Gun Controls "Studies Have Shown Term Paper

Pages: 7 (2326 words)  ·  Bibliography Sources: ≈ 6  ·  File: .docx  ·  Level: College Senior  ·  Topic: Law - Constitutional Law

Contrarily, such revelations findings recommend that high saturations of guns in places or something associated with that condition, have impediments to the illegal hostility. Gurr has revealed that handgun ban would criminalize much of the citizenry however, have little influence on criminals, while overemphasis on such proposals dissuade attention from the kinds of settings that are liable for much of our crime, like perpetuating poverty for the black underclass and some whites and Hispanics. Gurr supplements that guns can be a successful safeguard; referencing that UCLA historian Roger McGrath's evidence from the 19th Century American West shows that extensive gun ownership discouraged acquisitive crimes. He pointed out that modern analysis reveal that extensive gun ownership combats crime. The convicted robbers and burglars reveal that they are discouraged when they find that their potential targets are armed. (Kates, 1995)Buy full Download Microsoft Word File paper
for $19.77

Term Paper on Gun Controls "Studies Have Shown Assignment

In the severe argument over firearms regulation, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention -- CDC report will generate heartburn to the ban-the-gun brigades. As per the Associated Press reports, a sweeping federal review of the gun control regulations of the nation inclusive of the mandatory waiting periods and prohibitions on some specific weapons discover that there is no proof that such measures decrease firearm violence. The analysts also remarked their review of 51 gun laws that firearms associated injuries in this nation have decreased since 1993 irrespective of the fact that about 4.5 million new firearms are sold every year. Among us who having confined confidence in centralized power will not be astonished by the report, not by the verdict of the CDC that it can access no more declarative judgment since many of the gun control regulations it reviewed were not in agreement, overly narrow in scope or poorly implemented. The CDC even conducted this three-year review as a liberal strategy that resulted in splitting the gun violence as a public health issue. (West, 2003)

Guns traditionally are an integral part of our culture. There are presently 36 states in which consent to carry concealed weapons are available to the ordinary citizen with a clean record. The premise of right-to-carry or 'shall issue' legislations is perfectly rational. Predators may be more cautious if they have reason to believe their intended 'victims' might have a filled pistol in pocket or purse or, if the thugs are not that smart, it may not be the law abiding citizen who gets hurt. (West, 2003) The critics of the right-to-carry laws have articulately challenged that if significant numbers of individuals legally can carry weapons there would be a high body count in consequence of weak judgment or accident. That may not appear to be a case in the two states namely Florida and Texas which have had such laws for the longest period. In the mean time, the supporters contend incidents in that crimes are eliminated by armed citizens are underreported and these are actually ignored by the media. John R. Lott Jr., resident scholar at the American Enterprise Institute and a strange supporter and student of such legislations points out that no state having the law pertaining to right-to-carry Guns have revoked it. The widespread popularity of the laws of right to carry Guns will persist to find significance. (West, 2003)

Ultimately it could be advocated that Gun control legislations do not regulate people who are engaged in the violation of laws. Gun control simply makes their potential victims unarmed; entailing the crime a safer profession and therefore, one can be engaged in more extensive crime by more people. The gun-control regulations no more would have deterred the current sniper than they stop innumerable other gun crimes in places with some of the strongest gun-control laws in the country. Even the current nostrum of the gun regulators- ballistic fingerprinting of each gun that is sold already prevails in Maryland where this orgy of murder initiates. There prevails no evidence of any one every being convicted on any crime as a result of this system. (Sowell, 2002)

In conclusion it could be argued that Gun control is of no use in our society as it does not reduce crimes, but on the other hand would have a tendency to increase crimes. Several studies have time and again proved that controlling Guns do not reduce crimes. Guns are needed for the safety of people and there is a need to repeal Gun control.


Cottrol, Robert. J. (September, 1999) "Gun Control is Racist, Sexist & Classist" American Enterprise. Vol: 8; No; 1; pp: 14-16

Graves, Earl. G. (May, 2001) "Stop the Guns - Need for Gun Control Demonstrated by How Easily People Kill with Them" Black Enterprise. Vol: 11; No: 1; pp: 27-30

Kates, Don. B. (6 March, 1995) "Shot Down - Opposition to Gun Control" National Review. Vol: 7; No: 1; pp: 18-20

Lott, John; Lehrer, Eli. (December, 2004) "Gun control flops" American Enterprise. Vol: 12; No: 1; pp: 32-37

Sowell, Thomas. (12 November, 2002) "Gun-Control Crowd Misuses Fear… [END OF PREVIEW] . . . READ MORE

Two Ordering Options:

Which Option Should I Choose?
1.  Buy full paper (7 pages)Download Microsoft Word File

Download the perfectly formatted MS Word file!

- or -

2.  Write a NEW paper for me!✍🏻

We'll follow your exact instructions!
Chat with the writer 24/7.

View 200+ other related papers  >>

How to Cite "Gun Controls "Studies Have Shown" Term Paper in a Bibliography:

APA Style

Gun Controls "Studies Have Shown.  (2005, April 24).  Retrieved August 3, 2020, from

MLA Format

"Gun Controls "Studies Have Shown."  24 April 2005.  Web.  3 August 2020. <>.

Chicago Style

"Gun Controls "Studies Have Shown."  April 24, 2005.  Accessed August 3, 2020.