweden. The students had two years experience in e-earning on the campus. The students took a survey with open-ended questions and then their results were analyses in a multiple regression analysis, putting the… [END OF PREVIEW] . . . READ MORE

Two Ordering Options:

Which Option Should I Choose?
1.  Buy full paper (2 pages)Download Microsoft Word File

Download the perfectly formatted MS Word file!

- or -

2.  Write a NEW paper for me!✍🏻

We'll follow your exact instructions!
Chat with the writer 24/7.

E-Learning Dissertation

Distance Learning an Evaluation of the Effectiveness and Student Progress in Florida Virtual School Dissertation

Measuring the Tangible Impacts of Merging E-Learning in IT Knowledge Management Research Proposal

Academic Reference Services Information Science Information Commons Research Proposal

Overarching Goal Essay

View 200+ other related papers  >>

How to Cite "E-Learning v. Traditional Learning for a Quantitative" Research Paper in a Bibliography:

APA Style

E-Learning v. Traditional Learning for a Quantitative.  (2010, September 15).  Retrieved August 12, 2020, from https://www.essaytown.com/subjects/paper/e-learning-traditional-quantitative/60928

MLA Format

"E-Learning v. Traditional Learning for a Quantitative."  15 September 2010.  Web.  12 August 2020. <https://www.essaytown.com/subjects/paper/e-learning-traditional-quantitative/60928>.

Chicago Style

"E-Learning v. Traditional Learning for a Quantitative."  Essaytown.com.  September 15, 2010.  Accessed August 12, 2020.