Hip Replacement Surgery: Qualitative Analysis Research Paper

Pages: 6 (2780 words)  |  Style: n/a  |  Bibliography Sources: 3

To download the full paper, scroll down!

SAMPLE EXCERPT:

[. . .] Data Collection:

While focusing on the data collection methods, the first question was whether data collection focused on human experience? (LoBiondo-Wood and Haber, 2014) The answer is yes; the data collection focused on human experience in this study. The second question was whether the researcher describe data collections strategies (i.e. interviews, observation, field notes)? (LoBiondo-Wood and Haber, 2014) The answer once again is yes; the researcher has described data collections strategies in this study. The third question was whether the protection of human participants was addressed? (LoBiondo-Wood and Haber, 2014) The answer to this query is Yes. The participants provided written consent regarding their participation in the study after receiving oral and written information. The forth question focused on whether saturation of the data was described? The researcher in this study has not described the saturation of data. The last question in this section was, "what are the procedures for collecting data? The researcher in this study used interviews recorded in a tape and transcribed precisely.

Data Analysis:

The first question in the data analysis section was, "what strategies are used to analyze the data?" (LoBiondo-Wood and Haber, 2014) Data in this study was analyzed through content analysis that is empirically oriented and relied on codes derived from the data, decreased inference explanation of the data and representation of the data in daily language. The second question was, "has the researcher remained true to the data?" (LoBiondo-Wood and Haber, 2014) It appears that the researcher has not remained true to the data, since the researchers altered the categorized data constantly during analysis. The third question was, "Does the reader follow the steps described for data analysis?" (LoBiondo-Wood and Haber, 2014) The steps are also not clearly stated for the reader to understand and follow. The last question in the data analysis section was, "does the researcher address the credibility, auditability, & fittingness of the data?" The answer is yes; the researcher has addressed the credibility, auditability, & fittingness of the data here.

Credibility:

The first question asked on the credibility of the data analysis was, "do the participants recognize the experience as their own?" (LoBiondo-Wood and Haber, 2014) The answer is yes; however, some of the responses are shortened. Nevertheless, the results include some quotes from the informants, which allow them to recognize their experience in the statements. The second question was, "has adequate time been allowed to full understand the phenomenon?" (LoBiondo-Wood and Haber, 2014) Unfortunately no, adequate time has not been allowed to fully understand the phenomenon.

Auditability:

The first question asked on the auditability of the data analysis was, "can the reader follow the researcher's thinking?" (LoBiondo-Wood and Haber, 2014) The answer here is Yes. The researcher's systematic thinking and way of carrying out the study is easy for the reader to follow. The second question was, "does the researcher document the research process?" (LoBiondo-Wood and Haber, 2014) The answer to this query is Yes. The researchers provide a detailed explanation from the selection of the participants to the participants consenting and being involved in interviews. The researchers move on to analyze the results to understand the phenomenon properly and even present and discuss the results.

Fittingness:

The first question asked on the fittingness of the data analysis was, "are the findings applicable outside of the study situation? (LoBiondo-Wood and Haber, 2014) Unfortunately the answer to this query is no. The findings provide information applicable only in pain and pain relief situations. The second question was, "are the results meaningful to individuals not involved in the research?" (LoBiondo-Wood and Haber, 2014) The answer here is Yes. The researchers present their results in a manner that is easy for anyone not involved in the study to understand and make sense of it. The third question was, "is the strategy used for analysis compatible with the purpose of the study?" The answer to this query is Yes. It focuses on ensuring that little assumptions by the researchers find their way into the results.

Findings:

The first question in the findings section was, "are the findings presented within the context? (LoBiondo-Wood and Haber, 2014) The answer to this query is Yes. The findings focus on the painful experience the participants undergo after hip surgery. The second question was, "is the reader able to apprehend the essence of the experience from the report of the findings?" (LoBiondo-Wood and Haber, 2014) The answer to this query is again Yes, the reader is able to apprehend the essence of the experience from the report of the findings. The third question focused on whether the researcher's conceptualization was true to the data? (LoBiondo-Wood and Haber, 2014) The answer to this query is also Yes, since the concept illustrates the need for further attention toward the management of postoperative pain. The last question was whether the researcher placed the report in the context of what is already known about the phenomenon? (LoBiondo-Wood and Haber, 2014) Was the existing literature on the topic related to the findings? The answer to this query is Yes, the study is in the context of a quantitative research and the literature is relevant to the findings. Since quantitative studies support the findings in the study.

Conclusion, Implications, and Recommendations:

The first question in this section was, "do the conclusions, implications, & recommendations give the reader a context in which to use the findings?" (LoBiondo-Wood and Haber, 2014) The answer here is Yes, the conclusions, implications, & recommendations give the reader a context in which to use the findings. The second question was, "How do the conclusions reflect the study findings?" (LoBiondo-Wood and Haber, 2014) The conclusion acknowledges the significance of hip replacement surgery; however, it also establishes the need for improved postoperative pain management. The third question in this section focused on the researcher's recommendations: "What are the recommendations for future study? So they reflect the findings?" (LoBiondo-Wood and Haber, 2014) The study recommends further investigation into the way pain influences exercise in patients in order to propel enhanced care. The study also recommends tailored rehabilitation therapies that meet needs of every patient. The answer to this query is Yes, the recommendations reflect findings of the study. The last question was, "How has the researcher made explicit the significance of the study to nursing theory, research or practice?" The study shows clinical aspects that need to be addressed in improving postoperative pain management.

Lastly, this analysis also requires disclosure of my personal preferences: "Which type of study do you prefer to read? Why do you like it?" (LoBiondo-Wood and Haber, 2014) I prefer the cross-sectional survey study because it is structured and data analysis is easy to follow compared to the descriptive qualitative approach, which is semi-structured and difficult to follow.

References

Explorable.com (n.d). Quantitative and Qualitative Research. Retrieved 20 September 2014 from https://explorable.com/quantitative-and-qualitative-research

Jaye C (2002). Doing qualitative research in general practice: methodological utility and engagement. Retrieved 20 September 2014 from http://fampra.oxfordjournals.org/content/19/5/557.full

Lindberg, M., Grov, E., Gay, C., Rustoen, T., Granheim, T., Amlie, E., & Lerdal, A. (2013). Pain characteristics and self-rated health after elective orthopaedic surgery - a cross-sectional survey. Journal Of Clinical Nursing, 22(9/10), 1242-1253. doi:10.1111/jocn.12149Joelsson, M., Olsson, L., & Jakobsson, E. (2010). Patients' experience of pain and pain relief following hip replacement surgery. Journal Of Clinical Nursing, 19(19/20), 2832-2838. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2702.2010.03215.x

LoBiondo-Wood, G. And Haber, J. (2014). Nursing Research - Methods and Critical Appraisal for Evidence-Based Practice, 8th edition. Mosby.

Merriam, S.B., & Merriam, S.B. (2009). Qualitative research: A guide to design and implementation. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

Research Design Review, (2011). Four Components of the Quality Framework for Qualitative Research Design. Retrieved 20 September 2014 from http://researchdesignreview.com/2011/11/26/four-components-of-the-quality-framework/

Research-methodology.com, (n.d). Research Methods. Retrieved 20… [END OF PREVIEW]

Buy the Full, 6-Page Paper:  $22.68 Download Microsoft Word File

or

Access All 175,000 Papers:  $27.43 Download Microsoft Word File

or

Let Us Write a NEW Paper for You! Ask Us to Write a New Paper
?

Three Ordering Options

  1. 1.Buy this single paper for $22.68.  We will email to you the Microsoft Word file (.docx) within 12 hours.
  2. 2.Want to download this paper right now, immediately?  No problem.  After you subscribe for only $27.43, you'll be able to log-in and download any of our 175,000 private & exclusive papers.  You'll have unlimited access, 24/7!  You'll also receive a 10% discount on custom writing orders (see #3).
  3. 3.We saved the best option for last!  One of our highly experienced experts will write a brand new, 100% unique paper matching the exact topic and specifications that you provide!  You'll be the only person on the planet to receive the paper that we write!

Gance-Cleveland, B. (2004). "Qualitative Evaluation of aView Paper


Gance-Cleveland's Study, "Qualitative Evaluation of a School-BasedView Paper


Gance-Cleveland the Purpose of the Study WasView Paper


Ridge and Goodson (2000), Through the UseView Paper


Osteoarthritis Among Middle Age FemalesView Paper


View 9 other related papers  >>

Cite This Paper:

APA Format

Hip Replacement Surgery: Qualitative Analysis.  (2014, September 23).  Retrieved October 18, 2018, from https://www.essaytown.com/subjects/paper/hip-replacement-surgery-qualitative/4606598

MLA Format

"Hip Replacement Surgery: Qualitative Analysis."  23 September 2014.  Web.  18 October 2018. <https://www.essaytown.com/subjects/paper/hip-replacement-surgery-qualitative/4606598>.

Chicago Format

"Hip Replacement Surgery: Qualitative Analysis."  Essaytown.com.  September 23, 2014.  Accessed October 18, 2018.
https://www.essaytown.com/subjects/paper/hip-replacement-surgery-qualitative/4606598.