Term Paper: Gun Violence in America

Pages: 10 (2849 words)  ·  Bibliography Sources: 10  ·  Level: College Junior  ·  Topic: Law - Constitutional Law  ·  Buy This Paper


[. . .] Therefore, it is liberal and enlightened to label American gun owners as deranged and barbaric, as well as anti-citizens engaged in beastly behaviors. Evaluations have accurately described opponents of gun ownership as bloodthirsty demented psychopaths with the primary concept of raining death on innocent citizens of America. These groups of people regard the issue as egregious stereotypes when others blame gay advocates for lobbying against close bath ordinances. Activists of gun ownership have been described as death merchants and murderers dismissing welfare of the community and homeless people as drug barons, retarded or alcoholic. Because opponents of gun ownership are considerably eager to raise opposition against racism, other evils such as gay bashing are also stereotypes. On the other hand, it constitutes to myopia stereotypes or hypocrisy (Webster & Vernick, 2013).

The impact on culture & how culture affects this issue

In the U.S., gun control and gun writes are operating at mutually exclusive premises. While one takes a state of tyranny, the other one assumes a state of benevolence. While on of them argues modern progress, the other rests its claims on tradition. Anthropologist Gary has established that defensive use of guns in deterring crime is more frequent than official data released by the government indicates. Accumulating statistics shows that widespread ownership of guns reduces the rate of crime because the cost of committing this criminal crime is increased. Armed crime victims leads to high stake; limbs and lives. It is evident that gun control has the likelihood of reducing crimes related to gun ownership (Levesque, 2002).

From a cultural perspective, crime rates are not the main point. It appears that the government is committing public resources towards enforcement, legislation and adjudication of gun control laws for classic and unmentionable state reasons. This issue has a cultural polarizing impact likely to become a boom for the nation. This might result in major divisions across government ranks for a combat of symbols absorbing state energies leaving the experts to do the actual governing. Mutual disruptions between working class conservatives and middle class progressives are likely to result in a salutary political impact. This would pre-empt the development of an extremely popular mandate for enormous systemic changes (Strain, 2010).

The recent American history provides an excellent example of how the above polarization impact works. Culture wars and issues of gun control have been referred to as wedge issues. The polarization between the modern and the traditional cultural issues reflects the feelings of the wedged part. In this regard, the wedged part is the middle class vs. The working class political coalitions in the ear of the New delta. Political alliance brought about the Act of Glass-Steagall and more restrictions on capital flow, which would impede the growth of globalization. For anyone to connect these dots, he/she does not need a conspiracy theory. It takes a longer cultural perspective (Sheley & Wright, 2005).

Guns are deadly and if they are owned by anyone, it would mean that all the citizens including non-citizens are at risk. People across the globe are involved in this practice. Therefore, the global stage must focus on this topic and approach it with interested relativism. Depending on an individual, people can be vocal and open about their views, as these troubles are profound. I think anthropologists should react by providing maximum attention on the issue and should not worry about reflexivity and theorizing. This should include more research findings and calls for action on anthro blog posts and feeds. Anthropologists must outreach suggestions; plan conferences, press attention and exercise close activism in displaying a fight for accessing academic scales of payment (Bailey & Peoples, 2010).

Philosophers such as Aristotle have posed questions regarding the difference between historical and anthropological approaches with insights about mental health, violence and gun control in America, educators have been asked to provide possible reactions of what they would do in case of an eruption of a mass shooting in the school context. As much as this would be an anthropological response, it is also more of a natural human response. This perspective asks the right questions, which elicits different answers (Cook & Ludwig, 2007). Not all anthropologists have the likelihood of embarking on ethnographies concerning gun weapon control. Studies are still ongoing about aspects associated with U.S. politics and gun control. U.S. has more pro-gun advocates than they are anti-guns activists; democrats form the larger pro-gun movement while republicans make the lesser anti-gun movement. Party lines have only been offering rough guidelines that contradict each other across the country. Even with all the efforts supporting the fight against gun ownership, some citizens are politically apathetic using constitutional powers to kill. This is because the U.S. has become one of the freest countries where people relish in the freedom of fully equipping themselves just to kill. This happens even when it is not necessary to kill (Kleck, 2007).

As time goes, this issue is becoming more complex hence not easy to solve; no time should be wasted at all. There is far much slow changing geared towards rescuing millions of unreasonable murders every year. It would be farcical for the U.S. government to reduce the number of legally used bullets in a magazine of semi-automatic guns hence the gun control. Victory has been realized because citizens no longer purchase weaponry over the internet supplies. This has led to reductions in many states although legalized private gun ownership exists. Further, this activity has been legal for many years and most cities have left a wide range of different types of guns to be freely traded online (Levesque, 2002).


In the U.S., guns have been reported to be the main cause of deaths with high rates of people expected to die from gunshots. Reports indicate that most of these deaths occur in relatively tiny urban regions. This makes the common citizen to feel that they have limited chances of experiencing gun violence. Politics and politicians are only concerned with their personal interests (Wright, Rossi, Daly & Weber, 2006). For people to get interested in n issue, they must be convinced that there is a high possibility of being affected by the issue. In case they do not understand this, they will not be expected to participate in the issue. Since gun violence does not affect most Americans, millions of gun owners believe that they have high chances of seeing a personal and immediate impact if measures of gun control are passed. This means that these people will not be able to purchase ammunition magazines or certain types of guns. This is an adequate reason pointing towards the position of Americas regarding gun control (Strain, 2010).


Bailey, A., & Peoples, G. (2010). Essentials of cultural anthropology. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth/Cengage.

Carter, L. (2002). Guns in American society: An encyclopedia of history, politics, culture, and the law. Santa Barbara, CA: ABC-CLIO, Inc.

Cook, J., & Ludwig, J. (2007). Gun violence: The real costs. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

DeConde, A. (2009). Gun violence in America: The struggle for control. Boston, Mass: Northeastern Univ. Press.

Franzese, J., Covey, C., Menard, W., & Covey, C. (2006). Youth gangs. Springfield, Ill: Charles C. Thomas.

Gullotta, P., Adams, G.R., & Ramos, J.M. (2008). Handbook of adolescent behavioral problems: Evidence-based approaches to prevention and treatment. New York, NY: Springer.

Iadicola, P., & Shupe, A. (2013). Violence, inequality, and human freedom. Lanham, Md: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers.

Kleck, G. (2007). Point blank: Guns and violence in America. New Brunswick, N.J: Aldine Transaction.

Levesque, R. (2002). Dangerous adolescents, model adolescents: Shaping the role and promise of education. New York: Kluwer academic.

Sheley, F., & Wright, D. (2005). In the line of fire: Youths, guns, and violence in urban America. New York: Aldine de Gruyter.

Strain, B. (2010). Reload: Rethinking violence in American life. Nashville: Vanderbilt University Press.

Strain, B. (2010). Reload: Rethinking violence in American life. Nashville: Vanderbilt University Press.

Webster, W., & Vernick, S. (2013). Reducing gun violence in America: Informing policy with evidence and analysis. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.

Wright, J.D.,… [END OF PREVIEW]

Four Different Ordering Options:

Which Option Should I Choose?

1.  Buy the full, 10-page paper:  $28.88


2.  Buy + remove from all search engines
(Google, Yahoo, Bing) for 30 days:  $38.88


3.  Access all 175,000+ papers:  $41.97/mo

(Already a member?  Click to download the paper!)


4.  Let us write a NEW paper for you!

Ask Us to Write a New Paper
Most popular!

Gun Violence Research Paper

Gun Control Changed by Customer in Comments A-Level Outline Answer

Gun Control and Crime in the Black Community Literature Review Chapter

Gun Control in NY State Term Paper

Public Problem Why Gun Laws Should Be Changed Term Paper

View 448 other related papers  >>

Cite This Term Paper:

APA Format

Gun Violence in America.  (2013, April 18).  Retrieved May 23, 2019, from https://www.essaytown.com/subjects/paper/gun-violence-america/3313283

MLA Format

"Gun Violence in America."  18 April 2013.  Web.  23 May 2019. <https://www.essaytown.com/subjects/paper/gun-violence-america/3313283>.

Chicago Format

"Gun Violence in America."  Essaytown.com.  April 18, 2013.  Accessed May 23, 2019.