Research Paper: Edward Bond's Lear vs. Shakespeare's King

Pages: 15 (4882 words)  ·  Bibliography Sources: 1+  ·  Level: Doctorate  ·  Topic: Literature  ·  Buy This Paper


[. . .] Later, the daughters are able to come into power after overthrowing their father from his place of status. They throw him in jail and then prove him to be crazy. Insanity is validated by a would-be-trial as in the situation of the crazy King Lear in Act III of Shakespeare's drama. Like Shakespeare's Lear, Bond's Lear as well displays a lot of wisdom when he is being tried like a man that was crazy. The daughters who made a decision to turn against their father did not take long to do the same against their husbands in addition to against each other. Both start coming up with these methods of getting rid of their husbands and then wed Warrington who was Lear's assistant. Discovering that their plans do not work out as they thought, they take the next step and viciously get Warrington mutilated under their command. Fontanelle is considered to be lustfully happy and it is she who commands torture that is very bizarre to him. In the meantime Bodice just sits interweaving in a very composed mood.

Lear is able to get away from the prison by escaping. Even though his daughters' men are pursuing him, he is provided some shelter by the Gravedigger's Boy, a guileless type of person. Lear's existence brings forth tragedy to him as well. The daughters' military group has him killed and then has his pregnant wife, Cordelia raped. Lear is left by himself but no harm came his way. John, a township carpenter who happens to be in love with Cordelia, brings an attack against the military men, and the third stage of the play is centered on them. However, they downturn the daughters' control and put together a new government and once again Lear is put in a prison. Both Bodice and Fontanelle are executed on stage. Lear, on the other hand, is not slaughtered. In fact, he is blinded and therefore made politically incompetent. Lear is let go. Now that there is more sight he starts to "see" much more easily.

He is able to comprehend his mistake in building the wall. Likewise, he comes to the realization that it is he who is the main of the reason why his daughters' are so messed up.

Soon after Cordelia takes over with control, she goes back to working on the wall. Lear, who has now got a philosophical awareness, tries to counsel her against it. Lear preaches against having this new kind of government. After that is appears the he turns into this Christ-like type of person who makes conversation to the people through stories in regards to freedom. Cordelia commands him to stop infuriating people against her and to keep quiet. By the time it got to the end of the play, Lear is revealed endeavoring to pull down the wall utilizing a shovel. On the other hand, he is not permitted to achieve his assignment. He is shot to death by the son of a farmer who is now a soldier chosen by Cordelia to guarantee the smooth building of the wall. The same Lear who in the start got rid of a man for the building of the wall losses his own life in an effort to tear it down.

Marxism in Lear

As said by Marx there is a fit among social associations and style of production, but as the mode of production grows the old social associations come into inconsistency with the new economic authenticities and break down. New social transactions must be able to develop that match the needs of the new financial realism. However, the new economic order is what made new social connections extremely possible: One founded on contract and wages instead of fealty and acknowledgment. Bond and Shakespeare show this in the play because the play concerns itself with a large landholding noble whose loss of power is openly connected to a loss of land.

Governments into Power

New governments come finds its way into power announcing novel objectives. However the frames of domination stay the same. Generally speaking, what is being shown in Lear is a society that is obviously being trapped inside of a pattern that involves unnecessary aggression. In Bond's point-of-view, they alter the left walking boot for the right walking boot and in the end call it revolution.

Both plays, Lear and King Lear depict great vindictiveness and suffering. However, Shakespeare manages to show Lear's suffering by means of an extremely commanding language. When it comes differences, Bond openly envisages the physical suffering performed on the stage. For instance, Shakespeare's cracks of thunder turn out to be rifle shots and the natural storm is turned to current fighting. King Lear protests that his daughters have fashioned a "locomotive thrashing at my head" which tugs and distresses the mind. Bond is able to show some kind of an actual device of torture which can rip out the eyes and make the victim become blind. Also, King Lear shows an aspiration to "anatomize" the personality of Regan. Then after that Bond's Fontanelle actually goes through an autopsy.

Bond makes the assumption that his worry is for the society and not for the person. That is, he is in contradiction of the idea of tragedy which is concentrated on the dilemma of a single male leading role. He wants to portray the destiny of the common persons who are invalidated by the governing machinery. However, the post-war era was in need of a play which would show the disappointment of the age. With this goal in his mind Bond starts the play off by showing Lear in a view that is negative as a dictator that is not sensitive and also has no kind of support from his own kids. Bond himself makes the point that Act I of the play is conquered by a legend or myth. Now, the myth is the certainty of Lear that the building of the wall can be a safety measure for his kingdom. However in bringing his dream to life, Lear does not care for the adversities of his subjects. At this time, one feels that the emphasis of the drama is on the lot of the individuals and not on Lear. Nevertheless, as the play goes on, it takes a very dissimilar course which is against Bond's original purpose. The production appears to have gone out of his transforming goal. When the daughters turned on their father, our compassion is certainly with him and there straight on Bond's Lear bear a resemblance to Shakespeare's King Lear a lot. As Ruby Cohn has commented: "Bond achieves in retaining a definite Shakespearean consistency by including Shakespeare's grand metaphors and reconditioning numerous identifiably tragic themes and designs of descriptions ? insight and blindness, psychosis and saneness, suffering and negation most distinguished among them"

King Lear's foolish separation of his kingdom is substituted by Lear's similarly foolish wall-construction project. The wall acts as a dingy physical aide-memoire of the connections among ridiculous social injustice and public policy. Bond regains Shakespeare's animal images as well. In King Lear, the pictures of vultures, tigers, wolves, and serpents accentuate the abnormal evil of Regan and Goneril. Bond's Lear denotes to some of his characters in the play as sheep and cattle. After being thrown into jail by his daughters, he then breaks down and loses himself.

Christike Political Figure

When it got near the end Lear is shown to be this Christ-like figure who basically hands his life for the happiness of his people and he turns into this noble person through everything that he went through. Although there is an opposition towards him in the start, soon it turns to understanding and even understanding towards the end. It is obvious that he is considered to be this memorable over bearing character in the play. He does die but his death is considered to be a sacrifice. In advance of his death he makes an effort to make things right in the kingdom: he makes the effort to pull the wall all the way down. Bond makes the assumption that he has no purpose to bring about an Aristotelian purification. Nevertheless one may have grave suspicions about this claim. What a person sees is a protagonist transforming from blindness to light and a complete revelation of life.

One cannot disregard the cleansing effect of the play. In Bond's summaries for Lear one is able to observe some kind of a deep-felt admiration for King Lear alongside with a longing to put on the Lear story for our own times. For instance, both represent a father and king acting illogically and being faced by two daughters whose only worry is to take over the empire.

Governmental Autocratic Attitudes

Both Lears shows some kind of a transition from a tyrannical brashness into a state of folly, and near the end both obtain some type of… [END OF PREVIEW]

Four Different Ordering Options:

Which Option Should I Choose?

1.  Buy the full, 15-page paper:  $28.88


2.  Buy + remove from all search engines
(Google, Yahoo, Bing) for 30 days:  $38.88


3.  Access all 175,000+ papers:  $41.97/mo

(Already a member?  Click to download the paper!)


4.  Let us write a NEW paper for you!

Ask Us to Write a New Paper
Most popular!

King Lear and the Wife of Bath Essay

William Shakespeare's Macbeth Term Paper

King Arthur Is an Epic Hero Essay

King Lear Was Written Around 1605 Thesis

Shakespeare's Ghost as a Character in Shakespearean Adaptations 17th 18th Centuries Term Paper

View 1,000+ other related papers  >>

Cite This Research Paper:

APA Format

Edward Bond's Lear vs. Shakespeare's King.  (2014, March 4).  Retrieved June 25, 2019, from

MLA Format

"Edward Bond's Lear vs. Shakespeare's King."  4 March 2014.  Web.  25 June 2019. <>.

Chicago Format

"Edward Bond's Lear vs. Shakespeare's King."  March 4, 2014.  Accessed June 25, 2019.