Environmental Ethics Environmentalism vs. Animal Rights Term Paper

Pages: 4 (1302 words)  ·  Bibliography Sources: ≈ 3  ·  File: .docx  ·  Level: College Senior  ·  Topic: Animals

Environmental Ethics

Environmentalism vs. Animal Rights

The 1960s was a decade for the revolutionaries; drugs were considered therapeutic, revolting against the authorities and the governments was "in," and there was a need for a change in the principles of the cultures so that these new mannerisms could not only be justified in action but maintained and encouraged with the progress of time. Nestled deep in this decade was also the initiation and the root of the environmental movement. More specifically, it was in 1967 that the UCLA historian Lynn White Jr. had printed a document where he criticized the rigid Judeo-Christian traditions and blamed those traditions for the numerous environmental hazards that the world was facing at the time. He believed that to live in a peaceful and nurtured world, everyone needed to embrace the concealed and sequestered imminence of our traditions and oust the traditions that were prevalent at the time (White, 1967).Get full Download Microsoft Word File access
for only $8.97.

Term Paper on Environmental Ethics Environmentalism vs. Animal Rights the Assignment

Callicott soon after, in 1980, printed his document where he stated the probable and bound-to-spark-debates issue of the ethics behind the environmentalists and their movement. By this time, however, the Animal Rights advocates already had established views, in comparison, on various issues concerning the environment as well as the hazards of the decisions made keeping the "ethics" in mind views. Some of the pioneers of these views and outlooks were the following writings (some already in print and others on their way out): Peter Singer's "Animal Liberation and Stephen Clark's the Moral Status of Animals," Bernard Rollin's "Animal Rights and Human Morality," "Animals, Men and Morals edited by Stanley Godlovitch, Rosalind Godlovitch, and John Harris had been published in 1972, and Regan and Singer's first edition of the "Animal Rights and Human Obligations" had been published in 1976. By the end of 1980, authors like those mentioned above and Colin McGinn, Cora Diamond, Donald VanDeVeer, Joel Feinberg, Mary Midgley, Thomas Auxter and Timothy Sprigge had already laid down the basics and philosophies behind the animal rights and their violations. Callicott, in his document wanted to introduce a third player, "land ethic," into the game where decisions were made on the environment, and its effect on humans and animals were analyzed thereof; he wanted to dismiss what was believed to be humanitarian and moral when making these decisions and make the whole process a three-way story (Jamieson, 1997).

Callicott, in his essay highlights the similarities between the two apparently opposing groups: animal rights activist and environmental activists. The problem that Callicott pints out is the late reactions of the animal rights activists who at first approves the western environmental projects, then after they have been implemented they complain about the unfair and varying lack of attention paid to the non-human animals that exist in the same environment. However, they argue that the for majority of their academic years they have been taught within the customary setup of the Anglo-American philosophy while those that study to be environmentalists have been taught with an all round curriculum that includes the continental philosophers and/or theologians, so in essence, the dissimilarity between the two groups is not just philosophical, it as a result also is educational and communal (Jamieson, 1997).

The facts of the matter are this: there are some people who believe that environmental ethics and animal rights are two different and disjointed genres, there are still who believe that animal rights and the conservative or backward morals/principles have more in common then environmental ethics and animal right, it is also true, perhaps based on the most sound facts, that both the advocates of environmental health and animals rights have the exact identical foe, for example, an environmentalist and animal rights activist would both equally care about the hazardous effects of cutting down rainforests to evenly space the luxurious demand of lifestyles of the ever growing population, they would equally be concerned about the poisonous waste dumps in the oceans and… [END OF PREVIEW] . . . READ MORE

Two Ordering Options:

?
Which Option Should I Choose?
1.  Buy full paper (4 pages)Download Microsoft Word File

Download the perfectly formatted MS Word file!

- or -

2.  Write a NEW paper for me!✍🏻

We'll follow your exact instructions!
Chat with the writer 24/7.

Animal Rights Essay


Environmental Ethics Humans Term Paper


Animals and Society Essay


Animal Rights in the Debate Term Paper


Animal Rights Introduction Glance Term Paper


View 200+ other related papers  >>

How to Cite "Environmental Ethics Environmentalism vs. Animal Rights" Term Paper in a Bibliography:

APA Style

Environmental Ethics Environmentalism vs. Animal Rights.  (2007, February 18).  Retrieved January 28, 2021, from https://www.essaytown.com/subjects/paper/environmental-ethics-environmentalism/7897593

MLA Format

"Environmental Ethics Environmentalism vs. Animal Rights."  18 February 2007.  Web.  28 January 2021. <https://www.essaytown.com/subjects/paper/environmental-ethics-environmentalism/7897593>.

Chicago Style

"Environmental Ethics Environmentalism vs. Animal Rights."  Essaytown.com.  February 18, 2007.  Accessed January 28, 2021.
https://www.essaytown.com/subjects/paper/environmental-ethics-environmentalism/7897593.