Term Paper: Ethics in Group Counselling

Pages: 15 (4405 words)  ·  Style: APA  ·  Bibliography Sources: 10  ·  Level: Master's  ·  Topic: Business - Ethics  ·  Buy This Paper


[. . .] Given that the discussion regarding whether or not morality has been about facts, individual therapy views or group therapy perceptions has raged for such a long time, we are not going to engage in this paper. It has been essential; nevertheless, to understand that there have been these types of fundamentally distinct perspectives concerning the nature associated with morality contributing to whether or not, whenever therapists make ethical decisions, they have been determining moral facts or perhaps have been articulating views - either personal or perhaps those in the groups' traditions (Barnes and Murdin, 2001).

Ethics: targeting appropriate results or fulfilling tasks

There have been two additional fundamentally distinct perspectives concerning the nature associated with ethics in both individual and group therapy sessions. One - the consequentialist perspective - tends to be that ethics has been focused on causing the very best effects. In its least complicated form, this particular perspective has been that our ethical duty has been to try and do what brings the best advantages towards everyone. Therefore if everyone is probably going to become happier when we tell a lie instead of telling the facts, we all ought to convey the lie (Barnes and Murdin, 2001).

Based on this particular perspective, actions like telling a lie or ignoring promises have not been fundamentally poor, nor have been measures like being truthful as well as maintaining promises fundamentally great. All measures have been ethically impartial, and whether or not these people have been correct or perhaps incorrect in specific situations depends upon whether or not these people bring about the very best effects. The end eventually justifies the methods, as well as because lying has not been fundamentally negative, we have now absolutely no liability to stop doing this (Barnes and Murdin, 2001).

Simply because the actual consequentialist viewpoint sees benefit within ends instead of measures, it has been frequently termed as the teleological look at ethics, telos becoming the Greek for 'end' or perhaps 'objective'. Individuals who maintain this perspective base their own ethical decisions around the theory of utility (Barnes and Murdin, 2001). This theory of utility is most exercised within the group therapy session by the therapists when they tell an objective lie to primarily coax or encourage the group members towards the right path. The therapists rarely ever choose to exercise the theory of utility as there is rarely ever a need to sugar coat anything for motivation.

Another look at ethics has been the dutiful or perhaps deontological perspective -- 'deon' actually being Greek for 'duty'. In accordance with this, particular kinds of measures have been fundamentally great, and some others fundamentally negative. Our ethical responsibilities are made up in undertaking the very first as well as staying away from the latter. Those things thought to be fundamentally great differ, however usually consist of improving independence, being truthful, trying to keep pledges and remaining judicious. All those thought to be fundamentally bad generally consist of killing someone and causing damage (Barnes and Murdin, 2001).

Not every therapist retains both a teleological or even deontological perspective in the group or therapy session. Some - known as ethical pluralists -- hold both equally, contemplating that ethical judgements demand all of us to keep in mind the requirements associated with every viewpoint. Therefore if maintaining a pledge might damage other people, when choosing what to do they might consider the ethical significance associated with maintaining it contrary to the significance of not hurting other people (Barnes and Murdin, 2001).

Teleological, deontological as well as ethical pluralist perspectives have been suitable for both the actual 'fact/truth' as well as 'opinion' perspectives of morality in individual sessions hence we see a higher preference of individual therapy sessions by therapists who belong to the pluralist school of thought. A therapist might consider it as being a fact that ethics within a group therapy session has been focused on effects or perhaps that it has been focused on remaining dutiful or perhaps that it has been focused on both equally. Other therapists might consider it as being a case of viewpoint that it has been focused on one or another or even both equally in individual therapy sessions (Barnes and Murdin, 2001).

Best Practice within Planning

A.1. Expert Context as well as Regulatory Specifications

Group Therapists make an effort to understand, realize as well as use the ACA Code of Ethics (1995), the ASGW Professional Standards with regard to the Coaching of these Group therapists, these specific ASGW Best Practice Recommendations, the ASGW diverseness capabilities, and also the AMCD Multicultural Counselling Capabilities along with Requirements. The individual sessions' therapists focus on studying the appropriate state laws and regulations, certification specifications, appropriate National Board for Licensed Counsellors Codes along with Requirements, their institution's requirements, and insurance coverage specifications influencing the procedures associated with therapy work (Thomas and Pender, 2008).

A.2. Scope of Group and Individual Therapy together with Conceptual Framework

Group Therapists determine the scope associated with their practice linked to the central as well as specialization capabilities described within the ASGW Training Requirements. Group Therapists have been mindful of individual weaknesses and strengths in major groups. Group Therapists create and have been in a position to enunciate a standard conceptual framework to steer practice along with a reason for usage of methods that have been employed. Group Therapists restrict their process to all those aspects wherein they satisfy the training requirements set up by ASGW Training Requirements (Thomas and Pender, 2008). Individual therapists are mindful of the certification processes and the institutions' requirements to attain the necessary conceptual framework for practicing an insured and safe therapy custom.

A.3. Evaluation

a. Evaluation of self. Group and Individual Therapists both make an effort to evaluate their skills and knowledge associated towards the specific group(s) available. Group Therapists evaluate their morals, beliefs as well as theoretical alignment and just how these influence on the group, especially when operating with a diverse as well as multicultural populace (Thomas and Pender, 2008). Individual therapists on the other hand study the morals, beliefs as well as theoretical alignment of their clients to understand how these aspects have influenced the individual and their present nature.

b. Ecological evaluation. Group Therapists evaluate local community requirements, agency or even institution assets, sponsoring institution vision, employees proficiency, perceptions concerning group therapy, certified coaching degrees of prospective group leaders relating to group therapy; client perceptions concerning group therapy, along with multicultural as well as diversity factors. Group Therapists make use of this data as being the foundation for developing judgements associated with their group process, or to the application of groups wherein they've supervisory, assessment, or oversight duties (Thomas and Pender, 2008). Individual therapists merely restrict their ecological evaluation to the social gathering and structure of their clients.

A.4. Program Development as well as Evaluation for group therapists

a. Group Therapists find out the kind(s) of group(s) to generally be offered and the way they connect with local community requirements.

b. Group Therapists briefly express on paper the objective and aims related to the group. Group Therapists additionally find out the function related to the group members in affecting or identifying the group objectives.

c. Group Therapists set charges in conjunction with the organization's fee plan, bearing in mind the monetary condition and vicinity of potential group participants.

d. Group Therapists select methods along with a leadership model suitable towards the kind(s) of group(s) being provided.

e. Group Therapists have an assessment strategy in line with regulation, enterprise and insurance coverage specifications, where acceptable.

f. Group Therapists take into account existing professional recommendations when utilizing technologies, which includes although not confined to online interaction (Thomas and Pender, 2008).

A.5. Resources

Group Therapists synchronize sources linked to the type of group(s) along with group activities to be offered, like: sufficient financing; the suitability and accessibility to a qualified co-leader; space as well as privacy specifications for the kind(s) of group(s) being provided; advertising and enrolling; and suitable cooperation along with other community agencies as well as institutions (Thomas and Pender, 2008). Individual therapists

A.6. Professional Statement of disclosure

Group and Individual Therapists sustain awareness as well as sensitivity concerning cultural specification of confidentiality and also privacy. Group Therapists especially value differing perspectives regarding disclosure of real information. Both group and individual therapists have a reliable statement of disclosure that features information about confidentiality and also exceptions to discretion, theoretical alignment, information about the character, objective(s) along with targets related to the group or individual session, the therapy services that may be offered, the function as well as duty of group members and also leaders as well as the individual therapist, Group and Individual Therapists credentials to undertake the particular group(s), distinct permits, accreditations along with qualified affiliations, and location of accreditation=credentialing program (Thomas and Pender, 2008).

A.7. Group and Member Planning

a. Group Therapists filter potential group members in case they are suitable towards the kind of group… [END OF PREVIEW]

Four Different Ordering Options:

Which Option Should I Choose?

1.  Buy the full, 15-page paper:  $28.88


2.  Buy + remove from all search engines
(Google, Yahoo, Bing) for 30 days:  $38.88


3.  Access all 175,000+ papers:  $41.97/mo

(Already a member?  Click to download the paper!)


4.  Let us write a NEW paper for you!

Ask Us to Write a New Paper
Most popular!

Group Counseling Term Paper

Group Dynamics Ethics in Counseling an Analysis Research Proposal

Ethics and Counseling and Ethics Counselors Term Paper

Counselors Need to Study Ethics Questionnaire

Creating a Proposal for a Counseling Group Research Paper

View 361 other related papers  >>

Cite This Term Paper:

APA Format

Ethics in Group Counselling.  (2012, December 15).  Retrieved June 15, 2019, from https://www.essaytown.com/subjects/paper/ethics-group-counselling/3612413

MLA Format

"Ethics in Group Counselling."  15 December 2012.  Web.  15 June 2019. <https://www.essaytown.com/subjects/paper/ethics-group-counselling/3612413>.

Chicago Format

"Ethics in Group Counselling."  Essaytown.com.  December 15, 2012.  Accessed June 15, 2019.