Home  >  Subjects  >  Women / Feminism  >  current page My Profile

Gender SegregationEssay

Pages: 9 (3890 words)  |  Style: Harvard  |  Sources: 25

Custom Writing

Leadership and Management Development: Gender Segregation at Senior Management Level

Occupational segregation

Performance Assessments

Women in senior management positions in international firms

Gender Inequality of well-Known Organizations

Lack of role models

Financial implications

Stereotypical views

Fear of failure or success

Competing responsibilities

It is clear that when it comes to the senior management level, women are going through greater obstacles and have to depend on methods for advancement that are much different from their male equivalents (Abrams, 2013). Research does show that most of the discrimination that occurred against women shows itself in many types, this does comprise of the following: wage tips, job segregation, sexual harassment, the rejection of career development chances (as well as mentoring and poor performance assessments), and a lack of promotion chances. Now days, women that are working outside of the home calls have to have more education just to make it at senior management level. In addition, those that chose to be working mothers are normally stereotyped as not being reliable or even serious enough to take certain places as managers for the reason their importance lean more in the direction of raising a family; this is most of the time offered as an either/or disagreement, successfully advancing the myth that successful senior management level women are incapable to take on multiple priorities. As a result, women are not taken seriously at that management level. It is evident that if women are to earn an impartial salary and experience career gratification, if companies are to benefit completely from the abilities of qualified managers, particular workplace conducts and attitudes will need to change. With that being said, this paper will explore the gender segregation at the senior management level.

Occupational segregation

Research has shown that almost 100% of senior managers that work at the Fortune 500 companies are clearly men. When it comes to the Fortune 2000 companies, there is just 4% of senior managers that are actually women (Acker, 2013). when observed, these statistics do show a disturbing numerical summary when data does show that the percentage of bachelor's degrees received by women increased from 45% in 1975 to 50% in 1985 and to 60% in 2005. Parallel growth occurs at the master's degree level as well: from 35% in 1975 to 58% in 1985 and 60 percentage in 2005. When it comes to degrees that are received at the bachelor's level the amount went up from 8% in 1975 to 40% in 1985 and 59%in 2005 (Acker, 2009). When bringing up the master's level, the proportion of degrees received by women went from a low of 5% in 1970 to 26% in 1985 and 60% in 2000 (Aizawa, 2013). As a result, more women are graduating from university, more females are even getting their degrees in business, and nevertheless their attendance in senior management level is tiny. In spite of making up above two-thirds of the U.S. population and beyond 58% of the U.S. labor force in 1995, women were understated when it came down to senior management levels (Albiston, 2011).

As a result, as women move to the executive suite they actually start going through a much wider wage gap, proposing that recompense arrangements may have a "blue line" that women have trouble trying to go across; as a result, recompense arrangements may not be fair to women. With a study done on managerial pay concerning above 3,000 managers from more than 600 corporations, outcomes point out that not merely do women administrators make about 11% fewer than male managers, but then again pay of both men and women bosses likewise is connected to the sexual category and age of those they are actually working with. Research shows that with respects to gender, the study makes the discovery that managerial pay is lesser when the manager's reference group is mainly female, when subordinates are outside the prime age group, and when peers and supervisors are youthful. Particular answers concerning gender and pay specify that: (1) Executive pay turn out to be considerably poorer as the proportion of females that the manager supervises goes up. For instance, on average, a male or female director whose secondary group is included of 90% woman accepts around $8,000 less in pay than a manager whose secondary group is 90% man does (Anker, 2012).

Performance Assessments

Even when it comes to television, there is still very much bias. Television entertainment is time and again symbolic of social realities, so it may not be astonishing that when television shows such as The Apprentice seem to favor the men when it comes to getting a position in the senior management level ranks. (Blackburn, 2012) Most of the time in certain seasons, the women were clearly eliminated in order to make room for the men to grab the senior management level positions." Another thing that was interesting was the fact that some of the men were even censured for their leadership role at the senior management level. It was very clear that none of the men were dismissed. Others would probably even argue that it even possible gender has such a big influence on the performance ratings of those women that are trying for the senior management level spot on a hit television show? If these television shows can find a way to play up societal realism, people would then think that women when giving some kind of a rate by men will get less favorable ratings related to ratings that men give to other men. In the UK, there have been many studies which have shown that women are more probable than men to obtain high performance assessments (Cleveland, 2015), nevertheless this prejudice takes place at lower pay grades (p. 643). In the same way, in the U.S. female applicants aided beyond males from ratings when assessed by males (Crompton, 2012). Now there were other studies show no important gender effect in job performance evaluations (Abrams, 2013).Up till now women were professed to be less likely to be helped than men. Provided the rise in pay for presentation, and that women are getting a lot less promising acknowledgements than men; women can be anticipated to be endorsed at a lesser rate than men.

Women in senior management positions in international firms

As said by two new surveys of Fortune 500 companies by not-for-profit research group Catalyst. On the plus side, notes some experts, men-only Senate hearings and other extremely visible events in 2014 meant that "so many people started asking, 'Where are the women?' In a progressively diverse society, individuals are getting less at ease with seeing these groups of the influential who are all white males in international firms." More women are involved in careers in the communications sector, but few have attained positions at the senior management level serve on leading boards and bodies that effect media policy," as stated by the Beijing 20 study. "The lack of gender compassion in the mass media is demonstrated by the disappointment to remove the gender-based typecasting that can be originated in public and private local, national and international media organizations."

In Saudi Arabia, women aren't permitted to drive and are disheartened from working jobs that would put them in contact with men or in a senior management position. The joblessness rate for women is 35% for women, 8% for men (Acker, 2009). Five female ministers were appointed in the recent cabinet reshuffle in September 2014 to senior management positions, but within a month two were forced to leave their jobs. Women are significantly underrepresented in economic decision-making positions in Germany in addition to in the EU-27. Merely 18% of board positions in big corporations are engaged by women (Crompton, 2012)the share of women in (executive) management places in huge enterprises and is 33%. Regardless of an existing voluntary contract of German businesses from 2007 to bring more women into senior management positions, the share of women on boards in 2013 is only 3 pp above the share in 2007 (Acker, 2009). The portion of women in senior management positions merely increased by 2 in 2014, the 30 largest listed businesses agreed to willingly raise the share of women in senior management positions up to 36% by 2021.

Gender Inequality of well-Known Organizations

On March 28, 2015 a jury found that the venerable venture capital firm Kleiner Perkins had not was not doing gender bias against a previous junior partner, Ellen Pao, for the reason that she is a woman (Ellis, 2012). Regardless of the verdict, Pao and other women in the tech industry persisted to be defiant at claiming that women were not allowed to climb the ladder. Even though Pao's trial was under way, previous workers at Twitter and Facebook filed gender discrimination law suits. "I have told my story, and thousands of people have heard it," Pao told reporters outside the courtroom (Crompton, 2012). "The battle was worth it if I helped level the playing field for minorities and women in venture capital.

Also, another incident involved,… [END OF PREVIEW]

Download Full Paper (9 pages; perfectly formatted; Microsoft Word file) Microsoft Word File

Politics of Gender and Sexuality in Aristophanes Lysistrata


Gender Segregated Math Classes in Middle School


Gender Gap Wages


How Gender Specific Behavior Is Imposed on Children


Gender & Race in the Presidential Campaign


View 348 other related papers  >>

Cite This Paper:

APA Format

Gender Segregation.  (2015, April 27).  Retrieved November 22, 2017, from https://www.essaytown.com/subjects/paper/gender-segregation/8763734

MLA Format

"Gender Segregation."  27 April 2015.  Web.  22 November 2017. <https://www.essaytown.com/subjects/paper/gender-segregation/8763734>.

Chicago Format

"Gender Segregation."  Essaytown.com.  April 27, 2015.  Accessed November 22, 2017.
https://www.essaytown.com/subjects/paper/gender-segregation/8763734.

Disclaimer