Global Communication Research Paper

Pages: 4 (1429 words)  ·  Bibliography Sources: 4  ·  File: .docx  ·  Level: Doctorate  ·  Topic: Business - Management

Global Communication Scenario

The Scenario

Download full Download Microsoft Word File
paper NOW!
The General Electric (GE) Country Managers' Meeting being held in Paris, France brought together leaders from Japan, Nigeria, France and India to discuss how they could coordinate more effectively in new product development. The meeting often became very heated between the French and Japanese general management teams as each felt the other sent mixed signals both verbally and non-verbally about their commitment to projects and plans. G.E. senior management had created these cross-functional teams a decade ago and required each Country Manager to participate in person. The concept of creating greater collaboration through tacit knowledge sharing is one of the implicit agenda items of having global teams periodically meet in person (Auch, Smyth, 2010). GE had found that having these in-person team meetings in host countries also brought a greater level of cultural and emotional intelligence to the group over time. For global teams to be effective there needs to be more of a focus on transformation leadership, not just the enabling of information transactions, but a sharing of the common vision of the entire group (Bodla, Nawaz, 2010). GE had seen this in their training programs, and realizing that the four nations included in the session often were the most contentious with each other in e-mail, conference calls and varying philosophical views, it was deliberate that they all ended up in the same room in Paris for a quarterly meeting. With the topic being the development of entirely new approaches to launching GE produces concurrently across their geographies, the teams began debating how best to orchestrate a new product launch across all their regions. Immediately it became apparent that the differences between Japan and France would be very difficult to get around. The Vice President, Products for GE, headquartered in the U.S. took control of the meeting and attempted to keep it on target towards its goals.

Anatomy of a Leadership Challenge

TOPIC: Research Paper on Global Communication Assignment

What is at stake in the meeting is the launch of a new series of medical products that are to be manufactured in each of the countries represented. It's critical that the common manufacturing processes and steps be defined across all four nations to ensure high quality of production. It is essential for Japan and India work closely together, as Japan will do the R&D on next-generation systems and India will produce the majority of them. France and its exceptional quality control and quality management practices, which are highly regarded through the GE culture, will have complete control over approving production builds from India. This is the catalyst of so many disagreements between Japan and India vs. France. French quality management teams will leave nothing to change and often require intensive work analysis to determine if and when a component will fail in production. This is not possible to know many times until production starts and in that disagreement is where many of the arguments begin.

As the Country Managers are seated around the table, the VP of products for GE goes around the table and asks for input on the agenda he has placed on the whiteboard in the front of the room. Yet this VP is different than others because he has the sales goals for the new product defined at the top of the board and the key measures of performance by country right below it. He is attempting to show why cooperating and working together is literally the only way the sales goal can be achieved. As he points to each country and explains how their contributions, turn-around times, and most importantly, cooperation and collaboration all affects the revenue figure, he does something even more important. He walks in front of each, stops, and asks for agreement. Transformational leaders have the ability to create consensus and support with emotional intelligence and the development of consensus over time (Bodla, Nawaz, 2010). The focus is on raising the level of awareness of just how much it costs the company for the continual bickering and arguing, and how the time list in conflict is time away from accomplishing critical goals that define the future of this division of GE. The Country Managers nod in agreement and each then presents how they plan to support the new product introduction. Within five minutes of the India discussion… [END OF PREVIEW] . . . READ MORE

Two Ordering Options:

Which Option Should I Choose?
1.  Download full paper (4 pages)Download Microsoft Word File

Download the perfectly formatted MS Word file!

- or -

2.  Write a NEW paper for me!✍🏻

We'll follow your exact instructions!
Chat with the writer 24/7.

Global Communication in Business Term Paper

Global Communication Benchmarking Term Paper

Global Communications Decide on a New Cultural Term Paper

Problem Solution Global Communications Term Paper

Communication Differences Develop a Two-Page Paper Term Paper

View 200+ other related papers  >>

How to Cite "Global Communication" Research Paper in a Bibliography:

APA Style

Global Communication.  (2010, October 2).  Retrieved November 30, 2021, from

MLA Format

"Global Communication."  2 October 2010.  Web.  30 November 2021. <>.

Chicago Style

"Global Communication."  October 2, 2010.  Accessed November 30, 2021.