Housing Discrimination in 1968 Case Study

Pages: 2 (782 words)  ·  Bibliography Sources: 4  ·  File: .docx  ·  Level: Master's  ·  Topic: Urban Studies

MHDC, the Supreme Court found that even though the result of a particular decision may end in discrimination against certain races, those who claim racial discrimination must prove that racial bias was the deciding factor and not just an unfortunate the result of the decision. (Arlington Heights v MHDC, 1977) Without more evidence proving racial bias, a claim of racial discrimination may be difficult to prove.

Buy full Download Microsoft Word File paper
for $19.77
But, as stated before, Sally does have her own evidence. A secretary transferred her call to Mark Armstrong, proving that he did indeed speak to her, while a co-worker overheard her objecting to inappropriate questions. This is indeed powerful evidence, but records of Armstrong's renters, especially if they prove to be absent any minorities, could be the deciding factor in his guilt. With this in mind, Sally Gant could take her complaint to HUD, the Department of Housing and Urban Development, and her dispute could be handled by an administrative judge. If so, the judge, if he or she finds discrimination has taken place, could assess a damages to Sally. These damages would include out of pocket expenses or losses, things like moving and storage expenses as well as any direct losses that may have occurred as a result of the discrimination. She could also receive compensatory damages for "humiliation, embarrassment, or emotional distress." (Barkley) Finally, if found to be in violation of the Fair Housing Act of 1968, Mark Armstrong, in addition to any damages awarded to Sally, could be fined up to $10,000, if this was his first violation, $25,000 for the second, and up to $50,000 if Armstrong had committed two or more violation in the past seven years.


Arlington heights v MHDC., 429 U.S. 252 (1977). Retrieved from http://caselaw.lp.findlaw.com/scripts/getcase.pl?court=U.S.&vol=429&invol=252

Barkley, Daniel. "Affordable Housing and Community Development Law."

Case Study on Housing Discrimination in 1968 the Assignment

American Bar Association. Retrieved from http://www.americanbar.org/newsletter/publications/gp_solo_magazine


Jones v Mayer Co,. 392 U.S. 409 (1968). Retrieved from http://caselaw.lp.findlaw.com/scripts/getcase.pl?court=U.S.&vol=392&invol=409

"Laws Against Housing Discrimination." The People's Law Library of Maryland.

Retrieved from http://www.peoples-law.org/node/506

"The Fair Housing Act." United States Department of Justice. Retrieved from http://www.justice.gov/crt//about/hce/title8.php [END OF PREVIEW] . . . READ MORE

Two Ordering Options:

Which Option Should I Choose?
1.  Buy full paper (2 pages)Download Microsoft Word File

Download the perfectly formatted MS Word file!

- or -

2.  Write a NEW paper for me!✍🏻

We'll follow your exact instructions!
Chat with the writer 24/7.

Discrimination in Housing Research Paper

Discrimination Against Blacks Term Paper

Latino Immigration Research Paper

Race Discrimination in Residential Housing Term Paper

1968 Civil Rights Movement Thesis

View 200+ other related papers  >>

How to Cite "Housing Discrimination in 1968" Case Study in a Bibliography:

APA Style

Housing Discrimination in 1968.  (2013, June 12).  Retrieved June 3, 2020, from https://www.essaytown.com/subjects/paper/housing-discrimination-1968/7340479

MLA Format

"Housing Discrimination in 1968."  12 June 2013.  Web.  3 June 2020. <https://www.essaytown.com/subjects/paper/housing-discrimination-1968/7340479>.

Chicago Style

"Housing Discrimination in 1968."  Essaytown.com.  June 12, 2013.  Accessed June 3, 2020.