Hurricane Sandy: Issues and Arguments Seen Narrowly Research Paper

Pages: 4 (1321 words)  ·  Bibliography Sources: 5  ·  File: .docx  ·  Level: College Senior  ·  Topic: Weather

Hurricane Sandy: Issues and Arguments

Seen narrowly, Hurricane Sandy is a triumphant story. Let us begin with the forecast. Americans were specified a week's notice that Hurricane Sandy would move north, and then, as an alternative of veering safely out to the Atlantic, would come onto dry land anywhere near New Jersey and gradually work inland before restructuring and moving north through Canada. Social media experts took notice.

Then there is the emergency backup. Emergency managers enjoyed fullest advantage of their week to get ready We saw an extraordinary mobilization at federal, state, and neighborhood levels, together with private-sector collaboration with respect to significant infrastructure: the power grid, connections, gas and water utilities, sewerage, and a lot more. There was a little unevenness around the edges (Serna, 2012). The usual emergency actions were besieged by the severity of events at quite a few points (Hurricane Sandy: Covering the Storm). There was a number of political-level friction across state borders and sandwiched between state- and local levels. Nevertheless, the response kept extraordinary focus, combining with media exposure to keep the U.S. death toll as little as fifty (Kirkland, E&E reporter).

Sum it all up? America is emerging more skilled -- and becoming better fast -- at emergency response to disasters of increasing geographical accomplishment, cost, and complexity.Buy full Download Microsoft Word File paper
for $19.77

Research Paper on Hurricane Sandy: Issues and Arguments Seen Narrowly, Assignment

But we can and ought to do more. Fifty lives lost to Sandy, despite the fact that smaller than the seventy deaths accounted from the Caribbean, on the other hand represents too much anguish and suffering. That premature estimate of $10-$20B in losses has before now shot up to $5-12B insured losses and taken as whole costs of $32-60B (Hurricane Sandy: Covering the Storm). Any final accounting will in all probability show the price of this disaster to be more equivalent to Hurricane Katrina than Hurricane Irene. An immense hit even for the U.S. $12T-dollar economy just as it's lastly beginning to recover from the financial-sector reeducation of 2008. The scene of a long-lasting stream of such events in the upcoming of ever-greater magnitude? Intolerable. In short America requires a similar national effort and supplementary long-term investment in decreasing the want for emergency comeback on such an impressive scale (Strasser, 2012).

The want for emergency response will never diminish. But we should not disconnect ourselves from the idea that emergencies will essentially keep on to growing in range, magnitude and impact, just because our society is on the increase in numbers, in property experience, and in economic activity (Serna, 2012). We can raise our society's flexibility to these events. We can decrease the geographical degree and the populace adversely affected by potential events (Kirkland, E&E reporter).

We in fact have an unblemished example, one we can build on:

Profit-making aviation. Over the precedent fifty years, property damage to natural hazards has been growing exponentially. Experts have exposed this to be the consequence of growing population and assets exposure in dangerous areas. Although it is also the consequence of a malfunction to learn from experience; a persistence on "upgrading as before" (Serna, 2012). By disparity, commercial air travel as calculated by takeoffs and landings has quadrupled over the equivalent half-century, but the quantity of flight-related accidents has stayed the same over that period or even decreased. That is due to the fact that a remarkable public-private corporation on the part of the airlines and the FAA, and due to the catalytic position enjoyed by a small but very important independent federal agency, the National Transportation Safety Board (NTSB).

We require an analog to the NTSB for natural disasters. Every disaster ought to trigger a national conversation, not just at the federal but also state and local echelons along the lines of what can our group of people here learn from what occurred (over there)? And that discussion is supposed to lead to a position of mutually-beneficial, symbiotic private- and public-sector events to construct resilience at the community stage and decrease future risk (Hurricane Sandy: Covering… [END OF PREVIEW] . . . READ MORE

Two Ordering Options:

Which Option Should I Choose?
1.  Buy full paper (4 pages)Download Microsoft Word File

Download the perfectly formatted MS Word file!

- or -

2.  Write a NEW paper for me!✍🏻

We'll follow your exact instructions!
Chat with the writer 24/7.

View 200+ other related papers  >>

How to Cite "Hurricane Sandy: Issues and Arguments Seen Narrowly" Research Paper in a Bibliography:

APA Style

Hurricane Sandy: Issues and Arguments Seen Narrowly.  (2012, December 12).  Retrieved July 5, 2020, from

MLA Format

"Hurricane Sandy: Issues and Arguments Seen Narrowly."  12 December 2012.  Web.  5 July 2020. <>.

Chicago Style

"Hurricane Sandy: Issues and Arguments Seen Narrowly."  December 12, 2012.  Accessed July 5, 2020.