Term Paper: First Amendment in 1787

Pages: 5 (1484 words)  ·  Bibliography Sources: 4  ·  Level: Master's  ·  Topic: American History  ·  Buy This Paper

SAMPLE EXCERPT:

[. . .] He said that all of the charges that were against him were not right because the First Amendment's promises that "Congress shall make no law interfering with the freedom of speech." (Engelken, 2011)

After the trial had gone through the federal courts, in the end, the case was judged by the Supreme Court sometime in the year of 1919 (The 5 First Amendment Freedoms, 2010). The Supreme Court supported Schenck's opinion, saying that the charge did not disrupt his First Amendment privilege to free speech even though the judge did say that in numerous locations and in times that were ordinary. It appears that Mr. Schenck would have had a privilege to talk about anything mention in his leaflets. However, the judge talked about how far an individual freedom of speech ranges but of course that depends a lot on the circumstances. The judge supposed that throughout a war the government has the power to stop obstacles to recruitment. As a result, the government furthermore has the power to punish a person if they are using words that are verified to cause such trouble.

How a free speech is different for individuals and for corporations

Virtually every well-educated American recognizes that in 2009, the United States Supreme Court made the point that corporations will have to be provided the similar free-speech rights which are up under the Constitution as regular Americans to fund advertising that advocates the election or defeat of political applicants (Magarian, 2012). On the other hand, when it comes to differences, there is a huge argument where some say that there is no difference and that corporations and individuals have the same exact rights, however there are many citizens that argue against that proclaiming that is not true.

Those that do say there is a difference believes that the corporations are really a good representative of various individuals, and as each individual is a person one company will not be able to support all the opinions of its entire employee's. An individual needs to be made secure by something when they are not able to keep themselves protected where corporations by now possess enough protections that they do not need the adding of free speech (Engelken, 2011).

Other research shows that just because something is "made of people" does not mean it needs to get the exact same protections as individuals. Corporations usually have much better protections through financial means than those that are individuals -- very much like the government (Magarian, 2012). It is for this very purpose that the constitution provided peoples these kinds of protections. Then, once corporations start feeling like individuals, be exploited like persons, and are able to feel joy and suffer like actual humans, then they will then be able to have the same rights.

Next, there are those citizens that confused as to why corporations would not have the similar rights as those that are individuals. Experts argue that a corporation includes many individuals so one think that businesses would have those same kind of rights but appears they may not be true.

Conclusion

In conclusion, the first amendment gives United States citizens the freedom of free exchange of thoughts and ideas whether it wrong or right so that we can choose on how our society is being operated and who will speak on behalf of us in the government. If people do not have this liberty to exchange their ideas, they can never sort out the truth for themselves; we cannot differ on ideas that are bad or promote ones that are good. Furthermore, a free press must be present in order to challenge the government's policies and practices. People should be able to fulfill our religions as stated by their own sense of wrong and right, and to tell the government what they think of their opinions. The bottom line is that the first amendment has many avenues of protection and that theses protections fall in many different sections such as speech press religion petition and assembly, all of which are very important in a person's rights.

References:

The 5 First Amendment Freedoms. (2010, March 7). Retrieved from Freedom of Information: http://www.illinoisfirstamendmentcenter.com/freedoms.php

Engelken, S.J. (2011). MAJORITARIAN DEMOCRACY IN A FEDERALIST SYSTEM: THE LATE CHIEF JUSTICE REHNQUIST AND THE FIRST AMENDMENT. Harvard Journal of Law and Public Policy,, 45(8), 695-726.

Magarian, G.P. (2012). Speaking truth to firepower: How the first amendment destabilizes the second. Texas Law Review, 91(1), 49-99.… [END OF PREVIEW]

Four Different Ordering Options:

?
Which Option Should I Choose?

1.  Buy the full, 5-page paper:  $26.88

or

2.  Buy & remove for 30 days:  $38.47

or

3.  Access all 175,000+ papers:  $41.97/mo

(Already a member?  Click to download the paper!)

or

4.  Let us write a NEW paper for you!

Ask Us to Write a New Paper
Most popular!

First Amendment the Founding Research Paper


Summer of 1787 Term Paper


Punishment Then Now and What's Equity Got to Do With it Amendment Term Paper


Federal Government Pass a Constitutional Amendment Banning Term Paper


Right to Bear Arms Thesis


View 85 other related papers  >>

Cite This Term Paper:

APA Format

First Amendment in 1787.  (2013, September 26).  Retrieved April 25, 2019, from https://www.essaytown.com/subjects/paper/first-amendment-1787/5597161

MLA Format

"First Amendment in 1787."  26 September 2013.  Web.  25 April 2019. <https://www.essaytown.com/subjects/paper/first-amendment-1787/5597161>.

Chicago Format

"First Amendment in 1787."  Essaytown.com.  September 26, 2013.  Accessed April 25, 2019.
https://www.essaytown.com/subjects/paper/first-amendment-1787/5597161.