Home  >  Subjects  >  Management / Organizations  >  current page My Profile

Evaluating and Compensating Employees in a Global Business EnvironmentEssay

Pages: 9 (3194 words)  |  Style: Harvard  |  Sources: 17

Custom Writing

Performance Management and Rewards in IHRM

IHRM has been an issue of great concern many managers serving in multinational enterprises. This paper presents distinct approaches used in managing, recruiting, evaluating, and rewarding employees by companies operating in the global business environment. Most companies have established alternate points of sale in different countries. Further, the paper turns the audience's attention towards basic functions for international human resource management including selection and of recruitment new employees, employee training and development, work efficiency assessment, and employee remuneration.

The elements of femininity vs. masculinity and high vs. low avoidance of uncertainty are substantive elements in the decision-making process. For instance, Swedish employees score high within their femininity sides and, for this reason, have a high desire for non-financial rewards including interpersonal relations, time off, and autonomy. On the contrary, nations such as the U.S. scores higher on masculinity scales place a higher value reference to financial status, incentives, and the extent of job challenge (Zheng, 2013). Reward systems are carefully tailored to address development, equity, as well as cross-cultural elements of the MNC. The needs are discussed in detail in subsequent sections in meeting career needs for expatriates as well as other host country nationals.

IHRM practices support the principles of inclusiveness and rewarding based on employee participation levels. The implication is that it promotes democratic governance across the organization (Zheng, 2013). Complex international firms cultivate increment of returns through creation of positive reinforcement. MNEs develop informal databases for employee recognition as a way of supporting the principle. Each employee is granted access to the databases to support spontaneous and informal recognition at all organizational levels. The goal of growing by chunking allows MNEs to promote local innovation through build learning capacity across immediate organizations.

The decentralized organization structures focus on information sharing even though firms create electronic forums for knowledge-sharing while promoting learning. The employees document the solutions and ideas to problems in the databases while eliminating redundancy. MNEs embrace experimentation and debate in line with maximizing the fringes. IHRM practices support the principle through including training processes for employees and determination of risk-taking for process orientation and knowledge marketplaces creation. The employees have a visual display of the innovative solutions to immediate problems. Managers consider the designs of monetary bonus systems as rewards of cost saving and innovative projects (Cooke, 2012).

Like other organizational functions, the performance evaluation approach depends on the HRM strategy adopted by the organization. Companies with ethnocentric approaches are likely to utilize performance evaluation process like those used by the subsidiaries' headquarters. Various companies establish translation and evaluation forms within the local languages in which others formulate original language. Companies using polycentric approaches develop local procedures in all respective countries. Finally, companies that have geocentric approaches utilize similar performance evaluation systems across the world. However, there is a universal applicability (Van Vuuren, de Jong & Seydel, 2008). The development of global systems can be most challenging. Issues of remuneration coupled with benefits have a close link to the local labor market conditions especially where organizations take geocentric or ethnocentric decisions.

Availability of more qualified local people aimed at filling the positions at prevailing wage rates is reputed to the application of expatriates as well as local laws interacting to develop remuneration and benefits levels (Goldstein, 2009). For instance, in case there are applicants availed for the positions, remuneration for such positions will increase. The focus, of reducing expenses, leads to international human resources managers considering bringing in expatriates (Mamman, Baydoun & Adeoye, 2009). Companies usually develop policies that have global application in offering salaries and benefits that represent specific market levels. For instance, large successful multinational companies emphasizing on quality of products and employees have differential global policies in paying highest wages in its operating points. The other companies offering top salaries within the country make measures through research and development. However, they pay average wages as per the country of manufacturing. The development of international systems for benefits and compensation, organizations have certain primary concerns (Gu, 2009).

The initial element is that of comparability. Good compensation systems assign salaries to various employees through internally competitive and comparable market standards. For instance, salaries of senior managers are usually higher in comparison to those offered by supervisors. The positions are liable for receiving higher amounts in local market range. International organizations should consider salaries of people transferring from other geographical locations (Cooke, 2012). The other major issue is cost where organizations focus on minimizing expenses and developing payroll systems that have a large capacity. Labor relations operate on functionalities that identify and define roles for workers and management within the workplace. The labor relations concept varies with great liability based on different global regions. For the U.S., labor relations are inclined towards formal relationships that are antagonistic, between management and labor as established in the union contracts (Service & Loudon, 2010).

In Japan, relationships between unions and management are rather cooperative, and management appoints the union leaders. In many nations, governments regulate all labor relations practices. In the end, the function triumphs other human resources management approach where organizations have to focus on polycentric concepts. In the end, the labor relations focus on a local level issues that are good corporate strategies in coordinating labor relations policies for their across subsidiaries. MNEs utilize heuristics in creating performance evaluation parameters (Mamman, Baydoun & Adeoye, 2009).

The management uses corresponding HR principles for purposes of supporting the heuristics. The MNEs' IHRM practices will result from such guiding principles. The scope is based on organizations' use of cross-functional models in its IHRM practices. The implication is a translation of flexibility and diversity recruiting objectives for purposes of rewarding employees of cross-functional experience. The focus creates career maps to be used by employees while including assignments on cross-functional work. The MNEs decentralize with the aim of developing closer relationships with immediate consumers within their local levels while promoting control from the bottom towards the top. MNEs foster improved information communication channels using organizational structures.

International HRM practices differ from the domestic HRM techniques in various ways. A critical influence is that the focus of IHRM involves management of complexities of operations within employment of people from various countries and cultures. Major reasons for international venture failure are based on lack of understanding about differences among management of employees and the domestic environments. Management styles are successful in establishing domestic environments through application of foreign environments without having appropriate modifications. Reasons for the complexity of IHRM include dependency on the strategy descriptors (Schuler, Budhwar & Florkowski, 2012).

International HRM focuses on the broader scope of activities as compared to domestic HRM. The elements in line include international taxation, international relocation, coordination of exchange rates and foreign currencies, and international orientation for the abroad employee postings.

The human resource managers focus on international environment facing problems of establishing HR issues for employees who belong to diverse nationalities (Fenton-O'Creevy, Gooderham, & Nordhaug, 2012). The HR managers require focus in setting up differential HRM systems within respective locations. The human resource managers within domestic environments administer immediate HR programs to the employees who belong to a single nationality. Appraisal systems have critical roles in the determination of compensation in countries such as the U.S. The international firms focus on ensuring that performance links to the corporate strategy while making the employees responsive to appropriate reward levels. Intricate and complicated financial compensation packages presented to expatriates are developed within the financial provisions of many MNCs. The formulas go beyond the focus of the human resource schemes. In such case, the extensive discussion involves compensation over time and the way different features and problems relate to contingency models.

International HRM calls for increased involvement within the employees' personal life. The MNCs' HR managers are focused on ensuring that executives are posted to foreign countries with an understanding of all compensation package aspects provided for a foreign assignment. The elements to be highlighted include cost of taxes, and living (Zhang & Edwards, 2009). HR managers assess the employee's family readiness to relocate while supporting such families adjusts to foreign cultures based on cross-cultural training. The instruments of admission include HR strategy to take responsibility for persons left behind in schools in home country. Employees on foreign assignments require closer attention and nurturing (Cooke, 2011). The domestic environments enhance the involvement of HR managers and departments where an employee's families are limited to the benefits of family insurance programs and transport facilities like domestic transfers.

The heightened exposure to foreign risks within international assignments includes the safety and health of an employee and immediate family. Other aspects of risks relevant to the issue of IHRM today include terrorism (Warner, 2010). Various MNCs are considering the factor in deciding on any international assignment for employees. Financial and human consequences of IHRM mistakes are more severe as compared to domestic business. For instance, in case executives are posted abroad prematurely, it may result in high direct and indirect costs (Cooke, 2009).

International HRM… [END OF PREVIEW]

Download Full Paper (9 pages; perfectly formatted; Microsoft Word file) Microsoft Word File

Global Human Resources Management


Global Market Research- Roles and Challenges Global


Evaluating and Explaining Organizational Accountability in Emergency Management of Typhoon Morakot a Citizens Perspective


Elements Which Has Effect on Efficiency of the Workers


Florida Company Fastens Its Sights on Global Growth


View 134 other related papers  >>

Cite This Paper:

APA Format

Evaluating And Compensating Employees In A Global Business Environment.  (2015, January 30).  Retrieved November 24, 2017, from https://www.essaytown.com/subjects/paper/evaluating-compensating-employees-global/8457119

MLA Format

"Evaluating And Compensating Employees In A Global Business Environment."  30 January 2015.  Web.  24 November 2017. <https://www.essaytown.com/subjects/paper/evaluating-compensating-employees-global/8457119>.

Chicago Format

"Evaluating And Compensating Employees In A Global Business Environment."  Essaytown.com.  January 30, 2015.  Accessed November 24, 2017.
https://www.essaytown.com/subjects/paper/evaluating-compensating-employees-global/8457119.

Disclaimer