Innovative Practices in Public School Term Paper

Pages: 10 (3328 words)  ·  Bibliography Sources: ≈ 13  ·  File: .docx  ·  Level: College Senior  ·  Topic: Teaching

Participation on a daily basis both independently, in small groups and in whole class debates.

Effort both in and out of class should be emphasized. (homework should be assigned on a daily basis)

Attitude towards education: all students should be anticipated to come to class ready and eager to do their work on a daily basis.

Conclusion of performance tasks in the classroom and the attempt and skill revealed all through the tasks.

Observations ought to be made all through class work.

Teachers have got to review the development of all the students each and every day. They must assess how a student is doing in class together with what a student can and cannot do yet; and then modify their teaching in an effort to tolerate each student to nurture and gain knowledge. Assessment permits the teachers to collect information on each child so they can conclude their strengths and their requirements (Chris, 2000).


In the public school system power lies with the creators, not the customers. One might presume that "public" education was considered to provide the public interest and to report to the public for its performance. However, one would be incorrect. Most effectual power today resides inside the education establishment (Pommereau, 1996).

Buy full Download Microsoft Word File paper
for $19.77
We require key shifts of power and control over resources from creators to customers and from specialists to civilians. That involves cracking the establishment domination, and giving parents, electorate, taxpayers, elected officials, and society leaders far superior say over what schools have to achieve, how they will be held responsible for doing this, and how children and schools will be coordinated to one another (Pommereau, 1996).


The system has deficient in apparent standards and prospects, what businessmen describe as "product specifications." One-motive American students do not study what they ought to study is that the education system is so unformulated about what it demands of them.

Term Paper on Innovative Practices in Public School Assignment

Any well-functioning enterprise starts with simplicity about its prospects. Successful organization can portray with fair accuracy what they are trying to achieve, what their indicators of excellence are, and by what indicators they decide how they are charging. So, too, with education. The quality insurrection have to start by spelling out what young Americans will know and be capable to do if the schools execute their job correctly (Hirsch, 1996).


Furthermore, there is no universal accountability. As former Secretary of Education William J. Bennett has noted, there are "greater, more certain, and more immediate penalties in this country for serving up a single rotten hamburger in a restaurant than for repeatedly furnishing a thousand school-children with a rotten education (Lisa, 1995, Pg 12)." And as one more former Secretary of Education, Lamar Alexander, has observed, "Teaching is the only profession in which you are not paid one extra cent for being good at your job (Lisa, 1995, Pg 12)." Those running the education system marsh off all accountability. No rewards come to the successful, or spitefulness to those who do not succeed (Lisa, 1995).

A propose that a proper system of accountability has quite a few fundamentals: exams that mirror the preferred goals and values of the state or society; an intermingle of teacher-designed assessments (imperative for analysis and classroom improvement) and exterior tests, arranged and administered -- like a sovereign audit -- by people other than the school system's individual managers; rapidity and simplicity of test outcome, together with their comparability over time and across powers; and the service of other measurements of success, such as turnout, graduation rates, and the occurrences of discipline problems (Lisa, 1995).

Supply-side pluralism:

All schools ought to embrace a universal foundation of skills and knowledge, but they ought to also be optimistic to differ along other scopes. Children are different in learning styles, character, and individual fondness. Families are different in the educational experiences they desire for their children (chiefly in such areas as principles, ethics, and personality). Educators differ in viewpoint, enthusiasm, and knowledge. Societies, states, and regions have distinguishing customs, precedence, and anxieties. America is too big and different a country to expect a solitary educational model to fit everyone (Seymour, 1996).

Hence, rather than trying to regulate our schools, constraining them with set of laws, and punishing them for opposing, we should welcome educational pluralism and the liberty and rivalry that escort it. Let schools vie with one another on the foundation of their characteristic features; let them do all they can to draw students and families -- and to please those they magnetize (Seymour, 1996).


No school is eventually better than the people who effort in it. Great teachers, accordingly, are a valuable asset, worth positioning, appealing, satisfying, and preserving. They should be cared for as professionals, not as appointed helping hands. In return, they have to conduct themselves like a professional (Samuel, 1999).

Professionalism entails conceding to individual schools a wide collection of results historically made "downtown," together with matters of instruction, recruitment, resource allotment, timetable, school "climate," and regulation. So long as these decisions capitulate the preferred results -- and the clients are satisfied -- the school's staff ought to be free to systematize itself and its work as it thinks best (Samuel, 1999).

My Personal Recommendations:

do not seek a common position for public school education - a miscellaneous "all things of equal value" position - but as an alternative wish to move beyond that to a higher position that incorporates complication and competing formations. A higher position where conflicting facts should be an essential part of American democracy. We require an education system that chains multiple formations of an educated American, that subjects all such formations to the examination of research and public accountability, as well as that fixes all events of classrooms and schools within the margins of fairness. American students, as well as schools lose each time one "truth" acquires currency and holds back opposing ideas of public education.

So let me conclude by asserting that there are people with amazingly good will and adoring intent who effort in the light of disagreement on the subject of what our schools require or ought to have. They are blamed by their opponents of being self-pitying schemers with menacing motives, but the majority of them are not. On the other hand, a lot of those who are most powerful or influential are exceptionally persuaded that their way is the true way to develop education and that all other ways are fake, dreadful, and crooked.

We need to understand that, most often, life does not enclose single reality but instead is about dilemmas, challenging views, and evident conflicts. The public school system must rate and consent to multiple formations of education that students, parents, as well as faculty members can prefer from - some purebreds, some crossbreeds, and some yet to be recognized, but all dedicated to students and their chase of the American Dream.

We have got to fight against any single form, arrangement, technique, or system of education. We have got to enlarge the freedom of schools to test novel conceptions of standards, assessments, as well as accountability. In due course, we have got to hold every school and district accountable for whether it has supplied an education for all children that can be documented to augment options of life, freedom, and the quest of happiness.


proper revolution in education means more than fixing up the schools we have now; it also means making schools we have never before anticipated. Following are some of the new and innovative ideas presented in the paper.

The power needs to be transferred so that vast school systems can break into smaller and more manageable units -- and perhaps consolidating some tiny, dysfunctional units.

Standards must be set -- at a minimum -- this means determined high-school-graduation standards that consist not of courses taken or time spent but of demonstrable skills and knowledge.

For standards to have a genuine impact, we need high-quality tests and other assessments of student and school performance vis-a-vis those standards. We need dependable information about how we are doing. And we require accountability mechanisms that comprise real stakes and penalties for everyone involved.

Instead of donating geographic monopolies to particular schools or systems, let them contend on one another's territory.

Instead of assuming that all public schools have got to be the creatures of large, bureaucratic systems, we ought to support entrepreneurship by teachers and other educators, by a mixture of public and private institutions, even by the business sector.


Eventually, an American education system has got to stand on a foundation that is wider than the viewpoint of any one entity or any one group. It ought to support, admire, and sustain any formations - no matter how completely contrasting to one's personal formation- that are eager to be experienced openly and liberally. In addition, it… [END OF PREVIEW] . . . READ MORE

Two Ordering Options:

Which Option Should I Choose?
1.  Buy full paper (10 pages)Download Microsoft Word File

Download the perfectly formatted MS Word file!

- or -

2.  Write a NEW paper for me!✍🏻

We'll follow your exact instructions!
Chat with the writer 24/7.

Taxation and the Distribution of Money to Trenton Public School District in New Jersey Essay

Public Policy and Stem Public Policy Education Term Paper

Schools and At-Risk Students Continuation Classes Term Paper

Public Relations Term Paper

Change an Innovative Change: Helping Parents Better Term Paper

View 200+ other related papers  >>

How to Cite "Innovative Practices in Public School" Term Paper in a Bibliography:

APA Style

Innovative Practices in Public School.  (2003, August 2).  Retrieved September 22, 2020, from

MLA Format

"Innovative Practices in Public School."  2 August 2003.  Web.  22 September 2020. <>.

Chicago Style

"Innovative Practices in Public School."  August 2, 2003.  Accessed September 22, 2020.