Research Paper: Environmental Issues Faced in 21st

Pages: 62 (20526 words)  ·  Style: APA  ·  Bibliography Sources: 63  ·  Level: Master's  ·  Topic: Transportation  ·  Buy This Paper

SAMPLE EXCERPT:

[. . .] The main technique for controlling stormwater releases is the application of best administration practices (BMPs) that stop or diminish the release of contaminants into a water body (e.g., building of a stormwater holding pond to stop stormwater drainage straight into getting waters). best administration practices appropriate for one airport are not necessarily appropriate for another. Issues that may have some kind of an affect on permit supplies (i.e., suitable best administration practices), include the local climate (dry vs. rainy/wet, cold vs. warm); (Suzanne & Fallacaro, 2011).

the size or type of neighboring water bodies -- contaminants are weak depending on the size of the water body getting the release (a stream or creek vs. A river or ocean);

the water excellence of neighboring water bodies -- local authorizing authorities reflect existing contaminant levels when controlling airport releases; and ! airport size.

Deicing and Anti-icing Activities

With regard to water quality compliance matters, the management of anti-icing and deicing chemicals has been posing the greatest challenge to many airport operators. The deicing and anti-icing of aircraft and airfield surfaces is required by the Federal Aviation Airlines to make sure the safety of passengers. On the other hand, when performed without release controls in place, airport deicing procedures can result in environmental influences (Suzanne & Fallacaro, 2011). Research shows that the discharges that are coming from deicing operations are the ones that have the potential to cause things such as algae blooms, fish kills, and pollution to come up or ground waters. Furthermore to potential water life and human health influences from the poisonousness of anti-icing and deicing a chemicals, the ethylene glycol or biodegradation of propylene glycol in surface waters can greatly impact water quality, together with important reduction in dissolved oxygen levels (Woodcock & Roberts, 2007).

Studies have likewise exposed toxicological effects of deicer answers that are not able to be credited to either ethylene glycol or propylene glycol (Westermark, 2001). This has led to concern that these effects are attributable to unknown, proprietary additives. (Suzanne & Fallacaro, 2011). The environmental impact and route of these additives is not yet assumed. Classically, airlines are accountable for aircraft deicing and anti-icing processes, and airports are accountable for the deicing and anti-icing of airstrip roadway. The airfield is eventually accountable for managing the resulting wastewater. This accountability is classically drawn into the airport's stormwater authority (Wayson & Iovinelli, 2009).

As talked about above, significant differences which happened to exist among airport NPDES permits. For instance, a local authorizing authority can possibly execute exact requirements, for example restrictions as to where deicing processes could take place, an obligation to utilization deicing collection units to vacuum deicing liquid previous to arriving the storm water system, or supplies to use checking equipment to make sure compliance with the permit. Other permits could possibly permit the airport to release deicing fluids straight into an neighboring water body (Woodcock & Roberts, 2007).

As stated by the Environmental Protection Agency, the disparity in airport permitting requirements has led the agency to contemplate applying national standards in the form of effluent limitation guidelines (ELGs) for airport deicing and anti-icing operations (Westermark, 2001).20 effluent restraint strategies are national guidelines for adjusting wastewater discharges to surface waters. effluent limitation guidelines are technology-based and specific to an industry. effluent limitation guidelines applicable to airport deicing would be intended to deliver unchanging guidance for NPDES permit writers all over the country, in that way starting a baseline standard for all airports. (Wayson & Iovinelli, 2009). In 2004, the Environmental Protection Agency began to progress effluent limitation guidelines for airport deicing processes.

Research has been showing that the initial estimates that are coming from the Environmental Protection Agency are showing that treatment technology and contamination prevention practices could possibly decrease deicing releases from the current level of 25 million gallons a year to 6 million gallons a year (Suzanne & Fallacaro, 2011). As stated before, numerous airports have strict permit supplies that stipulate the management of deicing chemicals. Others do have some kind of few controls. Those with few controls could be obligatory to make capital developments in order to obey with new permitting requirements. At this stage, most of the cost estimates for the aviation industry as an entire are not obtainable.

The Environmental Protection Agency is presently gathering survey data from airports and air carriers and directing thorough sampling programs. The present work will be utilized to classify the best obtainable technology that is frugally attainable for treatment and release of spent deicing liquids. The Environmental Protection Agency presently plans to print a projected rule in December 2007 and to take concluding achievement by September 2009 (Westermark, 2001).

Fuel Storage

For the reason that airports need to store fuel onsite to refill aircraft and airport ground facility equipment, most airports are obligatory to create some type of a Spill Prevention, Control, and Countermeasure (SPCC) plan (Wayson & Iovinelli, 2009) All of these necessities are intended to make sure that facilities that store oil are making plans for and actually taken measures to avert environmental injury that is ensuing from oil spills. An Spill Prevention, Control, and Countermeasure plan is required to include the following:

operating procedures that are intended to stop all oil spills, for example procedures to examine tanks and related with piping for leaks;

control measures which are installed in order to avert a spill from reaching navigable waters, for instance the construction of a dike, repression curb, or pit around a tank or tank farm; (Westermark, 2001).

As talked from above, one of the main control measures necessary under the Spill Prevention, Control, and Countermeasure requirements is the utilization of a secondary containment system for oil storage containers. For instance system must be big enough to briefly hold the whole fillings of the major oil tank in the oil storing place, in the event of a breach in the system. (Wayson & Iovinelli, 2009) For instance, if a tank farm was able to have four 14,000-gallon tanks and two 7,000-gallon tanks, and that happened to be the storage location for 10 mobile refilling trucks that have 500-gallon tanks, the tank farm would be obligatory to have secondary repression adequate to hold the fillings of the largest tank -- 16,000 gallons (Wayson & Iovinelli, 2009).

When the Environmental Protection Agency proposed new Spill Prevention, Control, and Countermeasure necessities in 2002, airport operators and the Environmental Protection Agency disagreed about the secondary restraint necessities appropriate to mobile airport refilling trucks. (Westermark, 2001). In particular, airport operators argued that it was impractical to require mobile refuelers to offer secondary control equal to the size of the tank for the reason that, throughout refueling operations, they would be anticipated to move to numerous parts of the landing field that could not be tailored with secondary control systems.

Reducing

Reducing important aviation environmental influences in absolute terms is a thought-provoking goal, particularly when measured in light of the expected growth in aviation traffic. Despite the fact in some areas absolute reductions are already being achieved (e.g., the reduction in the amount of individuals bare to important heights of aircraft noise), these decreases will be hard to withstand as traffic cultivates. Further, there are parts (for instance NOx emissions) where operational procedures and technological improvements combined have not been enough to counterbalance the upsurge in emissions which are connected with growth of the traffic. Therefore, the vision statement is aspiring. To attain the vision, instant and continued public and private promise to investment, research, communication, reaction and learning at regional local, national and international levels is essential. Such action will be able to provide both long-term and short-term benefits. During the course of the process of realizing this vision, there must be cautious attention to nurturing distributed leadership, accountability and burdens among all shareholders. There is a plan of action essential in making sure that this vision is being brought into reality is the central thrust of this whole project. Development of the Next Generation Air Transportation System (NGATS) is what provides the chance to be able to apply the recommendations which will also be presented in this project.

Inside the United States there are so many different groups and organizations (state, federal, state, local, aerospace industry, and community groups) whose main emphasis is aviation noise and assignments. Those that are participating in resolving the issues are really dedicated to their charge and, when centered on the problem, can be very influential when it comes to bringing about change. Nevertheless, in general, the activities of these institutions are not considered to be well coordinated, and acting individually they are not probable to change our national path in a manner that is substantive. In order to become more effective, establishments will need to be able to coordinate their activities much better. The expansion of a new paradigm for organizational coordination and interaction at the national level arose from the study as one of the most significant chances for refining the nation's competence… [END OF PREVIEW]

Four Different Ordering Options:

?
Which Option Should I Choose?

1.  Buy the full, 62-page paper:  $26.88

or

2.  Buy & remove for 30 days:  $38.47

or

3.  Access all 175,000+ papers:  $41.97/mo

(Already a member?  Click to download the paper!)

or

4.  Let us write a NEW paper for you!

Ask Us to Write a New Paper
Most popular!

Corporate Environmental Responsibility in the 21st Century Thesis


Environmental Sustainability Has Been Increasingly Embraced Dissertation


Globalization Reaction Paper


Organizational Theory Info Term Paper


Ethical Issue With Nanomedicine Term Paper


View 342 other related papers  >>

Cite This Research Paper:

APA Format

Environmental Issues Faced in 21st.  (2013, August 1).  Retrieved April 23, 2019, from https://www.essaytown.com/subjects/paper/environmental-issues-faced-21st/5147861

MLA Format

"Environmental Issues Faced in 21st."  1 August 2013.  Web.  23 April 2019. <https://www.essaytown.com/subjects/paper/environmental-issues-faced-21st/5147861>.

Chicago Format

"Environmental Issues Faced in 21st."  Essaytown.com.  August 1, 2013.  Accessed April 23, 2019.
https://www.essaytown.com/subjects/paper/environmental-issues-faced-21st/5147861.