Investment Patterns Among the Sexes Essay

Pages: 8 (2421 words)  ·  Bibliography Sources: 8  ·  File: .docx  ·  Level: College Senior  ·  Topic: Economics

Investment Patterns Among the Sexes

"There's been a lot of academic research suggesting that men think they know what they're doing, even when they really don't know what they're doing." -- John Ameriks

Studies have shown human beings to make non-rational financial decisions, and that these decisions are based on a combination of overconfidence and misguided faith in largely irrelevant pieces of information. In a New York Times article on the subject, reporter Jeff Sommer discusses recent data demonstrating that men were more likely to make poor investment decisions during the economic downturn of 2008-09, and investigates possible reasons behind this increased likelihood. He concludes that it is largely the result of an overconfidence that is seen less often in women, and may stem from a combination of evolutionary biology and psychology.

Get full Download Microsoft Word File access
for only $8.97.
In the New York Times article "How men's overconfidence hurts them as investors," reporter Jeff Sommer covers a variety of scientific research looking into how sex and gender affect financial decisions, focusing on research that shows men being more confident in their ability to "make sense" of small-scale market fluctuations than women, leading men to make trades which ultimately result in a loss. The article proposes a number of different possible reasons for the discrepancy, and although it does not claim to have a definitive explanation for men's overconfidence when it comes to investing, it does offer some insight into the differing investment patterns between sexes and the underlying biological and psychological reasons for them. Sommer finds that men's overconfidence can likely be seen as the result of evolutionary pressures coupled with historical gender bias constructions, and the increased frequency in trading exhibited by men is a result of differences in how certain portions of men and women's brain are activated in response to certain stimuli.

Essay on Investment Patterns Among the Sexes There's Been Assignment

The main focus of the article is data released by Vanguard, a mutual fund company. The data showed that "during the financial crisis of 2008 and 2009, men were much more likely than women to sell their shares at stock market lows. Those sales presumably meant big losses -- and missing the start of the market rally that began a year ago" (Sommer, 2010). This does not apply to every man or woman, but rather, as a group, men were more likely to trade their shares of stock, and the article notes that this "fits the patterns found in path-breaking research by Brad M. Barber of the University of California, Davis, and Terrance Odean, now at the University of California, Berkeley."

The Berkeley study, "Boys Will Be Boys: Gender, Overconfidence and Common Stock Investment," looked at "the investing behavior of more than 35,000 households from a large discount brokerage firm." The analysis found that "all else being equal, men traded stocks nearly 50% more often than women" (Sommer 2010). This tendency to trade more frequently automatically increases the risk of a loss, because "staying the course and minimizing costs -- selling high and buying low, if you trade at all -- are the classic characteristics of good long-term, buy-and-hold investors." Coupled with the severe downturn of 2008 and 2009, men's tendency to trade more frequently found them selling shares at the wrong times, thus increasing their losses beyond those caused by the overall declines in the stock market. While the tendency to trade more frequently is the cause of men's overall investment losses, the reasons for that desire to trade frequently are more obscure.

As the title of the article suggests, Sommer argues that men's overconfidence is the reason for their more-frequent trading, and thus their greater losses during the most recent economic downturn. Sommer provides quotes from both an executive at Vanguard and Brad Barber, one of the authors of the "Boys Will Be Boys Study." According to John Ameriks, head of Vanguard Investment Counseling and Research, "there's been a lot of academic research suggesting that men think they know what they're doing, even when they really don't know what they're doing." Professor Barber supports this view, proposing that "in general, overconfident investors are going to be interpreting what's going on around them and feeling they are able make decisions that they're really not equipped to make." Sommer then proposes three possible reasons why this overconfidence might present itself in men, or at least why men might be more susceptible to it.

Firstly, Sommer notes that "researchers have found that activating the nucleus accumbens -- a brain region that is stimulated when you eat delicious food or look at an attractive person -- can affect financial risk-taking." However, the results of this research bear some examination, because they do not necessarily show a conclusive difference in brain functioning between men and women. "When young Stanford men were shown pictures of partially clothed men and women kissing, he said, that region of their brains was activated. And when they were then given financial tests, the men became more likely to "make high-risk gambles" (Sommer, 2010). Women did not respond similarly to the images, and their performance in subsequent financial tests was not affected the same as the men. The researchers proposed that "it's possible [they] didn't test enough women or that they haven't found the right stimuli," suggesting that if women's nucleus accumbens could be activated by alternate means, then they might exhibit the same increase in "high-risk gambles" seen in the men's results. Thus, while this portion of the brain seems to influence financial decisions, one cannot say with certainty that it only affects men; rather, it seems more likely that men and women differ in how this portion of the brain is activated, but once activated, it affects the financial decisions of both sexes equally. However, it may be true that men's nucleus accumbens are activated more easily than women, thus creating an asymmetry in practice.

Secondly, research has shown a correlation between testosterone and risk-taking, which suggests that perhaps men's overconfidence is a result of an evolutionary holdover; increased testosterone may have given men a proper amount of confidence when the majority of risks were related to physical activity, but when the risks are largely abstract, mental calculations, that extra confidence does not bring an accompanying increase in predictive ability. In fact, that overconfidence likely causes men to ignore or otherwise intentionally refute certain information that may disagree with their desired conception of the market, further exacerbating a decision-making process already based on spurious information.

The last possible reason Sommer suggests for men's overconfidence in investing is also a result of human evolution, albeit related to psychology, rather than biology. According to an economics professor at Colorado State University, "before the dawn of history, aggressive risk-taking might have given men an advantage in finding mates […] while women might have become more risk-averse to protect their offspring" (Sommer, 2010). The professor, Alexandra Bernasek, also suggests that this behavioral difference was likely affected by gender relations throughout history, so that "enormous gender disparities in earnings, wealth, power and social status" may have encouraged contemporary men to assume themselves automatically correct simply by the position they find themselves in as a result of historical gender bias.

In addition, although neither the article nor Bernasek propose the idea, it is reasonable to presume that centuries of repression has encouraged women to avoid risky behavior, as they would more likely receive disproportionate punishment or admonishment compared to men should that risk turn into calamity. In effect, men may be more inclined towards risk-taking because they have stacked the deck in their favor, so they are least likely to feel the negative effects of that risk. (This is essentially the mentality which brought about the most recent economic disaster, and in fact, a majority of the banks and financial institutions directly responsible for taking the risks which caused the economic collapse have not had to face many of the negative effects of their risk-taking.)

Although the claims about men in the article alone are not completely convincing, if only because of Sommer's somewhat milquetoast conclusion that "science may eventually provide some answers," additional research regarding investment habits and motivations has shown that a number of non-rational factors affect investment choice, and by examining these factors, one is able to see that in general, his presumptions regarding men and women's trading habits are supported by larger trends.

Only relatively recently have individual characteristics and traits of investors been studied in any detail. In the 1974 essay "The Individual Investor: Attributes and Attitudes," the authors note "we should expect to be confronted with a rich body of evidence about the characteristics, attitudes, portfolio selection rules, and realized investment returns of the small investor. As it happens, however, we appear to know surprisingly little about him" (Lease, Lewellen, & Schlarbaum, 1974, p.414). (the authors' use of the male pronoun here even implicitly demonstrates how little consideration has been paid to investment differences based on sex.) Even as recently as 1990, the essay "Using Demographic and Lifestyle Analysis to Segment Individual Investors" notes that "while a great deal… [END OF PREVIEW] . . . READ MORE

Two Ordering Options:

Which Option Should I Choose?
1.  Buy full paper (8 pages)Download Microsoft Word File

Download the perfectly formatted MS Word file!

- or -

2.  Write a NEW paper for me!✍🏻

We'll follow your exact instructions!
Chat with the writer 24/7.

U.S. Policy Towards Thai Women Sex Trafficking Term Paper

Ethical Issues of South Africa's Black Economic Empowerment Program Term Paper

Latin American Women's Cultural Decision in Labor Force vs. Procreation in Past vs. Present Research Paper

Promoting Performance Culture in Organizations Enhancing Sustainable Organizational Productivity of SME's in Gambia Dissertation

Eric Hobsbawm's Age of Extremes Term Paper

View 200+ other related papers  >>

How to Cite "Investment Patterns Among the Sexes" Essay in a Bibliography:

APA Style

Investment Patterns Among the Sexes.  (2011, April 7).  Retrieved November 25, 2020, from

MLA Format

"Investment Patterns Among the Sexes."  7 April 2011.  Web.  25 November 2020. <>.

Chicago Style

"Investment Patterns Among the Sexes."  April 7, 2011.  Accessed November 25, 2020.