Israel and Iran Thesis

Pages: 10 (2736 words)  ·  Bibliography Sources: 8  ·  File: .docx  ·  Level: College Senior  ·  Topic: History - Israel

Israeli citizens support the striking of Iran especially if the war is carried out with the help of the United States (Clifton). Though the majority supports the attack, a small percentage of the public are wary of the war. A modest forty percent of the total Israeli population support a military strike when Israel has American support and twenty percent advocate for attacking Iran's nuclear facilities without any support from the United States. The Israeli poll was carried out to gauge the level of support for the military action against the nuclear facilities in Iran. Recently the Israeli parliament told Reuters that the Israeli public was well behind the proposal to attack Iran. Though the lack of preparation was blamed on the side of the Israeli military, the parliament was convinced the public was rallying behind the striking of Iran to avert the country's nuclear threats.

Download full Download Microsoft Word File
paper NOW!
Additionally, a poll carried out by Shibley Telhami, a professor at Maryland University showed Israelis believed the military strike if carried out on Iran would ultimately slow down the nuclear progress by more than three years (Gharib). The pollster reveals that the Israelites believe that the attack would not prevent Iran from acquiring more nuclear power. Another survey by Guttmann's center shows the same result as the others. The survey found that 60% of Israelis called for the Iranian attack with the backing of American forces (Clifton, Polling: Israelis Wary of a Unilateral Attack on Iran). The poll found that a good 20% of the Israeli public was convinced Israel was capable of launching a successful attack on Iran without any support from the United States. The remaining part of the surveyed group was against the strike on Iran in any circumstances.

Repercussions of Attack on Iran

Thesis on Israel and Iran to the Assignment

The Israeli citizenry has always shown adaptability in the face of daily missile and terrorist attacks. Even though Israelis are aware of the possibility of missile attack from both Lebanon and Gaza, they are well prepared for the repercussions. On the other hand, Hezbollah and Hamas fear the political price they may pay for attacks. All terror organizations have gone under because of loss of power and influence after the last encounter with Israel. They are afraid another attack on Israel might further destroy their power. This makes them vulnerable and less likely to attack or retaliate in case of an Israeli attack. Whatever the case may be, Israeli leaders are not concerned about Hezbollah and Hamas vengeance affect their decision because they are aware the Israeli public will bear the risk of a strike on Iran (Harmon, 2012). Ehud Barak, Israeli's defense minister insisted that any retaliation brought by Iranian for an Israeli attack would be survivable and his government predict that Iran's involvement in a bluff has been a key element in the exaggerated expectation that Israel is considering a strike. However, Iran's highly advanced security services like analysts' caution may maneuver in semi-rogue way, relying on goals that may seem to be illogical to American planners.

Israel's Elections

The Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu call for early elections and agitating victory to his party could make the possibility of launching a strike on Iran's nuclear facilities possible. The premier called for elections before the American to reposition himself in the Iranian conflict. This step was to enable Netanyahu to stay steadfast such that he could be able to withstand American pressure on handling of the Iranian warfare.

The premier is looking for early elections and a win for the incumbent American president Obama would see the end of the planned Israeli strike on Iran's nuclear facilities. Netanyahu looks for a way of winning the election and a victory in the September elections would see the premier attack Iran before the November American elections. This has cast a dark cloud over the strike on Iran with America propagating for an attack on Iran after elections.

The Israeli elections could help achieve more support for a strike on Iran. The victory in the elections would give Benjamin Netanyahu the confidence to carry out an attack on the nuclear-armed Iran. The interpretation of the victory to Netanyahu would mean the public has given him the go ahead to strike Iran. The early election and a win could prove to be more easing and a sign of an attack on the Iranian nuclear plants.

Finally, the coming Israel's elections could push the attack further until November. This wish for election earlier than recommended is Netanyahu's wish to have restructured his rule before Obama's and thereby having a newer administration carrying out the necessary attacks when he gets power. The premier lone fear is that working with Obama for more years would make the imminent attack on Iran suspended to some other times.

Arab Spring

The increasing tension in the Arab continent has led to powerful forces across the region ignited by youths looking to get the countries from dictators. The aftermath of these revolutions has made the generation war and terror oriented. The post Arab revolutionary youths have led to the spread of terror activities in other non-Arab countries such as Israel. These Arab youths have been made to view Israel as their enemy as with the case of Iran. These youths terrorize Israelites; a reason which has made the attack on Iran imminent.

The falling of several Middle East dictators who were sympathetic to Israel has resulted into a crop of leaders like Mahmoud Ahmadinejad who are derogative to Israel and other non-Arab countries. This Arab Spring has produced government leaders who are more concerned with their countries and regional governments. These leaders have been hostile to Israel than their predecessors making Israel vulnerable in the Arab region. This has placed Israel in a trickier position and the main way they can deal with this problem is via militarily attacking Iran's nuclear program.

In his speech at a conference in Tehran, Iran's Mahmoud Ahmadinejad called for the wiping out of Israel from the Arabian region. Ahmadinejad further denounced any attempts by Arabian nations to have good relations with Israel. He criticized the Muslim and Arab presidents who acknowledged the existence of Israel among them as weak and untrue to Islam. Ahmadinejad emphasized his speech was to reflect Iranians views and the country would see that Israel was completely obliterated. This was a derogatory and Israeli leader; Shimon Peres and Ariel Sharon also declared that Iran too could be wiped off. This made Israel prepare for any direct confrontation with Iran and an attack on Iran by Israeli forces in the near future is possible

Works Cited

Benn, Aluf. "Netanyahu is preparing Israeli public opinion for a war on Iran." Haaretz 15 March 2012.

Clifton, Eli. "Polling: Israelis Wary of A Unilateral Attack on Iran." 9 March 2012. 8 May 2012.

-- . "Polling: Israelis Wary Of A Unilateral Attack On Iran." 9 March 2012. 8 May 2012.

Gharib, Ali. "Poll: Israelis Don't Want Iran Attack Without U.S. Support." 29 February 2012 . 8 May 2012.

Harmon, Adam. 2012.

-- . "Why Israel Will Attack Iran." Small Wars Journal is published (2012).

Jerusalem Post. Jerusalem Post 8 December 2009.

Myre, Greg. 2012.

-- . "Reasons Why Israel Might Bomb Iran, Or Not." NPR 8 February 2012.


Two Ordering Options:

Which Option Should I Choose?
1.  Download full paper (10 pages)Download Microsoft Word File

Download the perfectly formatted MS Word file!

- or -

2.  Write a NEW paper for me!✍🏻

We'll follow your exact instructions!
Chat with the writer 24/7.

Israel Defense Tech Israeli Defense Technology: Success Thesis

Iran Hostage Discussion Questions: Middle East History Research Paper

Iran Problem Diplomatic and Economic Response to a Potential Nuclear Threat Essay

Iran Revolution Term Paper

Iran the Current President Term Paper

View 200+ other related papers  >>

How to Cite "Israel and Iran" Thesis in a Bibliography:

APA Style

Israel and Iran.  (2012, May 8).  Retrieved April 14, 2021, from

MLA Format

"Israel and Iran."  8 May 2012.  Web.  14 April 2021. <>.

Chicago Style

"Israel and Iran."  May 8, 2012.  Accessed April 14, 2021.