GOP's 2016 Tax Reform Proposal Term Paper

Pages: 25 (7762 words)  ·  Bibliography Sources: 0  ·  File: .docx  ·  Level: Doctorate  ·  Topic: Business  ·  Written: April 24, 2017

[26: Bill Vlasic, Trump, in Meeting, Urges Automakers to Build in United States, The New York Times (2017), (last visited Apr 24, 2017).] [27: Geoff Colvin, Donald Trump's Border Tax May Not Hit American Importers at All Donald Trump's Border Tax May Not Hit American Importers at All, (2017), (last visited Apr 24, 2017).] [28: Adam Samson, US Exports Take the Strain of a Strong Dollar, Financial Times, (last visited Apr 24, 2017).]

Download full Download Microsoft Word File
paper NOW!

Term Paper on GOP's 2016 Tax Reform Proposal Assignment

The direct impact on American workers is considerably hypothetical -- but there are likely a number of variables that could impact their situation, with the border adjustment tax being merely one of them. Isolated as a mechanism to create job growth in the U.S., theoretically it offers a conduit to that goal; however, as Colvin has stated, there is no real precedent for the tax proposal that the GOP has put forward.[footnoteRef:29] Value-added-taxes have been used in Europe to positive effect, but the outcome of border adjustment tax in America could in fact hurt American workers employed by American exporters as it could "destroy manufacturing jobs, not create them," as Williams reports.[footnoteRef:30] This argument is made by the Motor Equipment Manufacturers Association, which holds that the border adjustment tax "could raise vehicle prices by as much as $2,500"[footnoteRef:31] -- and in an industry that is already over-saturated and in need of deep incentives to move product,[footnoteRef:32] any cuts in margins could lead to cuts in jobs, as "the global automotive supply chain is complex and integrated into almost every vehicle manufactured, including those made in the U.S."[footnoteRef:33] Small businesses that rely on imported parts could equally be hurt by the tax -- unless manufacturing in the U.S. were to suddenly grow exponentially and to such an extent that reliance upon foreign-labor produced parts would dissipate quickly. It is this latter prospect that the Trump Administration appears to be resting its assumptions on. [29: Colvin, supra note 27.] [30: David Williams, GOP's border tax will kill blue-collar jobs and harm consumers, TheHill (2017), (last visited Apr 24, 2017).] [31: Williams, supra note 28.] [32: Bill Vlasic, Record 2016 for U.S. Auto Industry; Long Road Back May Be at End, The New York Times (2017), (last visited Apr 24, 2017).] [33: Williams, supra note 30.]

C. Intellectual Origins: The True Intention of the Border Tax

Yet, if the actual outcome of the border adjustment tax on the American worker is unclear at best, perhaps the tax is being proposed for an ulterior motive. To understand the GOP's proposal, it is helpful to obtain context -- to identify the Intellectual origins of the border tax. The man described as the tax proposal's "principal intellectual champion in the United States" is an economist at the University of California, Berkeley, named Alan Auerbach -- and his goal in promoting the tax is to ensure that "incentives will align with the national interest."[footnoteRef:34] The destination-based tax is one that Auerbach believes "is an adaptation to the modern economy of open borders and advancing technology" -- a system in which multinational corporations are able to shift assets such as intellectual property like patents and software to countries that are tax-friendly as a way to protect profit margins: the border adjustment tax would theoretically, according to Auerbach, eliminate "incentives to game the system."[footnoteRef:35] [34: Steve Lohr, New Approach to Corporate Tax Law Has House G.O.P. Support, The New York Times (2016), (last visited Apr 24, 2017).] [35: Lohr, supra note 34.]

Auerbach's ideas found political support in the Texas Republican and chairman of the House Ways and Means Committee Rep. Brady, who is at the center of the GOP's border adjustment tax proposal. Brady's stated aim has been to "level the playing field for made-in-America products."[footnoteRef:36] In effect, the tax proposal is a challenge to the World Trade Organization, to free trade agreements such as NAFTA, and to globalism in general. The ideological nexus of the tax is one that promotes the "America First" theme of the Trump Administration -- but in actuality the effect of the tax will not be felt in a vacuum or, in fact, in a world that is wholly controlled or controllable by Brady, Auerbach or the Trump Administration. The tax proposal is more akin, in this light, to a paring thrust in an economic match of wits in a much larger game consisting of social, political and other economic factors and nuances. Auerbach himself has admitted as much, stating, "Economists don't rule the world; I understand that . . . .You never know when or if your policy ideas will have an impact."[footnoteRef:37] The intellectual origins of the border tax adjustment proposal are thus situated less in perfectly calculated plan to promote the interests of the American worker than in a nationalistic approach to tax code reformation -- one that would challenge decades of trade policies that have promoted offshoring. Whether the tax proposal would in the end actually benefit the American worker or simply lead to more economic devastation domestically as multinationals look for leverage to wield against such a proposal is something that remains in the realm of the speculative for now. [36: Lohr, supra note 34.] [37: Lohr, supra note 34.]

III. Alternatives to the Border Adjustment Tax

Alternatives to the border adjustment tax that could be better be suited for achieving Trump's stated objective of creating American jobs, particularly in the manufacturing sector include: 1) the application of ethical consumption laws, 2) the strengthening of International Labor Organization (ILO) so that labor conditions violations could be referred to the WTO, and 3) reduction of U.S. trade deficits through negotiation with trade partners.

A. Applying Ethical Consumption Laws

As Nicholls states, a "leading form… [END OF PREVIEW] . . . READ MORE

Two Ordering Options:

Which Option Should I Choose?
1.  Download full paper (25 pages)Download Microsoft Word File

Download the perfectly formatted MS Word file!

- or -

2.  Write a NEW paper for me!✍🏻

We'll follow your exact instructions!
Chat with the writer 24/7.

Republican (GOP) Primaries of 2012 Research Paper

GOP vs. DNC Research Proposal

Political Philosophy of the Republican Party Thesis

Republican Ethics the Republican Party Essay

Republican Party Term Paper

View 200+ other related papers  >>

How to Cite "GOP's 2016 Tax Reform Proposal" Term Paper in a Bibliography:

APA Style

GOP's 2016 Tax Reform Proposal.  (2017, April 24).  Retrieved May 13, 2021, from

MLA Format

"GOP's 2016 Tax Reform Proposal."  24 April 2017.  Web.  13 May 2021. <>.

Chicago Style

"GOP's 2016 Tax Reform Proposal."  April 24, 2017.  Accessed May 13, 2021.