Frequency Allocation Research Paper

Pages: 8 (2227 words)  ·  Bibliography Sources: 8  ·  File: .docx  ·  Level: College Senior  ·  Topic: Film

Frequency Allocation

Reaching the Masses: Frequency Allocation and the FCC's Simultaneous Ascending Auctions

Introduction and Interpretation

In order to understand exactly what is meant by "frequency allocation," a basic understanding of the physics of broadcasting is necessary. Electromagnetic waves exist all around us, and are created by a variety of different sources -- from the Sun to a microwave to the radio transmitter of your local college radio station. These waves are all essentially the same "thing" (or the same energy, perhaps; a discussion of the wave vs. particle aspect of electromagnetic waves is beyond the scope of this paper and is also beside the main point), but they have different wavelengths, which cause them to behave in very different ways. A wavelength is defined as the distance between two crests (or two troughs) of the same wave, and radio waves have some of the longer wavelengths of the non-visible electromagnetic spectrum (NASA 2010). Because all electromagnetic waves travel at the same speed in a vacuum, changing the wavelength also changes the frequency of the wave (the number of crests/troughs that pass in a given period of time), and these different frequencies can be picked up individual by fine-tuning receivers. "Frequency allocation" refers to the classification and licensing of different frequencies by governments for use in communications and transmitting information to avoid several entities attempting to use the same frequency (FCC 2010).Get full Download Microsoft Word File access
for only $8.97.

Research Paper on Frequency Allocation Assignment

Countries are in need of frequency allocation systems and processes to ensure that communications and scientific research can continue unimpeded, aiding in commerce and discovery as well as scientific development, entertainment, and simple communications between various individuals/entities. An examination of the United States' frequency allocation table shows the wide variety of uses that exist for radio waves and the many different allocations that have been made in this country in regards to allocation, detailing the complexity of the situation and thus highlighting the need for an organizing body to allocate and regulate the use of these frequencies (NTIA 2010). Without such systems in place, communications would essentially become impossible as different transmissions would be competing for the same frequency, making the receiving of a clear, single signal all but impossible. A simple way to picture this is just recall a time in which your car radio appeared to be trying to decide between two different channels -- in areas where coverage maps overlap slightly, to radio station might be broadcasting at the same (or very similar) frequencies, and the receiver in your car is unable to produce a clear sound from either station -- it is picking up both signals. Frequency allocation eliminates this occurrence in most instances (FCC 2010a).

History and Context

In the very early days of radio transmission, there was no real need for frequency allocation as there were few receivers set up and even fewer transmitters, especially of any power; if there is no overlap in the coverage area of two or more given radio signals, then an overlap in frequencies does not matter -- geographic distance will eliminate any possible confusion on the receiving end (FCC 2010a; Huurdeman 2003). Radio spread quite quickly, however, and the need for frequency allocation by national governments and eventually international bodies quickly became apparent, leading to the development of agencies for this purpose (Huurdeman 2003).

As uses for radio waves continued to grow, the need for frequency allocation also became more pressing and more complex. Radios are not the only devices that make use of radio waves; radio telescopes are advanced pieces of technological equipment used to study the vast reaches of deep space, and frequency allocation ensures that these devices will not be bombarded with communications signals in their efforts (NTIA 2010). There are also a variety of other more common and familiar devices that are utilized by billions of individuals on a daily basis that require the use of radio waves -- televisions, cell phones, wireless Internet connections, and pretty much any device that sends and/or receives information of any sort without the use of direct connections works via the broadcast of radio waves (electromagnetic waves of specific frequencies are also used in hardwired communication devices, but as they are not broadcast through the open air they are not an issue here (FCC 2010a; Withers 1993).


Early on in the 1920s and 30s, when television was just being developed and causing serious competition for radio frequency rights for the first time, the relatively new Federal Communications Commission and Congress allocated frequencies based on current technological capabilities and patent holdings for the few working television transmission devices (Kittross and Sterling 1979). RCA was a major player in these actions as it held a near-monopoly of television broadcasting and receiving technologies through various acquisitions and partnerships (Kittross & Sterling 1979). Neither this monopoly nor this system would hold, however.

Not only did television manufacturers and broadcasters increase and grow exponentially in the years following World War II, but modern devices and improved broadcast strengths covering wider geographic areas have also hugely increased the need for more precise and more variegated frequency allocations (NTIA 2010; Withers 1993). For this reason, more frequent and more complex as well as more comprehensive methods have been developed to assist the frequency allocation procedure in countries around the globe including the United States (FCC 2010a; Withers 1999). The Federal Communications Commission is still the body responsible for frequency allocation in the United States, and it does so through a variety of processes, including through the direct creation of rules based on information provided through industry lobbyists and government analysts (FCC 2010a). The use of auctions, in which the licenses to utilize specific frequencies and bandwidths, is often used to give specific access rights to various corporate entities, but this occurs only after the radio wave spectrum has been divided into the many different broader categories and purposes for which radio waves are used (Webpaz 2010).

The reasons behind the need for frequency allocation should be fairly clear at this point; the reasons for developing and adjusting specific processes to achieve these allocations is perhaps less so. Essentially, processes must be developed to keep broadcast rights and frequency access fair and effective, ensuring that it isn't simply the entity with the most money that has the greatest broadcast rights (Withers 1999). Processes are deigned to ensure that necessary technologies and companies have the access to the radio wave spectrum that they need while keeping the allocation as democratic as possible (FCC 2010a).


Determining the cost of "owning" a frequency (which is more accurately described as leasing the license to use a particular frequency, as the broadcast spectrum is actually considered a public commodity and thus cannot be technically owned by any private or for-profit entity, or any entity at all, for that matter) is a complex matter. Certain bandwidths are specifically reserved for public use, such as amateur radio operators and enthusiasts; these frequencies are essentially free but there are significant limitations to broadcast strength and distance that are available in these frequencies (NITA 2010; Withers 1999). When it comes to the cost of stronger bandwidths with a greater latitude of rights in the use of these frequencies, prices are quite high -- over ten billion dollars was spent in a bidding process for the ultra-high frequency channels 60 through 69 in a recent auction for newly available frequencies (Cringely 2008). This equates to more than one billion dollars for every useful stretch of bandwidth made available in this auction, presenting a rice tag that is definitely out of reach for the average consumer and even most companies.

In order to even be able to bid for open frequencies, a certain amount of money must be initially deposited at the beginning of the bidding process (Cramton 2004). The amount deposited determines how many "items" (i.e. sections of bandwidth) a given company can bid on, meaning that companies with lower deposits are able to bid on fewer sections of bandwidth (Cramton 2004). While there is no official minimum price to enter a bid, these rules effectively create limits wherein companies without sufficient funds to make a realistic bid are left out of the process.

SAA-Simultaneous Ascending Auction

The current process used by the Federal Communications Commission to allocate bandwidth to various companies for a variety of uses -- sometimes at the complete discretion of the purchasing entities, and other times for fairly specific purposes such as television broadcasting or cell phone communications -- is the Simultaneous Ascending Auction, first used in 1994 (Cramton 2004). Briefly put, a simultaneous ascending auction is a bidding process in which successive rounds of sealed bidding for multiple items takes place, with the high bids for each items being published at the end of each round, enabling bidders to see what current bids are and adjusting their bids for items in the next round accordingly (Cramton 2004; Milgrom 1999).

This auction system is especially useful for purposes of frequency allocation because there are generally multiple sections of… [END OF PREVIEW] . . . READ MORE

Two Ordering Options:

Which Option Should I Choose?
1.  Buy full paper (8 pages)Download Microsoft Word File

Download the perfectly formatted MS Word file!

- or -

2.  Write a NEW paper for me!✍🏻

We'll follow your exact instructions!
Chat with the writer 24/7.

Allocation of Resources Essay

Risk Assessment for Cybertrans Ltd., a Logistics Research Paper

Contrarian Investment Strategies Thesis

Addressing Wireless Networking Technology and Security a Moving Target Research Proposal

Satellite Communication With Mars Term Paper

View 200+ other related papers  >>

How to Cite "Frequency Allocation" Research Paper in a Bibliography:

APA Style

Frequency Allocation.  (2010, October 18).  Retrieved October 31, 2020, from

MLA Format

"Frequency Allocation."  18 October 2010.  Web.  31 October 2020. <>.

Chicago Style

"Frequency Allocation."  October 18, 2010.  Accessed October 31, 2020.