Globalization Making Society Better Term Paper

Pages: 7 (1881 words)  ·  Style: MLA  ·  Bibliography Sources: 5  ·  File: .docx  ·  Topic: Economics

Globalization: Making Society Better

One of the most divisive and polarizing issues today is the judgments people are making with regard to globalization. From being demonized to lauded as the most critical economic engine underprivileged nations have to rely on, globalization's influence is often clouded by inaccurate and often biased reporting and slanted by the political agendas of nations affected by its dynamics. Paradoxically the nations that have resisted globalization including many in Latin America are suffering economically more than ever before mainly due to its political instability and anti-globalization stance. Conversely China and the Pacific Rim nations have taken a decidedly pro-globalization stance and as a result are reaping both democratic and economic gains, leading to gains in education, health care and ultimately the abilities of their countries to compete globally more effectively. The intent of this paper is to argue the benefits of globalization and how nations' economies are further strengthened by participating and competing as a result.

Defining GlobalizationBuy full Download Microsoft Word File paper
for $19.77

Term Paper on Globalization Making Society Better Assignment

Evidence of just how polarized the views of globalization are is evidenced in the many definitions of what it is. Globalization has been defined by a multitude of examples and constructs, each slanted to the specific philosophical leanings of the authors. One of the most neutral definitions of globalization has been defined (World) as "the growing integration of economies and societies around the world." Anti-globalization activists point to drastically underpaid workers, misappropriation of revenues, cultures being desolated and westernized at the expense of their innate richness, and the long-term depleting of 3rd world nations'; human and natural resources for the sake of multinational corporations' gains in profits. In fact globalization is responsible for healthcare, education, food distribution and retailing at competitive prices, and the development of entire nations' infrastructures through the use of foreign direct investment (FDI) in conjunction with joint ventures and other forms of risk and gain sharing. The telecommunications infrastructure of India for example (Chakraborty & Basu 135-142). The influence of FDI on the Indian communications infrastructure has also lead to the development of entirely new forms of order management systems across industries, increasing the velocity of transactions between India and trader nations in the process (Chakraborty & Basu 141). The many instances of how globalization has been responsible for more efficient and timely food distribution throughout India is another case in point (Attwood, 2067).

In the context of the 21st century globalization has been written by Thomas Friedman, author of several best-selling books on the topic of globalization has defined the concept as follows:

The inexorable integration of markets, nation-states, and technologies to a degree never witnessed before-in a way that is enabling individuals, corporations and nation-states to reach around the world farther, faster, deeper and cheaper than ever before.... The spread of free-market capitalism to virtually every country in the world " (T.L. Friedman, p. 7-8).

In evaluating the contributions of globalization to the growth of economies, the theories of Dr. Michael Porter are also insightful to use as theoretical constructs. Specifically Porter's Determinant of Competitive Advantage as defined in his books and articles (Porter, 12-27) reflect an extension to the Ricardian-based theories of global trade competitiveness emanating from productivity of specific industries within nations, stating that productivity is the clearest measure of national competitiveness. (Heckscher and Ohlin. 125-135, 150) have stated in much of their analysis that the basis of specialization and hence trade advantages are the results of differences in factor endowments, and that the rate of change across factor endowments within nations has a significant effect on their progress towards economic growth. Their analysis supports the hypothesis that factor endowments are actually generated through the interaction between and within trading partner organizations that comprise a given nations' economic and socio-cultural fabric. In other words, a nations' ecosystem is made more effective, valuable, and able to concentrate on its core strengths and refine them than if they operated purely in isolation. Accordingly the role of globalization is seen as the catalyst for allowing the innate strengths of a given nation to come to fruition more efficiently and with greater competitive strength than if they had been protected or otherwise subsidized by well0-meaning yet ill-informed governments (Milner and Kubota, 107-124). In short, the competition that globalization fosters actually brings out the innate strengths of nations and their economies, further increasing their ability to become self-sustaining and increase the quality of life for its citizens (Sirgy, Lee, Miller, Littlefield, Atay, 220-224). It is not, as the anti-globalization activists' claims, due to the paternalistic and accused graft- and corruption-based approaches to managing global expansion in 3rd world nations (Bhagwati, 10-12) or in the use of funding to forward socially based agendas for economic gain, a favorite criticism of anti-globalization activists (Bhagwati2, 439-463). Instead it is in providing the necessary economic spark to get an entire nations' economic engine moving forward rapidly and becoming a global competitor. Globalization fosters all forms of financial independence, leading to democracy and greater levels of personal, ideological and religious freedoms for a nation's citizens. The lack of democracy in Latin America contrasted with the increasing freedoms in China, albeit in small steps, prove this dynamic out clearly. Fostering greater economic growth and getting nations to find their core competitive catalyst are the foundation of freedoms that other nations, not so fortunate to find these innate strengths, continually struggle to find and as a result find it more difficult to compete on a global scale (Sapsford and Garikipati, 1571-1579). The conclusion then is that as global economies become even more competitive than ever before, there is the urgent, critical need for nations of all economic strata, specifically 3rd world nations, to find that core competitive catalyst and capitalize on it (Milner and Kubota, 113-123).

Globalization is forcing a concentrated market orientation

Managerial decision making, once hierarchical and military-like in its chain-of-command in global enterprises, is in the middle of a significant change also due to globalization. Where tight, inward-facing hierarchies once ruled global enterprises and made managerial decision making more of an exercise of the chain of command, today agility and the responsiveness of global organizations reacting to local markets are the hallmark of high performing companies (Sapsford and Garikipati, 1574-1575).

Analyzing globalization in light of these theories also shows that the progression nations go through to find their core competitive catalyst is a gradual one, yet must be brought out through continual trading with outside partners (Bhagwati2, 439-463).

Competitors on a global playing field are moving away from assuming the future is predictable and relatively certain, to a managerial world today where even change itself is changing faster than many managers can keep up. These high velocity forces of change are changing global competition and completely re-writing corporate cultures in the process.

In reality global competition is brought on more by the core strengths of nations emerging from localized, then regionalized and finally global competitive prominence. (Porter, 12-27) argues that when industries become strong through local competition, their global competitiveness is assured. This is quite a contrarian view from the majority of organizations today that see their offshore competitors as purely being driven by cost reduction. When cost reduction is seen as the greatest competitive threat, it's easy for complacent organizations to rationalize that their products deliver superior value to their low-cost rivals. Yet the organizations with complacent cultures would do well to look deeper at their global competitors and realize a few key points. First, the fact that for many of these low-cost competitors, their core strength is in taking production, selling, and service processes to a new level of simplicity; something a competitor in a complacent environment will not even see. Second, there is the fact that every organization today is on a global playing field, every day, whether they want to see that perspective or not. Third, the fact that there are price leaders in every industry is no predictor of industry consolidation or contraction. When one considers these three key points its clear that for even the most complacent of organizations, they must see themselves as being a global competitor if they are to survive. Managerial decisions need to be more about heightening customer value over simply turning a deaf ear to global competition.


Globalization is essential for any nation to find its competitive catalyst for growth, and fuel a higher level of economic and social freedoms for its citizens. While detractors to globalization argue for isolationism, this strategy just weakens industries and nations faster than a drop-off in educational spending or infrastructure. To become protectionist is to rob citizens of their freedoms at the most basic level, for without a nation relying on and strengthening its catalyst of competitive growth, it begins to atrophy and die. The confusion and leanings toward socialism and communism in Latin America are a testament to this dynamic where the free market economies of the Pacific Rim show the converse. Even China, the last bastion of communism, has become the world's manufacturing center, and as a result, their… [END OF PREVIEW] . . . READ MORE

Two Ordering Options:

Which Option Should I Choose?
1.  Buy full paper (7 pages)Download Microsoft Word File

Download the perfectly formatted MS Word file!

- or -

2.  Write a NEW paper for me!✍🏻

We'll follow your exact instructions!
Chat with the writer 24/7.

Define Globalization Term Paper

Globalization, if Explained in Economic Terms Term Paper

Globalization Impact Research Paper

Globalization at General Electric: Discussion Questions Case Study

Globalization and Its Impact on the World Term Paper

View 200+ other related papers  >>

How to Cite "Globalization Making Society Better" Term Paper in a Bibliography:

APA Style

Globalization Making Society Better.  (2007, December 14).  Retrieved June 3, 2020, from

MLA Format

"Globalization Making Society Better."  14 December 2007.  Web.  3 June 2020. <>.

Chicago Style

"Globalization Making Society Better."  December 14, 2007.  Accessed June 3, 2020.